Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions on the Relationship between Learning Program Design Course and Their Teaching Preparations

Elizabeth Liza(1*), Ouda Teda Ena(2),

(1) Sanata Dharma University
(2) Sanata Dharma University
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Learning Program Design is one of the compulsory courses offered to the English Language Education Study Program (ELESP) students to prepare for their teaching. This study is aimed to find out and to identify the possible relationship between Learning Program Design course and students’ teaching preparations. A survey study was conducted. The instrument used was questionnaire. A total of 30 students participated in this study. The perceptions of the pre-service teachers were obtained from their self-evaluations. The results of this study showed that most of the respondents had positive attitudes. They perceived that Learning Program Design Course had positive contributions to their teaching preparations.


Keywords


perceptions, teaching preparations, learning program design course, self-evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrade, M.R. (n.d.). Monitoring student performance with self-evaluation checklists: An Ongoing Case Study. Retrieved February 22, 2015, from http://www.jrc.sophia.ac.jp/courses/pdf/kiyou2701.pdf

Ary et al. (1990). Introduction to research in education (4th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Group, Thompson Learning.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Borich, G. D. (1996). Effective teaching methods (3th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice hall, Inc.

Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles of language learning and teaching (2th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Dick, W., Carey, L., Carey, J.O. (2005). The systematic of instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Gilmore, J. B. (1973). Learning and student self evaluation. Journal of College Science Teaching, 3(1), 54-57.

Gordon, P. A., & Huitt, W. G. (n.d.). Student evaluations of colleges instructors. Patterson St: Valdosta State University.

Hunt, G., Wiseman, D., Touzel, T. J. (2009). Effective teaching: preparation and implementation.Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher.

J. Papier, S. Thomas, T. McBride, N. Prinsloo, L. Daniel, J. Martin & Bartlett. (2005). Developing learning programs. South African Authority. Retrieved February 22, 2015, from http://www.saqa.org.za/docs/guide/2005/dlp.pdf

Jacobs, C., & Rennekamp, R. (n.d.). Program design. Lexington: University of Kentucky.

Kastrati, S. (2013). Student self-evaluation in albanian language. Rome-Italy. Journal of

Educational and Social Research MCSER, 3(7), 431-435.

Kennedy, C. (1989). Language planning and english language teaching. Birmingham: Prentice hall International (UK) Ltd.

Lew, M. D. N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011b). Self-reflection and academic performance: Is there a relationship? Advances in Health Science Education, 16, 529-545.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9298-z

Lucas, R. I. G. (2008). A Study on Portfolio Assessment as an Effective Student Self-Evaluation SchemeZ. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 16(1), 23-32.

Miron, M. (1988). Students’ evaluation and instructors’ self evaluation of university instruction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Netherlands. Higher Education, 17, 175-181.

Richards, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (1999). Language teaching awareness: A guide to exploring beliefs and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmidt, H. G., Lew, M. D. N. (2011). Self-reflection and academic performance: is there a relationship?. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 16(4), 529–545.

Schwartz, M. (n.d.). the Learning and teaching office. Research Associate. Retrieved February 22, 2015, from http://www.ryeson.ca/content/dam/lt/resources/handouts/SelfEvaluation.pdf

Tim Penyusun. (2007). Panduan Akdemik untuk Dosen dan Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Tutyandari, C., Prasetyo, H., Kristiyani, C., & Bram, B. (Eds.). (2010). Panduan akademik program studi pendidikan bahasa Inggris. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma Univeristy.

Wiersma, W. (1995). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: A Simon and Schuster Company.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v8i2.2329

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 PJEE@2019

e-ISSN-2442-482x  p-ISSN-2089-3355

Download Premise Official Template  2020

Certificate