CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE FOUND IN STUDENTS’ CONVERSATIONS OF PRAGMATIC CLASS
(1) STKIP Sidoarjo,Indonesia
(2) STKIP Sidoarjo, Indonesia
(3) STKIP Sidoarjo, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Pragmatics is a relatively new branch of linguistics. Pragmatics can be interpreted as a branch of linguistics that studies the meaning intended by speakers or, more often, studying language in terms of language speakers. Language plays an important role in communication. This role will impact the interlocutor's acceptance of the speaker. Sometimes, spoken language functions in a different form. What is said with what is intended is sometimes different. This study will be discussed in conversational implicature. Conversational implicature tries to analyze a conversation to obtain its true meaning. The concept of conversational implicature explains the differences between what is said and what is implied. Humor is the mental ability to find, express, or appreciate something funny or uncommon. Each implicature has a specific intent and purpose by each speaker.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdalhakeem, S., & Mubarak, A. (2019). The humour of still standing contradictions between implicature and presupposition . Dirasat, Human and Social Sciences. https://archives.ju.edu.jo/index.php/hum/article/view/105060
Abdurahmonov, S. &. (2021). Expression of pragmatic meaning in lexical units. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 189-192 https://dx.doi.org/10.15863
Akmal, S., & Yana, D. U. (2020). Conversational implicature analysis in “Kingdom of Heaven” movie script by William Monahan. Buletin Al-Turas, 335-350. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/76be/8e2eea4bef427b2582f6ba01a594317f54fa.pdf
Allot, N. E. (2018). Conversational implicature. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.205
Amirsheibani, M. (2020). Designing and validating an English humor comprehension (EHCT) based on Grice's Conversational Maxims. Journal of Critical Reviews, 587-604. https://profdoc.um.ac.ir/paper-abstract-1079933.html
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theory of humor. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100016704
Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (2017). Humor and pragmatics. The Routledge handbook of language and humor, 174-188. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162
Bouton, L. F. (1994). Conversational implicature in a second language: Learned slowly when not deliberately taught. Journal of Pragmatics, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90065-5
Cahyono, B. Y. (1997). Effectiveness of journal writing in supporting skills in writing English Essays. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 221.xx(Y). http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jip.v4i0.1314
George, E. J., & Mamidi, R. (2020). Conversational implicatures in English dialogue: Annotated dataset. Procedia Computer Science, 2316-2323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.251
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In syntax and semantics III: speech acts. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
Holmes, J., & Mara, M. (2002). Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends. Humor, 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.006
Horn, L. (2005). Current issues in neo-Gricean pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, pp. 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.2.191
Huang, X. (2020). An analysis of verbal humor in 2 broke girls from the perspective of conversational implicature. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, pp. 969–976. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1008.16
Kristina Gultom, S. C. (2020). Implication of humor in humanconversations: Seeing from pragmatics point of view. JELITA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature. https://jurnal.stkipmb.ac.id/index.php/jelita/article/view/41
Kurniasari, W. (2018). A pragmatic analysis of conversational implicature of humor practices in how to train your dragon. Sastra Inggris-Quill, 389-397. https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/index.php/quill/article/view/14544
Lee, V. (2018). Contextualizing translation theories: aspects of Arabic–English interlingual communication. Perspectives, pp. 292–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1358918
Mao, T., & He, S. (2021). An Integrated Approach to Pragmatic Competence: Its Framework and Properties. Sage Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211011472
Martini, A. (2018). Conversational implicature of Indonesian students in daily conversation. Indonesian EFL Journal, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v4i1.889
Parker, F. (1986). Linguistics for non linguist. London: Taylor and Francis. https://lccn.loc.gov/85029106
Prastyaningsih, E., & Harida, R. (2021). The analysis of conversational implicature in New Moon Movie. SALIENCE: English Language, Literature, and Education. https://jurnal.stkippgriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/Salience/article/view/120
Qiu, J. (2019). Pragmatic analysis of verbal humor in friends—based on cooperative principle. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, pp. 935–940. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0908.06
Regoniel, P. A. (2023). Exploring phenomena: A brief guide to conducting descriptive qualitative research. Research-based Articles. Retrieved on June 13, 2023. https://simplyeducate.me/2023/04/10/descriptive-qualitative-research/
Taguchi, N. (2005). Comprehending implied meaning in English as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, pp. 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00329.x
Taguchi, N., & Yamaguchi, S. (2019). Implicature comprehension in L2 pragmatics research. The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics, 31-46. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=ntKFDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT46&dq=Implicature+comprehension+in+L2+pragmatics+research&ots=dQv-WLVVbA&sig=eSBYrOIJjZrSx48QgTkf1VGOO0Q
Tsvetkova, E. T. (2022). Cases of misunderstanding: reasons why conversational implicatures might fail. Balkan Journal of Philosophy, 73-78. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1035494
Turmudi, D. (2020). English Scholarly Publishing Activities in the Industrial Revolution 4.0: What, Why, and How?. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(1), 5 2-63. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i1.1890
Widiana, Y. (2015). A pragmatics study on jokes and the implicature in broadcast messages . World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, pp. 3145–3148. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338562
Yeboah, J. (2021). The principles underlying what is communicated and not said: A cursory discussion of grice’s cooperative principle and its maxims. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistic, Vol (No) 10–17. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.5.2
Yudith, Y., Natsir, M., & Lubis, I. S. (2021). Conversational implicature in in the heart of the sea movie. Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni dan Budaya, 201-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v5i2.3380
Yulianti, S., Arafah, B., Arafah, B., Idris, A. M., Samsur, N., & Arafah, A. N. (2022). Conversational implicatures on Saturday night live talk show. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 189-197. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1301.22
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v12i3.8418
Refbacks
- Agenda
- Pendaftaran
- Proyek
- Kiano88
- impian789
- Informasi
- Tugas
- Kiano88
- Aplikasi
- Platform
- Diskusi
- Media
- Layanan
- Kiano88
- Kiano88
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
Scientific Publication Unit (UPI)
Gd. HI, Lt1 Kampus 1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 116 A
Kota Metro Lampung 34145 Indonesia
Email : help.upi@ummetro.ac.id
Phone : +62-725-42445
Fax : +62-725-42454
Mobile : +62-8570914-1060
Certificate of Accreditation (Volume 11 No 1, 2022-Volume 15 No 2, 2026
