THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER FEEDBACK TECHNIQUE TO TEACH WRITING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ CREATIVITY

Andianto - Andianto(1*),

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


The objectives of the research are to examine whether: (1) Peer Feedback Technique is more effective than Teacher Feedback Technique to teach writing for the tenth grade students of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Metro; (2) the students having high creativity have better writing ability than those having low creativity for the tenth grade students of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Metro; and (3) there is an interaction between teaching techniques and students’ creativity to teach writing for the tenth grade students of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Metro. The method applied in this research was an experimental study. It was conducted at the tenth grade students of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Metro. It consists of six classes. The Samples were two classes of six classes chosen by using cluster random sampling. Each class was divided into two groups (the students having high and low students’ creativity). The data were analyzed by using Multifactor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test of 2 x 2 and Tuckey test. Based on the data analysis, there are some research findings that can be drawn. They are (1) Peer Feedback Technique is more effective than Teacher Feedback Technique to teach writing for the tenth grade students of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Metro; (2) the students having high creativity have better writing ability than those having low creativity; (3) there is an interaction between teaching techniques and students’ creativity to teach writing in which Peer Feedback Technique is more appropriate to teach writing for students having high creativity and Teacher Feedback Technique is more appropriate to teach writing for students having low creativity. In short, the effect of teaching technique depends on students’ creativity.

Keywords


: peer feedback technique; teacher feedback technique; writing ability; creativity; experimental study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barkley.E.F.,Cross.K.P., & Major C.H. (2005). Collaborative Learning Techniques. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Byrne, Donn. (1997). Teaching Writing Skills (Longman Handbooks for Language Teachers). Edinburgh Gate: Longman.

Depdiknas, (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah No. 19, 2005. Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Farrah, M. (2012). The Impact of Peer Feedback on Improving the Writing Skills among Hebron University Students. An-Najah Univ. J. Res. (Humanities). Vol 26 (1)

Ferris, Dana. 2003. Response to Student Writing (Implications for Second Language Students. New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum Associates Publishers.

Hernowo. (2003). Quantum Writing. Bandung: Mizan Learning Center.

Hornby, A.S. (2010). Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary Eighth Edition, International Studetns’ Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hyland, K. and F. Hyland. (2006). Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, Ken. (2003). Second Language Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jones, Rusell and Wyse, Dominic. 2004. Creativity in the Primary Curiculum. London: David Fulton Publisher

Kaufman, James C. & Sternberg, Robert J. (2006). The International Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Keh, Claudia L. (1990). Feedback in the Writing Process: a Model and Methods for Implementation. ELT Journal. Volume 44/4 October 1990. Oxford University Press.

Kroll, B. (2003). Exploring the Dynamics of Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Murcia, Celce, Marianne and Elite Olshtein. (2000). Discourse and Context in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, David. (1998). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

.(2003). Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: Mc. Graw Hill.

Oshima A. & Hogue A. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing (3rd Edition). White Plains: Pearson Education. Inc.

Spratt, Mary and Alan. (2005). The Teaching Knowledge Test Course (TKT). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Srichanyachon, Napaporn. (2012). Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Learners’ Writing Development. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts. Vol 12 (1): 7-17




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v3i1.698

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Andianto - -



Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro 

Scientific Publication Unit (UPI)

Gd. HI, Lt1 Kampus 1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro 

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 116 A 

Kota Metro Lampung 34145  Indonesia 

Email  : help.upi@ummetro.ac.id

Phone : +62-725-42445 

Fax     : +62-725-42454

Mobile : +62-8570914-1060

Certificate of Accreditation (Volume 11 No 1, 2022-Volume 15 No 2, 2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

Publisher

Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Unit Publikasi Ilmiah (Scientific Publication Unit)

Address:

Gedung HI Lt 1, Ruang UPT Publikasi Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara No.116, Iringmulyo, Metro Timur, Kota Metro, Lampung 34111
Phone/WA: +6285709141060

Email:upi@ummetro.ac.id 

======================

e-ISSN-2442-482x  p-ISSN-2089-3345

Download Premise Official Template  June -October 2023

Certificate