EFFECTIVENESS OF USING CALL FOR TEACHING WRITING

Anna Nurawalia(1*),

(1) Universitas Muslim Buton
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Development of the networking system today give some possibilities for studentslearning language through CALL. Although there is a great benefit of computer assisted language learning on learners’ language performance in fact, yet many schools and universities do not utilize their classrooms and their computer laboratory to teach. The study used quantitative-qualitative data to investigate the effectiveness of CALL.Approach implemented in this research was experimental one group pre- post-test design. The total population of this study was 157 of the Health Department students in University of Aisyiah Yogyakarta of academic year 2019/2020 who took English For Daily Usage. Data was collected by student’s pre and post test and the interviewing process. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 21. The students’ achievement data were taken from pre- and post-test tests’ result. This study serves other evidences toward how effective of using e-learning in our local teaching and learning environment supported by student’s higher proficiency score of their writing post-test. Approach applied and showed in https://unisayogya.learnsocial.online/ may overcome some shortcomings of traditional method of writing to some extent by providing feedback on students’ mistakes or errors.

 


Keywords


Keywords: CALL, Writing, EFL, English Language Teaching, Hybrid

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agung, A. S. N., & Surtikanti, M. W. (2020). Students’ Perception of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study on the English Students of STKIP Pamane Talino. SOSHUM : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v10i2.1316

Al-haq, F., & Al-Sobh, M. A. (2010). The effect of a web-based writing instructional EFL program on enhancing the performance of Jordanian secondary students. The JALT CALL Journal, 6(3), 189–218. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v6n3.101

Alberth. (2010a). How Effective Are Technology-Enhanced Teaching Techniques in the EFL Classroom ? December, 334.

Alberth. (2010b). School of Social Sciences and Asian Languages How Effective Are Technology-Enhanced Teaching Techniques in the EFL Classroom?

Arslan, R. Ş., & Şahin-Kizil, A. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.486575

Bahari, A. (2020). Computer-assisted language proficiency assessment tools and strategies. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1726738

Chuo, T.-W. (2007). The Effects of the WebQuest Writing Instruction Program on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance, Writing Apprehension, and Perception. TESL-EJ, 11(3).

DeSouza, E., & Fleming, M. (2003). A comparison of in-class and online quizzes on student exam performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940941

FitzPatrick, E., & McKeown, D. (2020). How to Use Audio Feedback to Improve Students’ Writing Quality. Teaching Exceptional Children, 53(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920908901

Frazier, S., & Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. In TESOL Quarterly. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587655

Gillespie, J., & McKee, J. (1999). Does it fit and does it make any difference? integrating call into the curriculum. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.12.5.441.5692

Hasan, M. K., & Akhand, M. M. (2010). Approaches to Writing in EFL/ESL Context: Balancing Product and Process in Writing Class at Tertiary Level. Journal of NELTA, 15(1–2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v15i1-2.4612

Islam, M. S., Hasan, M. K., Sultana, S., Karim, A., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). English language assessment in Bangladesh today: principles, practices, and problems. In Language Testing in Asia (Vol. 11, Issue 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00116-z

Jacobs, H. L. et al. (1981). Testing ESL composition : a practical approach. January 1981, 139.

Jiang, J. (2021). High school English teachers’ use of code-switching in English class in China.

Kara, M., Kukul, V., & Çakır, R. (2021). Self-regulation in Three Types of Online Interaction: How Does It Predict Online Pre-service Teachers’ Perceived Learning and Satisfaction? Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00509-x

Khothori, K., JOURNAL, N. S.-E., & 2020, U. (2020). Students’ Perception on the Video Used by English Teachers as Instructional Media. Elitejournal.Org, 2(e-ISSN: 2580-9946 p-ISSN: 2580-9938), 127–142.

Lam, R. (2015). Understanding EFL Students’ Development of Self-Regulated Learning in a Process-Oriented Writing Course. TESOL Journal, 6(3), 527–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.179

Medicine, D. C. (2007). Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversies. In ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.7-1-37

Michelli, M. P. (2013). The Relationship between Attitudes and Achievement in Mathematics among Fifth Grade Students. In Honors College.

Mukama, E. (2008). Students’ interaction with web-based literature: towards dissolution of language boundaries. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 4(5), 478–495. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2008.022065

Solihati, N., & Mulyono, H. (2017). A hybrid classroom instruction in Second Language Teacher Education (SLTE): A critical reflection of teacher educators. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(5), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i05.6989

Spataro, C., & Canavosio, A. (2011). Combining CLT and CALL in the English Language II Classroom. Journal.Berjaya.Edu.My.

Ting, M. (2020). Teaching Tertiary EFL Writing in a Blended Mode. Ijee.Org, 9(ISSN: 2278-4012), 222–230.

Tsou, W. (2008). The effect of a web-based writing program in college english writing classes. Proceedings - The 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2008, 874–876. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2008.22

Turmudi, D. (2017). Rethinking Academic Essay Writing : Selected Genres in Comparison. Premise Journal, 6(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v6i2.1052

Turmudi, D. (2020). Utilizing a web-based technology in blended EFL academic writing classes for university students Utilizing a web- based technology in blended EFL academic writing classes for university students. Journal of Physics: Conference Serie, 1517(012063), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1517/1/012063

Wahyudin, A. Y. (2018). The impact of online peer feedback on EFL students’ writing at tertiary level. BAHTERA : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21009/bahtera.171.1

Warnock, S. (2010). Teaching Writing Online. NCTE (National Council of Teacher of English), 1.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v10i1.3565

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics



Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro 

Scientific Publication Unit (UPI)

Gd. HI, Lt1 Kampus 1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro 

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 116 A 

Kota Metro Lampung 34145  Indonesia 

Email  : help.upi@ummetro.ac.id

Phone : +62-725-42445 

Fax     : +62-725-42454

Mobile : +62-8570914-1060

Certificate of Accreditation (Volume 11 No 1, 2022-Volume 15 No 2, 2026

 

 

 

 

 

Publisher

Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Unit Publikasi Ilmiah (Scientific Publication Unit)

Address:

Gedung HI Lt 1, Ruang UPT Publikasi Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara No.116, Iringmulyo, Metro Timur, Kota Metro, Lampung 34111
Phone/WA: +6285709141060

Email:upi@ummetro.ac.id 

======================

e-ISSN-2442-482x  p-ISSN-2089-3345

Download Premise Official Template  June -October 2023

Certificate