INNOVATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTION AND EXPERIENCE OF EFL STUDENTS IN SIDOARJO

Hidayatul Ummah Al-Imamah(1*), Nunung Nurjati(2), Endah Yulia Rahayu(3), Nico Irawan(4),

(1) English Department, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) English Department, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia
(3) English Department, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia
(4) English Department, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


In contemporary secondary EFL (English as a Foreign Language) education, formative assessments play a critical role in enhancing students' language proficiency. This research explores the perceptions and experiences of EFL students in Sidoarjo regarding formative assessment practices. The central research question focuses on how students' perceptions and experiences with formative assessments influence their engagement and language development. Employing a phenomenological approach, qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews and classroom observations with 25 secondary EFL students. Thematic analysis identified recurring patterns and themes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how these students perceive and experience formative assessment practices. Findings reveal that students perceive their experiences with interactive tools like Kahoot! and Quizizz as highly engaging and motivating, which they believe contributes to a more dynamic and participatory learning environment. Additionally, students' experiences with timely and constructive feedback were pivotal in helping them recognize and correct mistakes, thereby improving their language skills. Peer assessment and self-reflection were also seen as fostering a more student-centered learning environment, though some students encountered challenges in consistently understanding and applying these methods. These challenges underscore the need for better support and resources to ensure effective implementation. The research concludes that well-designed formative assessments, when aligned with students' perceptions and experiences, can substantially improve engagement and language proficiency. Recommendations include integrating interactive tools, emphasizing constructive feedback, and promoting peer assessment and self-reflection. Future research should explore the long-term impacts of formative assessments on EFL learning outcomes. This study underscores the transformative potential of formative assessments in EFL education and advocates for continuous support to enhance their effective implementation.


Keywords


EFL education; formative assessments; student engagement; interactive tools; peer assessment; self-reflection; language proficiency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews. In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation: Fourth Edition (pp. 492–505). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19.

Agee, J. (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390902736512

Almahal, E. A., Osman, A. A. A., Tahir, M. E., Hamdan, H. Z., Gadda, A. A., Alkhidir, O. T. A., Gasmalla, H. E. E. (2023). Fostering Formative Assessment: teachers’ perception, practice and challenges of implementation in four Sudanese medical schools, a mixed-method study. BMC Medical Education, 23:247. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04214-3

Alhazmi, A. A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022). Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134

Aprianto, D., & Zaini, N. (2019). The Principles of Language Learning and Teaching in Communication Skill Developments. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v3i1.1281

Badil, ., Dildar Muhammad, Dr. D. M., Zeenaf Aslam, Z. A., Kashif Khan, K. K., Anny Ashiq, A. A., & Uzma Bibi, U. B. (2023). Phenomenology Qualitative Research Inquiry: A Review Paper. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i03.626

Baran-Łucarz, M. (2019). Formative Assssment in the English as a Foreign Language Classroom in Secondary Schools in Poland. Report on a Mixed-Method Study. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20192.309.327

Berry, R. (2011). Assessment trends in Hong Kong: Seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.527701

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and Classroom Learning, Assessment in Education, 5(1).

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment, PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 80(2)

Blitman, D. (2014). What linguistic nativism tells us about innateness. Philosophia Scientiae, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1001

Bonyadi, A. (2023). Phenomenology as a research methodology in teaching English as a foreign language. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00184-z

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, 2.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, H. D. & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Third Edition Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. Hoboken: Pearson Education, Inc.

Brookhart, S.M. & Moss., C. M. (2009). Advancing Formative Assessment in Every Classroom a Guide for Instructional Leaders. Alexandria, Virginia USA: ASCD

Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. In Neurological Research and Practice (Vol. 2, Issue 1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., Dicenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. In Oncology Nursing Forum (Vol. 41, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

Chen, D. & Zhang, L. (2017). Formative Assessment of Academic English Writing for Chinese EFL Learners. TESOL International Journal, 12 (2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1247811.pdf.

Chris, M. J. (2021). What are Quantitative and Qualitative Research? What Information Should You Include in the Methodology? www.sjsu.edu/writingcenterWrittenby

Clark, I., & Journal, F. (2011). Policy, Perspectives and Practice Formative Assessment: Policy, Perspectives and Practice. Florida Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 4 (2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ931151.pdf.

Cooper, R. (2016). Decoding Coding via The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers by Johnny Saldaña. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2009.2856

Creswell, J. W. (2016). 30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage

Creswell, J. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publication. In Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (Vol. 3, Issue June).

Creswell, W. J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9).

Dikko, M. (2016). Establishing construct validity and reliability: Pilot testing of a qualitative interview for research in takaful (Islamic insurance). Qualitative Report, 21(3), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2243.

Dowling, M. (2007). From Husserl to Van Manen. A Review of Different Phenomenological Approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44 (1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.026

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

Engle, M. (2015). Book Review: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214014556146

Fukuda, S. T., Lander, B. W., Pope, C. J. (2022). Formative Assessmnt for Learning How to Learn: Exploring University Student Learning Experiences. RELC Journal, 53 (1), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220925927.

Flick, U. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070

Gallardo, C. (2020). Seeing Formative Assessments from a Broad Perspective. The Nebraska Educator. https://doi.org/10.32873/unl.dc.ne010.

Greenstein, L. (2010). What Teachers Really Need to Know about Formative Assessment. Alexandria, Virginia USA: ASCD

Greening, N. (2019). Phenomenological Research Methodology. Scientific Research Journal, VII(V). https://doi.org/10.31364/scirj/v7.i5.2019.p0519656

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Guo, W. Y., & Yan, Z. (2019). Formative and summative assessment in Hong Kong primary schools: students’ attitudes matter. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571993

Heale, R., & Forbes, D. (2013). Understanding triangulation in research. In Evidence-Based Nursing (Vol. 16, Issue 4, p. 98). https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101494

Hegazy, H. (2019). Teachers’ perceived understanding of formative assessment and how it impacts their classroom practice: A case-study investigation. Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, 19(2).

Hopfenbeck, T. N., Zhang, Z., Sun, S. Z., Robertson, P., McGrane, J. A. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities for Classroom-Based Formative Assessment and AI: A Perspective Article. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1270700.

Indeed Editorial Team. (2022). What Is Research Methodology? (Why It’s Important and Types) | Indeed.com. 2022, 1–12. Retrieved from https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/research-methodology

Irfiana, K., Purnawarman, P., Sukyadi, D. (2023). Exploring EFL Teachers’ Assessment for 21st Century Skills: Practices and Challenges. AIP Publishing AIP Conference Proceedings, 2621 (1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142352.

Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. Summative Assessment: Impacts on Academic Motivation, Attitude toward Learning, Test Anxiety, and Self-Regulation Skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4.

Ismail, M. A. A., Ahmad, A., Mohammad, J. A. M., Fakri, N. M. R. M., Nor, M. Z. M., & Pa, M. N. M. (2019). Using Kahoot! as a formative assessment tool in medical education: A phenomenological study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1658-z

Jalilzadeh, K., & Coombe, C. (2023). Constraints in employing learning-oriented assessment in EFL classrooms: teachers’ perceptions. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00222-8

Rutledge, P. B., & Hogg, J. L. C. (2020). In‐Depth Interviews. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology (pp. 1–7). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0019

Johnson, C. C., Sondergeld, T. A., Walton, J. B. (2019). A Study of the Implementation of Formative Assessment in Three Large Urban Districts. American Educational Research Journal, XX. X (1-31). https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219842347.

Kilickaya, F. (2017). Improving Formative Assessment in Language Classrooms Using GradeCam Go!. Teaching English with Technology, 17 (4), 78-92. http://www.tewtjournal.org/s

Klinke, M. E., & Fernandez, A. V. (2023). Taking phenomenology beyond the first-person perspective: conceptual grounding in the collection and analysis of observational evidence. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09796-1

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London. Sage publications. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3).

Lookman, M., Khan, H., & Akter, M. (2020). Article in Innovation of Vocational Technology Education. XVI(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v16i2.27815

Lolkus, M., Kenney, R., Maeda, Y. (2022). Developing Formative Assessment Practices in Instruction: Recommendations from a Meta- Aggregation. Practical Assessment Research, and Evaluation, 27 (26). https://doi.org/10.7275/pare.1339

Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021). A Review of Feedback Models and Theories: Descriptions, Definitions, and Conclusions. In Frontiers in Education, (Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.720195

Lungu, M. (2022). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publication. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(1).

Majid, M. A. A., Othman, M., Mohamad, S. F., Lim, S. A. H., & Yusof, A. (2017). Piloting for Interviews in Qualitative Research: Operationalization and Lessons Learnt. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i4/2916

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. In The JosseyBass higher and adult education series (Vol. 2nd). https://doi.org/10.1097/NCI.0b013e3181edd9b1

Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., Varpio, L. (2019). How Phenomenology Can Help us Learn from the Experiences of Others. National Library of Medicine, 8: 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2.

Ninomiya, S. (2016). The Possibilities and Limitations of Assessment for Learning: Exploring the Theory of Formative Assessment and the Notion of “Closing the Learning Gap” Educational Studies in Japan, 10(0). https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.10.79

Macdonald, D. M. (2022). Teacher Perspectives on Formative Assessment within a Primary Teacher Perspectives on Formative Assessment within a Primary Classroom Classroom. https://doi.org/10.25777/nmct-hd61

Maflah Alharbi, J. (2023). Insight into the Role of Interaction in Language Acquisition: Vygotsky’s Interactionist Theory of Language. Arab World English Journal, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no2.20

Maher, C., Hadfield, M., Hutchings, M., & de Eyto, A. (2018). Ensuring Rigor in Qualitative Data Analysis: A Design Research Approach to Coding Combining NVivo With Traditional Material Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918786362

Martínez-Huamán, E. L., Landa, J. P. A., Mendoza, V. E. L., & Plata, C. E. G. R. (2022). Formative Assessment: Component of Teaching-Learning Process in the University Context in Post-COVID-19. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(11). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.11.17

Matthews, B. (2017). Learning Landscapes: A Form of Formative Assessment Supporting Assessment Without Levels. Online Library of Education Research and Information, 98 (364). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1154747.

Mayssara A. Abo Supervised, Affiifi. (2019). in-Depth Interview (Wawancara Mendalam). Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 16-23.

Merriam, B Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative Research A guide to Design and Implementation. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series, 112(483).

MEYERS, P. (1996). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data by Herbert J. Rubin and Irene S. Rubin. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995. 302 + viii pages. $dollar;45.00. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-6782(96)90188-5

Montgomery, I. J. H. (2023). Formative Assessment in EFL Teaching: A Grounded Theory Study on the Change of teachers’ Formative Assessment Practices. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/3070816/Master-Thesis-SUBMISSION.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. United States of America: Sage Publications International Educational and Professional Publiser.

Muhd Al-Aarifin, I., Anisa, A., Jamilah, A.-M. M., Nik Mohd Rizal, M. F., Mohd Zarawi, M. N., & Mohamad Najib, M. P. (2019). Using Kahoot! as a formative assessment tool in medical education: A phenomenological study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1).

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789

Nandi, Ananya. (2023). National Education Policy 2020 - Challenges and Opportunities on The Educational System. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i03.3101

Naghdipour, B. (2017). Incorporating Formative Assessment in Iranian EFL Writing: A Case Study. The Curriculum Journal, 28 (2). https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2016.1206479

Ninomiya & Shuichi. (2016). The Possibilities and Limitations of Assessment for Learning: Exploring the Theory of Formative Assessment and the Notion of “Closing the Learning Gap”. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 10,79-91.

North, B. (2015). The Development of a Common Framework Scale of Language Proficiency Theoretical Studies in Language Acquisition. New York; Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1059-7

Nugroho, H. A. (2018). Efl teachers’ need of language proficiency professional development: When policy and practice collide. International Journal of Language Education, 2(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i2.6373

Ortamlarında, E., Çalışmaları, F., İçin, Y., Çerçeveler, T., Ve Prosedürler, Y., Yüksel, P., & Yıldırım, S. (2015). Theoretical Frameworks, Methods, and Procedures for Conducting Phenomenological Studies in Educational Settings. In Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (Vol. 6, Issue 1).

Ozan, C. & Kincal, R. Y. (2018). The Effects of Formative Assessment on Academic Achievement, Attitudes toward the Lesson, and Self-Regulation Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18 (1), 85-118. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1179831.pdf.

Panayiotis, A., & James, M. (2014). Exploring formative assessment in Primary School Classrooms: Developing a Framework of Actions and Strategies. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-918

Pakpahan, F. H., & Saragih, M. (2022). Theory Of Cognitive Development By Jean Piaget. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.52622/joal.v2i2.79

Patino, C. M., & Ferreira, J. C. (2018). Inclusion and exclusion criteria in research studies: Definitions and why they matter. In Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Vol. 44, Issue 2, p. 84). Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37562018000000088

Priest, H. (2002). An approach to the phenomenological analysis of data. In Nurse researcher (Vol. 10, Issue 2, pp. 50–63). https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2003.01.10.2.50.c5888

Priya, A. (2017). Phenomenological social research: some observations from the field. Qualitative Research Journal, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2016-0047

Puspitasari, E., & Aufar, A. (2021). A Phenomenological Exploration of EFL Students’ Experiences With Graded Readers. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 518. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210120.154.

Rahman, Kh. A., Hasan, Md. K., Namaziandost, E., Seraj. P. M. I. (2021). Implementing a Formative Assessment Model at the Secondary Schools: Attitudes and Challenges. Language Testing in Asia. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00136-3.

Rifayanti, R., Sofia, L., Purba, T. D. U., Amanda, S. P., & Merary, S. (2022). Phenomenological Studies: Adolescent Toxic Relationships. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsocial.2022.2.6.337

Ratan, S.K., Anand, T., Ratan, J. (2019). Formulation of Research Question - Stepwise Approach. Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons, 24 (1): 15-20. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fjiaps.JIAPS_76_18

Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2012). Qualitative Interviewing (2nd ed.): The Art of Hearing Data. In Qualitative Interviewing (2nd ed.): The Art of Hearing Data. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226651

Rudd, L.C. & Lambert, M. C (2011). Interaction Theory of Language Development. Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development, 830-831. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_1522

Rugg, D. (2010). An Introduction to Triangulation. UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Fundamentals. www.unaids.org.

Rutledge, P. B., & Hogg, J. L. C. (2020). In‐Depth Interviews. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, 1–7. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0019

Salahuddin, M. & Begum, M. (2020). Formative Assessment in English Classroom at Secondary Level: Knowledge and Practice of Teachers and Students. Education, Health & Behavior Studies Student Publications, 44. https://commons.und.edu/ehb-stu/6/.

Sari, S. M., & Sundawan, K. (2021). Contested Perspective from Undergraduate Students and Teachers on Formative Assessment: A Qualitative Study. RSF Conference Proceeding Series: Medical and Health Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.31098/cpmhs.v1i1.264

Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602

Selvan Arumugham, K., & Dhamodarem, J. (2018). Teachers’ Understandings Of Formative Assessment: A Phenomenology Study Among Malaysian Secondary School Teachers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340979203

Snyder, H. (1996). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data: Rubin, Herbert J. & Rubin, Irene S. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995. 302 pp. $21.95 (paperback) (ISBN 0-8039-5096-9). Library & Information Science Research, 18(2).

Sreekumar, D. (2023). What is Research Methodology? Definition, Types, and Examples. Paperpal By researcher.Life. https://paperpal.com/blog/academic-writing-guides/what-is-research-methodology.

Smit, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2018). Observations in Qualitative Inquiry: When What You See Is Not What You See. In International Journal of Qualitative Methods (Vol. 17, Issue 1). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918816766

Tindall, L. (2009). J.A. Smith, P. Flower and M. Larkin (2009), Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880903340091.

Trumbull, E., & Lash, A. (2013). Understanding Formative Assessment: Insight from Learning Theory and Measurement Theory. San Fransisco: WestEd.

VanPatten, B. (2018). Theories of Second Language Acquisition. In The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779194.030

Van der Kleij, F. M., Cumming, J. J., & Looney, A. (2018). Policy expectations and support for teacher formative assessment in Australian education reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1374924

Vassiliou, S., Papadima-Sophocleous, S., & Giannikas, C. N. (2022). Formative assessment in second language learning: a systematic review and an annotated bibliography. France: Research- Publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2022.60.9782383720133

Wicks, D. (2017). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd edition)The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd edition) Johnny Saldaña Sage 2015 ISBN-13: 978-1473902497. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 12(2).

Widiastuti, I. A. M. S. & Saukah, A. (2017). Formative Assessment in EFL Classroom Practices. Bahasa dan Seni Jurnal Bahasa Sastra Seni dan Pengajarannya, 45 (1), 050-063. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321628523.

Wijaya, K. F. (2022). Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Perceptions on Formative Assessment in Writing. Journal of English Teaching, 8 (1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i1.3359.

Williams, H. (2021). The meaning of “Phenomenology”: Qualitative and philosophical phenomenological research methods. Qualitative Report, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4587

Xie, F. (2021). Secondary Language Teachers’ Perspectives on Formative Secondary Language Teachers’ Perspectives on Formative Writing Assessments Writing Assessments. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations

Yang, R., & May, L. (2023). Understanding and Implementing Learning-Oriented Assessment: Evidence From Three Chinese Junior High School EFL Teachers. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2023-0210

Zeng, J. & Huang, L. (2021). Understanding Formative Assessment Practice in the EFL Exam- Oriented Context: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Educational Psychology, a Section of the Journal Frontiers in Psychology. 12:774159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774159.

Zhang, Z., & Crawford, J. (2023). EFL learners’ motivation in a gamified formative assessment: The case of Quizizz. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12034-7

Zahavi, D. (2019). Applied phenomenology: Why is it safe to ignore the epoché. Revista Da Abordagem Gestaltica, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.18065/RAG.2019v25n3.12




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i3.11015

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Authors

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro 

Scientific Publication Unit (UPI)

Gd. HI, Lt1 Kampus 1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro 

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 116 A 

Kota Metro Lampung 34145  Indonesia 

Email  : help.upi@ummetro.ac.id

Phone : +62-725-42445 

Fax     : +62-725-42454

Mobile : +62-8570914-1060

Certificate of Accreditation (Volume 11 No 1, 2022-Volume 15 No 2, 2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

Publisher

Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Unit Publikasi Ilmiah (Scientific Publication Unit)

Address:

Gedung HI Lt 1, Ruang UPT Publikasi Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara No.116, Iringmulyo, Metro Timur, Kota Metro, Lampung 34111
Phone/WA: +6285709141060

Email:upi@ummetro.ac.id 

======================

e-ISSN-2442-482x  p-ISSN-2089-3345

Download Premise Official Template  June -October 2023

Certificate