PIVOT SYSTEM IN ARABIC COORDINATION SENTENCE: A SYNTACTIC TYPOLOGY STUDY

Authors

  • Dara Mubshirah Postgraduate Program in Linguistics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Mulyadi Mulyadi Postgraduate Program in Linguistics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i1.7929

Keywords:

Pivot System, Arabic, Coordination Sentence

Abstract

Coordination sentences are those that operate effectively in both written and spoken discourse. The pivot system will discuss the Arabic coordination sentence in this research. This study aimed to highlight the syntactic typology and pivot system of the Arabic coordination sentence. This study used a qualitative approach with descriptive and content analysis methods. This data was analyzed using the Miles and Huberman method. The data were obtained from the form of coordination sentences found in Arabic books and other sources that are considered relevant. The result showed that the Arabic coordinating sentences are formed by four types, namely (1) intransitive-intransitive, (2) intransitive-transitive, (3) transitive-intransitive, and (4) transitive-transitive. Eliminating FN for A and P in Arabic coordinating sentences differs from dropping FN for A and P in English and Arabic coordinating sentences. However, based on the syntactic constructions with indefinite verbs, Arabic grammar is the same as English and Indonesian. The findings of this study contribute insight and treasure to the wealth of science in syntactic typology.

References

Arsyandikayani. (2019). Pergeseran hubungan koordinasi dan subordinasi antarklausa dalam Bahasa Jawa (Pendekatan Tipologi Sintaksis)[Shifting coordination and subordination relations between clauses in Javanese (Syntactic Typology Approach]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Linguistiks Dan Sastra (SEMANTIKS), 1, 114–123.

Artawa, K. & J. (2021). Tipologi linguistik.

Basaria, I. (2013). Tipologi gramatikal dan sistem pivot bahasa Pakpak-Dairi[Grammatical typology and pivot system of Pakpak-Dairi language]. LITERA, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v12i01.1327

Evi, D. A. P. L. (2020). Types and Meaning of Metaphor in Song Lyrics.

Goodall, G. (2017). Coordination in syntax. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.36

Handayani, D., & Ritonga, M. (2022). Sistem pivot Bahasa Mandailing: Kajian tipologi bahasa[Mandailing language pivot system: A typological study of the language]. Kode : Jurnal Bahasa, 11(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.24114/kjb.v11i2.36130

Johanson, L. (2011). The semantics of clause linking: A cross-linguistic typology (review). Language, 87(1), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0014

Karenisa, K.-. (2019). Konjungsi bermakna ‘dan’ dalam bahasa Maanyan [Conjunction means 'and' in Maanyan]. SUAR BETANG, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v13i2.92

Maharani, M. H., Utara, U. S., & Utara, U. S. (2023). Konstruksi kausatif dalam bahasa Melayu Langkat [Causative constructions in Langkat Malay]. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, XIX(1).

Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. a, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed., Vol. 28, Issue 4). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/January 11, 2016

Mulyadi. (2016). Kalimat koordinasi bahasa Indonesia: Sebuah ancangan tipologi sintaksis [Sentence Coordination Indonesian: A Draft Syntactic Typology]. Bahasa Dan Sastra Logat, vol.3 No 2(May), 90–98.

Schachter, P. (1986). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Lingua, 69(1–2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(86)90083-5

Shukla, S. (2017). Research design. In Research in Social Science: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Issue September). file:///E:/Documents/dosen/buku Metodologi/[John_W._Creswell]_Research_Design_Qualitative,_Q(Bookos.org).pdf

Sinaga, L. D., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Grammatical alliance and pivot system of Batak Simalungun language: A syntactic typology study. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v17i2.16673

Song, J. J. (2020). Tipologi Linguistik: Morfologi dan sintaksis[Linguistic Typology: Morphology and Syntax] (pp. 1–200).

Sugiyono. (2014). Perspektif metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif[on quantitative and qualitative research methods]. In Metodelogi Penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D (Vol. 3). Alfabeta.

Tarihoran, R. K., & Mulyadi, M. (2022). Grammatical typology and pivot system of Mandailing Language. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(3), 18263–18269.

Turmudi, D. (2020). English scholarly publishing activities in the industrial revolution 4 . 0 : What, Why, and How ? ELTEJ, 3(1), 52–63. http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/eltej/article/view/1890

Umam, M. K. (2021). Google translate in tarjamah learning at Arabic Language Education UIN Walisongo Semarang. Mantiqu Tayr: Journal of Arabic Language, 1(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.25217/mantiqutayr.v1i1.1279

Downloads

Published

2024-02-27