PIVOT SYSTEM IN ARABIC COORDINATION SENTENCE: A SYNTACTIC TYPOLOGY STUDY
(1) Postgraduate Program in Linguistics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
(2) Postgraduate Program in Linguistics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Coordination sentences are those that operate effectively in both written and spoken discourse. The pivot system will discuss the Arabic coordination sentence in this research. This study aimed to highlight the syntactic typology and pivot system of the Arabic coordination sentence. This study used a qualitative approach with descriptive and content analysis methods. This data was analyzed using the Miles and Huberman method. The data were obtained from the form of coordination sentences found in Arabic books and other sources that are considered relevant. The result showed that the Arabic coordinating sentences are formed by four types, namely (1) intransitive-intransitive, (2) intransitive-transitive, (3) transitive-intransitive, and (4) transitive-transitive. Eliminating FN for A and P in Arabic coordinating sentences differs from dropping FN for A and P in English and Arabic coordinating sentences. However, based on the syntactic constructions with indefinite verbs, Arabic grammar is the same as English and Indonesian. The findings of this study contribute insight and treasure to the wealth of science in syntactic typology.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arsyandikayani. (2019). Pergeseran hubungan koordinasi dan subordinasi antarklausa dalam Bahasa Jawa (Pendekatan Tipologi Sintaksis)[Shifting coordination and subordination relations between clauses in Javanese (Syntactic Typology Approach]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Linguistiks Dan Sastra (SEMANTIKS), 1, 114–123.
Artawa, K. & J. (2021). Tipologi linguistik.
Basaria, I. (2013). Tipologi gramatikal dan sistem pivot bahasa Pakpak-Dairi[Grammatical typology and pivot system of Pakpak-Dairi language]. LITERA, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v12i01.1327
Evi, D. A. P. L. (2020). Types and Meaning of Metaphor in Song Lyrics.
Goodall, G. (2017). Coordination in syntax. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.36
Handayani, D., & Ritonga, M. (2022). Sistem pivot Bahasa Mandailing: Kajian tipologi bahasa[Mandailing language pivot system: A typological study of the language]. Kode : Jurnal Bahasa, 11(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.24114/kjb.v11i2.36130
Johanson, L. (2011). The semantics of clause linking: A cross-linguistic typology (review). Language, 87(1), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0014
Karenisa, K.-. (2019). Konjungsi bermakna ‘dan’ dalam bahasa Maanyan [Conjunction means 'and' in Maanyan]. SUAR BETANG, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v13i2.92
Maharani, M. H., Utara, U. S., & Utara, U. S. (2023). Konstruksi kausatif dalam bahasa Melayu Langkat [Causative constructions in Langkat Malay]. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, XIX(1).
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. a, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed., Vol. 28, Issue 4). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/January 11, 2016
Mulyadi. (2016). Kalimat koordinasi bahasa Indonesia: Sebuah ancangan tipologi sintaksis [Sentence Coordination Indonesian: A Draft Syntactic Typology]. Bahasa Dan Sastra Logat, vol.3 No 2(May), 90–98.
Schachter, P. (1986). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Lingua, 69(1–2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(86)90083-5
Shukla, S. (2017). Research design. In Research in Social Science: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Issue September). file:///E:/Documents/dosen/buku Metodologi/[John_W._Creswell]_Research_Design_Qualitative,_Q(Bookos.org).pdf
Sinaga, L. D., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Grammatical alliance and pivot system of Batak Simalungun language: A syntactic typology study. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v17i2.16673
Song, J. J. (2020). Tipologi Linguistik: Morfologi dan sintaksis[Linguistic Typology: Morphology and Syntax] (pp. 1–200).
Sugiyono. (2014). Perspektif metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif[on quantitative and qualitative research methods]. In Metodelogi Penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D (Vol. 3). Alfabeta.
Tarihoran, R. K., & Mulyadi, M. (2022). Grammatical typology and pivot system of Mandailing Language. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(3), 18263–18269.
Turmudi, D. (2020). English scholarly publishing activities in the industrial revolution 4 . 0 : What, Why, and How ? ELTEJ, 3(1), 52–63. http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/eltej/article/view/1890
Umam, M. K. (2021). Google translate in tarjamah learning at Arabic Language Education UIN Walisongo Semarang. Mantiqu Tayr: Journal of Arabic Language, 1(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.25217/mantiqutayr.v1i1.1279
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i1.7929
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
Scientific Publication Unit (UPI)
Gd. HI, Lt1 Kampus 1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 116 A
Kota Metro Lampung 34145 Indonesia
Email : help.upi@ummetro.ac.id
Phone : +62-725-42445
Fax : +62-725-42454
Mobile : +62-8570914-1060
Certificate of Accreditation (Volume 11 No 1, 2022-Volume 15 No 2, 2026
