THE AUTHENTICITY OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT FOR THE TWELFTH GRADERS OF SMK(VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL) NEGERI 4 SURAKARTA

Nurul Hidayati(1*),

(1) An English Teacher of SMKN 4(State Vocational High School) Surakarta Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


The new curriculum applied in Indonesia recommended the use of  authentic assessment. This study  deals with the authenticity of English assessment. This  research aims at finding empirical facts about what type of assessments are used, describing the authenticity of the assessments, showing teachers’ understanding to the assessment system and identifying problems encountered in applying authentic assessment. The method used is qualitative research,   and the data was collected by observation, interview and content analysis. The findings are firstly, the teacher used three types of assessment : (a) Formative Test covering affective-cognitive-psychomotoric aspects (b) Mid Term Test (c)  Semester Test. Secondly, the Formative Test had high level of authenticity, while the Mid Term Test and Semester Test had low authenticity. Thirdly, the scoring system used was the Criterion Reference Test which refers to Minimum Mastery Criteria. (4) There were at least four  problems in applying authentic assessment : (a) the teacher felt overburdened with too many assessment formats (b) the inconsistency in regulation cause confusion for teachers (c) insufficient  learning facilities caused ineffectivity (d) insufficient IT system needed improvement. The school had been doing efforts to overcome the problems. 


Keywords


authenticity, assessment, and authentic assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alabdelwahab, Sharif Q., (2002), Portofolio Assessment : A qualitative investigation of portofolio self-assessment practices in an intermediate EFL Classroom, Saudi Arabia, Ohio State University

Anderson, Neil J, (2012). Student Involvement in Assessment : Healthy Self-Assessment and Effective Peer Assessment. The Cambridge Guide to Language Assessment. Edited by Christine Coombe, Peter Davidson, Barry O’Sullivan, Stephen Stoynoff. Cambridge University Press.New York.

Arter, J. A., & Spandel, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational measurement: Issues and practice, 11(1), 36-44.

Azis, A. (2014). Indonesian junior secondary school teachers' conceptions of assessment: A mixed methods study.

Bagley, Pamela Bryan,(1995)."Authentic Assessment: How Do Portfolios Fit the Picture?" . UNF Theses and Dissertations. Paper 220. Retrieved April, 2015 from http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/220)

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Allyn & Bacon.

Chen , Yuh-Mei. (2006), EFL Instruction and Assessment with Portfolios: A Case Study in Taiwan, The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, March 2006 Volume 8 Issue 1.

Gronlund, N.E. (2003). Assessment of Student Achievement. 7th ed. Custom edition for the University of Alberta.

Hymes, D. L. (1991). The Changing Face of Testing and Assessment: Problems and Solutions. AASA Critical Issues Report. American Association of School Administrators, 1801 North Moore St., Arlington, VA 22209-9988.

Komarudin. (2015). Penilaian Autentik pada mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti ( Studi Analisis Kurikulum 2013 Kelas VIII Semester 1 di SMP Negeri 4 Yogyakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015). Unpublished thesis. Post Graduate Program of UIN Sunana Kalijaga

Lee , Sujin.(2010). Current practice of Classroom Speaking Assessment in Secondary Schools in South Korea, A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Masters of Arts (MA) in Applied Linguistics, The University of Queensland.

Mertler, Craig A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25). Retrieved April 22, 2015 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25 .

M. Stecher, Mikala L.Rahn, Alen Ruby, Martha Naom ll, Abby Robyn, Brian Ward. (2000). UsingAlternative assessment in Vocational Education. National Center for Reseach in Vocational Education University of California . Berkeley.

Newman, Fred M., King, M.Bruce, Carmichael, Dana L. (2007). Authentic Instruction and Assessment: Common Standards Rigor and Relevance in Teaching Academic Subject, The Iowa Department of Education.Des Moines.

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2011). PENGEMBANGAN MODEL ASESMEN OTENTIK DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA. Cakrawala Pendidikan Edisi November 2009.

O'Malley, J. M., & Pierce, L. V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co

Paragae, I G.A.P.N.S.; Marhaeni, A.A.I.N.; Paragae, N.Dantes. (2013). , “Teacher Made Assessment Authenticity in Senior High Schools and Its Contribution to Students’ English Achievement”, e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Volume 1

Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio. Educational leadership, 48(5).

Stecher, B. M., & Bohrnstedt, G. (2000). Class size reduction in California: The 1998-99 evaluation findings.

White, Eddy , (2009). Student Perspectives of Peer Assessment for Learning in a Public Speaking Course , Asian EFL Journal – Professional Teaching Articles. Vol. 33. Jamuary

Winograd, P. and F. D. Perkins. (1995). Authentic assessment in the classroom: principles and practices. In A handbook for student performance assessment in an era of restructuring, edited by R. E. Blum and J. A. Arter. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

----------------, (2014). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 Tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan dasar dan Menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v5i1.429

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Nurul Hidayati

License URL: http://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/english/article/view/429

=====================

Publisher

Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Unit Publikasi Ilmiah ( Scientific Publication Unit)

Address:

Gedung HI Lt 1, Ruang UPT Publikasi Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara No.116, Iringmulyo, Metro Timur, Kota Metro, Lampung 34111
Phone/WA: +6285709141060

Email:upi@ummetro.ac.id 

======================

e-ISSN-2442-482x  p-ISSN-2089-3355

Download Premise Official Template  June -October 2022

Certificate