Afriliani Afriliani(1*),

(1) Universitas Terbuka
(*) Corresponding Author


Twitter, an online platform that is said to have a more constructive and meaningful response to the issues, is also where people are creative writers of cyber literature. Lately, there has been a trend of Twitter users to write fiction lines that have a premise of “what is your last line if you in the ending of a relationship.” This research intended to seek the attitude of Indonesian writing fiction in English. This paper analyses a short written online discourse called ‘tweet’ using Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). This analysis focuses on appraising attitudes that are feeling on reacting to emotion, putting the judgment, and evaluating things. The data is taken from a Twitter account, namely @literarybase, by shorting 100 popular tweets taken to seek the trend and 20 tweets among them to be classified on its appraisal criterion. The results show that a relationship's trend ends with a sad ending rather than a happy ending. However, positive affection holds the most significant shares of lexical choice, followed by judgment and appreciation the least. That means the users mostly used ironic writing that contrasts expectation with reality. Linguistic research also implied that tragedy plot is favorable in online discourse. The study has identified the practical way of assessing attitudes in short-writing fiction on online platforms and the tendency of a community to see value in a relationship and how they express themselves in a foreign language. 


Cyber Literature, Appraisal, SFL, Twitter.

Full Text:



Afriliani, Yuwono, U., & Kushartanti, B. (2018). the Power of Online Media: Critical Discourse Analysis of Security Critics. 4(2008), 9–20.

Argamon, S., Bloom, K., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2009). Automatically determining attitude type and force for sentiment analysis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5603 LNAI(October), 218–231.

Bagley, C. A. (2012). Chapter 6 Embracing Twitter as a Research Tool. In G. Widén & K. Holmberg (Eds.), Social Information Research (Vol. 5, pp. 131–147). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Cortis, K., & Davis, B. (2021). Over a decade of social opinion mining: a systematic review. In Artificial Intelligence Review (Vol. 54, Issue 7). Springer Netherlands.

Crow, G., & Wiles, R. (2008). Managing anonymity and confidentiality in social research: the case of visual data in Community research. Economic & Social Research Council, 8(8), 1–14.

Falk. (2017). Journal of Communication Management. Journal of Communication Management Journal of Communication Management Iss Journal of Communication Management, 21(4), 342–354.

Fontaine, L. (2017). Lexis as most local context: towards an SFL approach to lexicology. Functional Linguistics, 4(1).

Garrod, S., & Terras, M. (2000). The Contribution of Lexical and Situational Knowledge to Resolving Discourse Roles: Bonding and Resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(4), 526–544.

Glanzberg, M. (2002). Context and discourse. Mind and Language, 17(4), 333–375.

Goudsblom, J. (2000). N o n - F i c t i o n as a Literary G e n r e.

Gunitsky, S. (2015). Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability. Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), 42–54.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). On Language and Linguistics (Vol. 3, Issue 0). Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar: Fourth edition. In Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar: Fourth Edition (4th ed.). Routledge.

Hood, S. (2012). Voice and stance as appraisal: Persuading and positioning in research writing across intellectual fields. In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres (pp. 51–68).

J.R. Martin and P.R.R. White. (2005). The Language of Evaluation. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.

Khoo, C. S. G., Nourbakhsh, A., & Na, J. C. (2012). Sentiment analysis of online news text: A case study of appraisal theory. Online Information Review, 36(6), 858–878.

Literary Base. (2022). Literary Base di Twitter: “/lt calling all writers and poets! drop your last line!” / Twitter.

Liu, H., Lieberman, H., & Selker, T. (2003). A model of textual affect sensing using real-world knowledge. 125.

Lukin, A. (2017). Ideology and the text-in-context relation. Functional Linguistics, 4(1).

McEvoy, Sean., Coult, Tony., & Sandford, Chris. (2009). Tragedy : a student handbook. English and Media Centre.

Neviarouskaya, A., Prendinger, H., & Ishizuka, M. (2010). Recognition of affect, judgment, and appreciation in text. Coling 2010 - 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference, 2(August), 806–814.

Neviarouskaya, A., Prendinger, H., & Ishizuka, M. (2011). Affect Analysis Model: Novel rule-based approach to affect sensing from text. Natural Language Engineering, 17(1), 95–135.

Simmons, A. M. (2018). Student Use of SFL Resources on Fantasy, Canonical, and Non-fiction Texts: Critical Literacy in the High School ELA Classroom. Educational Linguistics, 33, 71–90.

Smith, B. G. (2012). Organic integration: The natural process underlying communication integration. Journal of Communication Management, 16(1), 4–19.

Song, L. (2010). The Role of Context in Discourse Analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6).

Tavadze, L. (2019). The role of irony in text interpretation. In International Journal of Management and Applied Science (Issue 5).

To, V., Lê, Q., & Lê, T. (2015). Applying Halliday’s linguistic theory in qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 15(2), 135–146.

Turmudi, D. (2020). English scholarly publishing activities in the industrial revolution 4 . 0 : What , Why , and How ? ELTEJ, 3(1), 52–63.

Winda, R., & Dewi, H. (2016). A systemic functional linguistics (SFL) analysis of exposition texts as teaching materials written by pre-service teachers. Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 73–91.

Yap, & Ng, X. H. (2018). (2018). Social media opinion sharing: beyond volume. The Eletronic Library, 34(1), 1–5.

Yoo, J., Choi, S., Choi, M., & Rho, J. (2014). Why people use Twitter: social conformity and social value perspectives. Online Information Review, 38(2), 265–283.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Authors

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Unit Publikasi Ilmiah ( Scientific Publication Unit)


Gedung HI Lt 1, Ruang UPT Publikasi Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara No.116, Iringmulyo, Metro Timur, Kota Metro, Lampung 34111
Phone/WA: +6285709141060 


e-ISSN-2442-482x  p-ISSN-2089-3355

Download Premise Official Template  June -October 2022