THE IMPACT OF WORDWALL ONLINE GAMES ON ENGLISH VOCABULARY MASTERY IN READING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i3.10838Keywords:
Vocabulary, Vocabulary Mastery, Wordwall Online Games, Recount Text ReadingAbstract
This quantitative quasi-experimental study examines vocabulary mastery differences between students taught with Wordwall Online Games and students taught with traditional learning methods. Conducted with 58 junior high school 8th graders, participants were divided into control and experimental groups. Vocabulary proficiency was assessed via an updated vocabulary level test administered through Google Forms, with data analyzed using paired sample t-tests. Findings indicate significant vocabulary improvement in both groups from pre- to post-test. Effect size calculations using Cohen's d revealed large effect values for both groups, with Cohen's d = 2.19718 for the experimental group. Cohen's d = 1.52645 for the control group, reflecting a difference of 0.67073. Despite both methods being practical, this difference suggests a notably stronger impact of Wordwall Online Games on vocabulary mastery than traditional media. Thus, while Wordwall enhances vocabulary acquisition more substantially, traditional media also plays a valuable role in vocabulary development, supporting its continued use in language education. This research could enhance vocabulary mastery in students' reading skills, encourage interactive teaching methods, and serve as a valuable resource for future studies on using Wordwall Online Games to improve vocabulary in junior high school.
References
Asigigan, S. I., & Samur, Y. (2021). The effect of gamified stem practices on students' intrinsic motivation, critical thinking disposition levels, and perception of problem-solving skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(2), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.1157
Burch, G. F., Giambatista, R., Batchelor, J. H., Burch, J. J., Hoover, J. D., & Heller, N. A. (2019). A Meta-analysis of the relationship between experiential learning and learning outcomes. In Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education (Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 239–273). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12188
Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 1(3), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. Bin. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302
Guaqueta, C. A., & Castro-Garces, A. Y. (2018). The use of language learning apps as a didactic tool for EFL vocabulary building. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n2p61
Hidayaty, A., Qurbaniah, M., & Setiadi, A. E. (2022). The influence of Wordwall on students' interests and learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v15i2.51691
Jannah, M., Supratman, J. W., Limun, K., & Muara Bangka Hulu, K. (2017). EFL students' perspectives on the use of wordwall.net as vocabulary learning media Article Info. Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt
Panmei, B., & Waluyo, B. (2023). The pedagogical use of gamification in English vocabulary training and learning in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010024
Pradini, P. C., & Adnyayanti, N. L. P. E. (2022). Teaching English vocabulary to young learners with wordwall application: An experimental study. Journal of Educational Study, 2(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.36663/joes.v2i2.351
Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., & Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14878
Sadeghi, K., Sağlık, E., Mede, E., Samur, Y., & Comert, Z. (2022). The effects of implementing gamified instruction on vocabulary gain and motivation among language learners. Heliyon, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11811
Schimmel, N., & Ness, M. (2017). The effects of oral and silent reading on reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 38(4), 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1278416
Shabrina, F., & Wahyu Taufiq. (2023). The effect of teaching English vocabulary on junior high school students by using wordwall.net. Borneo Educational Journal (Borju), 5(2), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v5i2.1353
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (pendekatan kuwantitatif,kuwalitatif,R&D). In Alfabbeta Pres. Alfabeta.
Téllez, A., GarcÃa, C. H., & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2015). Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 8(3), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2015.0303
Turmudi, D. (2020). English scholarly publishing activities in the industrial revolution 4 . 0 : What , Why , and How ? ELTEJ, 3(1), 52–63. http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/eltej/article/view/1890
Wati, M., & Januarty, R. (2022). Students’vocabulary achievement under wordwall media at SMP Negeri 23 Makassar. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Overseas Journal, 10(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.47178/teflo.v10i1.1617
Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated vocabulary levels test. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 33–69. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.168.1.02web
Yasmine Liong, A. N. A. P. G. M. Md. Y. (2019). Learn idioms in a fun and mobile way with quizizz. In Teaching and Teacher Education (Vol. 8, Issue 12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Zaindanu, Y., & Taufik Ihsan, M. (2021). The role of Google form as an assessment tool in ELT: a critical review of the literature. 1(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i1.49
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics agree to the following terms:

Creative Commons License
Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The premise offers all authors of journal articles their research openly available, free access, and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors permit others to use the content of publications in Premise in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of Premise are required to cite the original source, including the author's name, Premise as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume, number, article page and DOI.