STANCE COMPLEMENT CLAUSES CONTROLLED BY ADJECTIVES IN ESL AND EFL STUDENTS' ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS
(1) Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Stance becomes an important evaluative discourse feature that aids writers in conveying their arguments effectively. Studies have focused on comparing the stance of non-native speakers of English to that of native speakers and have not yet addressed the issue between English learners from different contexts. This study analyzes stance complement clauses controlled by adjectives by Singaporean ESL and Indonesian EFL students. It aims to uncover the frequency and distribution of stances and to explain why Singaporean students' stances differ from those of their Indonesian EFL counterparts. This study used quantitative and qualitative methods. The chi-squared test was carried out to determine whether there was a significant difference. The data were extracted from a sub-written ICNALE corpus, the essays by Singaporean and Indonesian students at the B1_2 level. The chi-squared test indicates there is a significant difference. The results reveal a higher use of stance adjectives among Singaporean ESL students compared to Indonesian EFL students. This study has important implications. Explicit teaching and learning of stance features used adequately in the argument's structure are needed, especially highlighting adjectival repertoire for variety and nuance to the EFL students' stance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., & Farukh, A. (2020). Use of Modals as Stance Markers: A Corpus-Based Study on Pakistani English Newspaper Editorials. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 30(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X20945424
Akoto, O. Y., & Afful, J. B. A. (2020). Variations in Metadiscourse Use in English Language Introduction and Literature Review Thesis Chapters. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 4(2), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v4i2.2601
Al Zumor, A. Q. (2021). Stance in Advanced Academic Writing by Saudi EFL Postgraduates: A Corpus-based Study of Critique Writing. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i4.4288
Amaliah, A., Sari, F., & Wahyudi, A. (2024). A Case Study of Argument Patterns in Japan and Korean EFL Learners' Argumentative Essays. Premise: Journal of English Education, 13(1), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i1.8792
Anthony, L. (2005). AntConc: Design and Development of a Freeware Corpus Analysis Toolkit for the Technical Writing Classroom. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference Proceedings, 729–737. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/research/ipcc_2005_anthony_antconc.pdf
Aull, L. L., & Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing. Written Communication, 31(2), 151–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055
Barbara, S. W. Y., Afzaal, M., & Aldayel, H. S. (2024). A corpus-based comparison of linguistic markers of stance and genre in the academic writing of novice and advanced engineering learners. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 284. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02757-4
Barrot, J., & Gabinete, M. K. (2021). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in the argumentative writing of ESL and EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 59(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0012
Bautista, M. L. S., & Gonzalez, A. B. (2006). Southeast Asian Englishes. In B. Kachru, Y. Kachru, & C. L. Nelson (Eds.), The Handbook of World Englishes. Blackwell Publishing.
Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544689
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education Limited.
Bolton, K., Botha, W., & Bacon-Shone, J. (2017). English-medium instruction in Singapore higher education: policy, realities and challenges. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(10), 913–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1304396
Council of Europe. (2025). The CEFR Levels. In Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) Website. Council of Europe 2025. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/level-descriptions
Crosthwaite, P., Cheung, L., & Jiang, F. (Kevin). (2017). Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.02.001
Dixon, R. M. W., & Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Adjective Classes: A Cross-linguistic Typology (R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald, Eds.). Oxford University Press.
Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2015). Stance Markers. In K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Ho, V., & Li, C. (2018). The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students' timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001
Hyland, K. (1990). A Genre Description of the Argumentative Essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829002100105
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language Writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ishikawa, S. (2013). The ICNALE and Sophisticated Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis of Asian Learners of English. Learner Corpus Studies in Asia and the World, 1, 91–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24546/81006678
Ishikawa, S. (2023). The ICNALE Guide: An Introduction to a Learner Corpus Study on Asian Learners' L2 English (1st ed.). Routledge.
Jalali, H. (2017). Reflection of stance through it bundles in applied linguistics. Ampersand, 4, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001
Jiang, F. (Kevin). (2015). Nominal stance construction in L1 and L2 students' writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.07.002
Kachru, B. (1990). World Englishes and applied linguistics. World Englishes, 9(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1990.tb00683.x
Kirmizi, O., & Kirmizi, G. D. (2022). Nominal Stance in Cross-disciplinary Academic Writing of L1 and L2 Speakers in Noun + that Constructions. Journal of Language and Education, 8(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12252
Kitjaroonchai, N., & Duan, J. (2019). Stance and Engagement Use in a Timed Argumentative Essay by Asian First-Year University Students Studying English as a Foreign Language. Human Behavior, Development and Society, 20(3), 105–115. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hbds/article/view/216760
Kozáčiková, Z. (2021). Stance complement clauses controlled by verbs in academic research papers. Topics in Linguistics, 22(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2021-0002
Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004
Loi, C.-K., Lim, J. M.-H., & Wharton, S. (2016). Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions: International publications versus local publications. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.004
Man, D., & Chau, M. H. (2019). Learning to evaluate through that-clauses: Evidence from a longitudinal learner corpus. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.007
Mei, W. S. (2006). Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical Stance. RELC Journal, 37(3), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206071316
Meyer, H. (2005). Analysing argumentative writing. English in Education, 39(3), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2005.tb00626.x
Min, S., Paek, J. K., & Kang, Y. (2019). Exploring the Use of Hedges and Stance Devices in Relation to Korean EFL Learners' Argumentative Writing Qualities. English Teaching, 74(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.74.1.201903.3
Moafian, F., Talati-Baghsiahi, A., & Yarahmadzehi, N. (2018). Modal Auxiliaries as Stance-Taking Devices in Linguistics Research Articles: A Functional Contrastive Analysis. Linguistik Online, 91(4). https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.91.4396
Nirwanto, R. (2021). The Adoption of Cohesive Devices (CDs) in Indonesian Students of EFL's Opinion Essays. Premise: Journal of English Education, 10(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v10i1.3239
Papangkorn, P., & Phoocharoensil, S. (2021). A Comparative Study of Stance and Engagement Used by English and Thai Speakers in English Argumentative Essays. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 867–888. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14152a
Peacock, M. (2015). Stance adverbials in research writing. Ibérica, 29, 35–62. https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/248
Pemberton, C. (2020). In My Opinion: Modality in Japanese EFL Learners' Argumentative Essays. Asia Pacific Journal of Corpus Research, 1(2), 57–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22925/apjcr.2020.1.2.57
Pérez-Paredes, P., & Díez-Bedmar, M. B. (2019). Certainty adverbs in spoken learner language. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 5(2), 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.17019.per
Pyykönen, M. (2023). Epistemic stance in written L2 English: The role of task type, L2 proficiency, and authorial style. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 3(1), 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2022.100040
Sabzevar, A., Haghverdi, H., & Biriya, R. (2020). A Corpus-based Analysis of Epistemic Stance Adverbs in Essays Written by Native English Speakers and Iranian EFL Learners. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 12(25), 32–52. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jal/Article/961390
Soler, V. (2002). Analysing adjectives in scientific discourse: an exploratory study with educational applications for Spanish speakers at advanced university level. English for Specific Purposes, 21(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00034-X
Turmudi, D. (2020). Investigating the Indonesian EFL Students' Argument in Argumentative Essay. Premise: Journal of English Education, 9(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v9i2.3079
Uccelli, P., Dobbs, C. L., & Scott, J. (2013). Mastering Academic Language. Written Communication, 30(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312469013
Wang, L., & Liu, S. (2022). A Corpus-Based Study: A Comparison between Native Speakers and Chinese EFL Learners in Using Adjectives in Argumentative Writings. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 12(02), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2022.122013
Yoo, H., & Kim, H. (2023). A cross-modal analysis of lexical sophistication: EFL and ESL learners in written and spoken production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0204
Zareva, A. (2018). Evaluation in moderation: Evaluative adjectives in student academic presentations. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 12(2), A149–A162. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/574
Zhang, C., & Kang, S. (2022). A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners' writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002090
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v14i2.11647
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
Scientific Publication Unit (UPI)
Gd. HI, Lt1 Kampus 1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 116 A
Kota Metro Lampung 34145 Indonesia
Email : help.upi@ummetro.ac.id
Phone : +62-725-42445
Fax : +62-725-42454
Mobile : +62-8570914-1060
Certificate of Accreditation (Volume 11 No 1, 2022-Volume 15 No 2, 2026
