A SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS OF SIMPLE SENTENCES IN KEMBHANG BABUR
(1) Universitas Madura
(2) Universitas Madura, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Madura, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Syntax is the study of the principles and processes by which sentence that it is constructed in particular language. Whereas that every language in the world certainly has different structure. This research aim to answer: (1) What are kinds of simple sentence found in Kembhang Babur books? (2) What are the differences between English and Madurese in simple sentences? This research is a descriptive qualitative research, descriptively describing the syntactic structures of simple sentences in Kembhang Babur book. The writer followed the rule of the qualitative which the data describe in words as the basis of interpreting data. Words are of utmost importance to qualitative researchers. There are three kinds of simple sentences found in Kembhang Babur book could be classified into: (a) Affirmative sentences, (b) Negative sentences (c) Interrogative sentences. The differences in English sentence is; if this affirmative sentence Aux there is after NP, but in the interrogative sentence Aux there is before NP and there is auxiliary “do/does” as interrogative verb. In Madurese sentence is marked by the addition of the word “apah” which is put before NP. “Apah” is as question word in Madurese, not as an auxiliary.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bianchi, V. (2002). Headed relative clauses in generative syntax – Part II. Glot International, 6(8), 1–13.
Bohnet, B., Nivre, J., Boguslavsky, I., Farkas, R., Ginter, F., & Hajič, J. (2013). Joint Morphological and Syntactic Analysis for Richly Inflected Languages. Transactions of the Association for Computational
Linguistics, 1(2012), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00238
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. A comprehensive guide Spoken and written English Grammar and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cohen, S. B., & Smith, N. A. (2007). Edinburgh Research Explorer Joint Morphological and Syntactic Disambiguation. 208–217.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Lincoln: SAGE Publications, Inc.
De Vincenzi, M. (1996). Syntactic Analysis in Sentence Comprehension: Effects of Dependency Types and Grammatical Constraints. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708422
Kaan, E. (2002). Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in processing subject-verb dependencies: An ERP study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014978917769
Kaefiyah, I. F. (2016). A Syntactic Analysis on Sentences Found in “ Go Diego Go ” eps . The Artic Rescue. A . Introduction. 3(2), 1–15.
Koopman, H., Sportiche, D., & Stabler, E. (2003). An Introduction to Syntactic Analysis and Theory. Unpublished Manuscript, (April), 246. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.122.5914&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Marcus, M., Santorini, B., & Marcinkiewicz, M. (1993). Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2), 313.
Maria, A., Di Sciullo, A. M., & Fong, S. (2000). Morpho-Syntax Parsing. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.75.17dis
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. Washington DC: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Morley, D.G. (2000). Syntax in Functional Grammar. An Introduction to Lexicon grammar in Systemic Linguistic. London: Paston Pre Press. Ltd
Moubaiddin, A., Tuffaha, A., Hammo, B., & Obeid, N. (2013). Investigating the syntactic structure of Arabic sentences. 2013 1st International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing and Their Applications, ICCSPA 2013, (January 2014).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSPA.2013.6487275
Putrayasa, I. B. (2019). Syntactical Analysis of Essays. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n2.307
Randall, A. (2006). President’s report: Classification and terminologies. Health Information Management Journal, 35(3), 4–5.
Rozakis, L. (2003). English Grammar for the Utterly Confused. USA: McGrawHill.
Srijono , Djoko. (2010). An Introductory Course of Linguistic. Muhammaditah University Press (MUP)
Tiono, N. I. (2003). An Analysis on Syntactic and Semantic Factors Found in Newspaper Headlines. K@ta: A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature, 5(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.5.1.67-83
Wang, Q. (2010). Drawing Tree Diagrams: Problems and Suggestions. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 926–934. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.6.926-934
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: Critique of just and carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103(4), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.761
Wongwattana, U. S. (2015). Complexities of Thai Copular Constructions. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 8(1976), 97–120.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v8i2.2112
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 PJEE@2019
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
Scientific Publication Unit (UPI)
Gd. HI, Lt1 Kampus 1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 116 A
Kota Metro Lampung 34145 Indonesia
Email : help.upi@ummetro.ac.id
Phone : +62-725-42445
Fax : +62-725-42454
Mobile : +62-8570914-1060
Certificate of Accreditation (Volume 11 No 1, 2022-Volume 15 No 2, 2026
