UNLEASHING HIDDEN POTENTIALS: THE EFFECT OF SELF-RECORDING IN LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i1.9020Keywords:
self-recording, self-assessment, peer assessment, speakingAbstract
The purpose of this study was to know the effects of using self-recording in peer and self-assessment in language learning. This mixed-method research design with post-test control groups utilized speaking tests, rubrics, self-assessment checklists, interview guides, and teaching scenarios to collect data. Instrument preparation, validation, and reliability tests were all part of rigorous data-gathering procedures. Using stratified random sampling, participants were divided into control and experimental groups. Each group received different treatment, using self-recording for peer and self-assessment in the experimental group and traditional oral presentations in the control group. Speaking performances by students were recorded for self-and peer assessment, whereas the control group was assessed using a teacher's criteria. The results of the posttest showed that the experimental group fared much better than the control group, demonstrating the superior effectiveness of self-recording in enhancing speaking skill. In addition, the results of the interview confirmed that self-recording is meaningful for self-control, feedback, time-shifted assessment, equity, and fairness. More importantly, the transformative power of self-recording in assessments highlights the critical function of self-recording in strengthening self-regulation abilities. Thus, in educational and assessment contexts, this technique has the potential to unleash hidden self-regulation capacities, resulting in deep personal development and positive transformations.
References
Adachi, C., Tai, J. H., & Dawson, P. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775
Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). The Power of Assessment Feedback in Teaching and Learning: A Narrative Review and Synthesis of the Literature. SN Social Sciences, 1(3), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00086-w
Alkhannani, B. M. (2021). The Effectiveness of Collaborative Teaching and Learning and Engaging Students as Partners on English Language Teaching in Saudi Arabia. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(10), 1288–1294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1110.17 The
Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2020). Problem-based learning, self- and peer assessment in higher education: towards advancing lifelong learning skills. Research Papers in Education, 37(2), 370–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1849371
Asuncion, M., & Encalada, R. (2019). Perceptions about Self-recording Videos to Develop EFL Speaking Skills in Two Ecuadorian Universities. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1001.07
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom Assessment and Pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Darong, H. C., & Niman, E. M. (2021). Do Teacher Questions Function as Assessment for Learning? Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science (RIELS) Journal, 2(3), 437–454.
Gitsaki, C., & Robby, M. A. (2018). Benefits of Language Assessment. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0805
Hager, K. D., Fiechtl, B. J., & Gunn, S. (2020). Assessing Student Performance Using Video Recordings in Field-Based Experiences. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 4(2), 7–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26077/60ee-875f
Hervas, G., Medina, J. L., & SandÃn, M. P. (2020). Participants ’ views of the use of video in lesson study in higher education in Spain: An exploratory multiple case study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1734509
Hoo, H., Deneen, C., & Boud, D. (2021). Developing student feedback literacy through self and peer assessment interventions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1925871
Ketabi, S. (2014). Classroom and Formative Assessment in Second/Foreign Language Teaching and Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(2), 435–440. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.2.435-440
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2017). Collaborative Learning Practices: Teacher and Student Perceived Obstacles to Effective Student Collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
Matthews, L. (2019). Should We Use Video Technology for Giving Feedback? Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1669480
Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J.A. (2012). Rubrics and Self-assessment Scripts Effects on Self-regulation, Learning and Self-efficacy in Secondary Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), https://doi.org/806–813. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007.
Panadero, E., & Jonsson. A, (2013). The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment
Purposes Revisited: A Review. Educational Research Review, 9(June), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.
Panadero, E., Brown, C., & Courtney, M. (2014). Teachers’ Reasons for Using Self-assessment: A Survey Self-report of Spanish Teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(4), 365–383. https://doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.919247.
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, W. (2016). Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning through Self-assessment and Peer Assessment: Guidelines for Classroom Implementation.†In Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation, edited by D. Laveault and L. Allal, 311–326. Boston, MA: Springer.
Panadero, E., & Brown. G.T.L., (2017). Teachers’ Reasons for Using Peer Assessment: Positive Experience Predicts Use. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(1). https://doi.org/133–156. doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Alqassab, M. (2018). Providing Formative Peer Feedback: What Do We Know? In The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback, edited by A. A. Lipnevich and J. K. Smith, 409–431. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Panadero, E., ipnevich, A., & J. Broadbent, J. (2019). Turning Self-assessment into Self-feedback. In The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education: Improving Assessment Outcomes for Learners, edited by D. Boud, M. D. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, and E. Molloy, 147–163. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Panadero, E., Fernández-ruiz, J., & Sánchez-iglesias, I. (2020). Secondary Education Students’ Self-Assessment: The Effects of Feedback, Subject Matter, Year Level, and Gender. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(6), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1835823
Prior, M. T. (2011). Self-presentation in L2 Interview Talk : Narrative Versions , Accountability , and Emotionality. Applied Linguistics 2011:, 32(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq033
Ramos, J. L., Cattaneo, A. A. P., Jong, F. P. C. M. De, & Gonçalo, R. (2022). Pedagogical models for the facilitation of teacher professional development via video-supported collaborative learning . A review of the state of the art. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(5), 695–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1911720
Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Self-assessment of video-recorded presentations : Does it improve skills? Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654807
Ryan, T., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2020). Digitally recorded assessment feedback in a secondary school context: student engagement , perception and impact. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1744479
Seifert, T., & Feliks, O. (2018). Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1487023
Shadiev, R., Yang, L., & Huang, Y. M. (2021). A review of research on 360-degree video and its applications to education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(5), 784–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1928572
Stark, K. S., Wekerle, C., Bischoff, A., Schweiger, M., Peuschel, K., Proske, K., … Sophie, K. (2023). A heuristic framework for video-based teaching and learning scenarios in higher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2242980
Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the Heart of Authentic Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & PracticeAqua, 18(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838
Tailab, M. M. K., & Marsh, N. Y. (2020). Use of Self- Assessment of Video Recording to Raise Students‘ Awareness of Development of Their Oral Presentation Skills. Higher Education Studies, 10(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n1p16
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 032-1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698
Widiastuti, I. A. S., & Saukah, A. (2017). Formative Assessment in EFL Classroom Practices. Bahasa Dan Seni, 45(1), 50–63.
Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2020). The Need to Disentangle Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687
Wylie, E. C. (2020). Observing Formative Assessment Practice: Learning Lessons Through Validation. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766955
Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2020). Developing a Formative Assessment Protocol to Support Professional Growth. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956
Yan, Z., Chiu, M. M., & Ko, P. Y. (2020). Effects of Self-Assessment Diaries on Academic Achievement, Self-Regulation, and Motivation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1827221
Yeh, H., Heng, L., & Tseng, S. (2020). Exploring the impact of video making on students ’ writing skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1795955
Zheng, L., Cui, P., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2017). Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta- cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533
Zheng, L., Zhang, X., & Cui, P. (2019). The role of technology-facilitated peer assessment and supporting strategies : a meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1644603
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics agree to the following terms:
Creative Commons License
Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The premise offers all authors of journal articles their research openly available, free access, and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors permit others to use the content of publications in Premise in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of Premise are required to cite the original source, including the author's name, Premise as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume, number, article page and DOI.
