THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CROSSWORD PUZZLES WITH VARIED CLUES TYPES ON VOCABULARY MASTERY AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN JEMBER

Authors

  • Anisa Intama English Department, Muhammadiyah University of Jember, Indonesia
  • Kristi Nuraini English Department, Muhammadiyah University of Jember, Indonesia
  • Muhlisin Rasuki English Department, Muhammadiyah University of Jember, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v15i2.15863

Keywords:

crossword puzzle, clues, vocabulary learning, EFL

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of crossword puzzles that integrate various type of clues in improving vocabulary mastery among secondary school students in an EFL learning environment. Vocabulary learning in the classroom can be challenging, as students have limited opportunities to interact with English. On the other hand, empirical research focusing on teaching strategies with structured instructional support is also limited. Therefore, this study aims to examine whether using of crossword puzzles that integrate varied clue types can support vocabulary learning. This study employed a pre-experimental one group pretest-posttest design, supported by qualitative data collected through questionnaires. Because the distribution of vocabulary test scores was not normal, non-parametric analysis was performed. Qualitative findings indicate that clues integrated into crossword puzzles support students, including definitions, synonyms, antonyms, fill-in-the-blanks, and pictures with letter clues in each grid, which help students recall the target vocabulary they have learned, in turn increase their confidence during the activity. The results of the study indicate that crossword puzzles with varied clue types improved students’ vocabulary development and engagement in a rural EFL classroom. In practice, the findings suggest that teachers may adapt crossword puzzles with varied clue types as a low-cost accessible strategy to support vocabulary learning in contexts where exposure to English and instructional resources are limited.

References

Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2021). An investigation of the relationship between reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and English language proficiency level of Saudi EFL Learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.2.p.59

Alda, J. N., & Wati, S. (2021). Enhancing learners’ vocabulary acquisition by crossword puzzle game. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature And Language Teaching), 7(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v7i1.2820

Ary, D., Cheser Jacobs, L., K. Sorensen, C., & A. Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to Research in Education Ninth Edition (9th ed.).

Ashar, A., Khartha, A., Abin, R., & Suryadi, R. (2025). Observing student’s engagement in rural Indonesian EFL classrooms through the “word of the day” strategy. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(4), 1324–1335.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i4.17835

Astriyani, A. A., Husna, N., & Hamid, F. (2025). Teaching English in rural areas : Exploring challenges and effective strategies from a teacher’s perspective. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 12(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v12i1.43967

Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553

Eskandari, Z., Khatin-Zadeh, O., Farsani, D., & Banaruee, H. (2024). The effect of type of task on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1306306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1306306

Fadilah, R., Ayudhia, H. Y., Pratama, V. M., & Harmawan, V. (2023). Teachers’ teaching reflection: English teachers’ challenges in rural areas of Indonesia. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 13(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v13i1.8923

Hafizhah, R., & Pratolo, B. W. (2022). The effectiveness of using crossword puzzle games to improve vocabulary mastery of the 7th grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Kalasan. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v1i1.161

Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. A. N. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language : The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1

Luo, Z. (2023). The effectiveness of gamified tools for foreign language learning (FLL): A Systematic Review. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040331

Malik, A., Maulani, F., Farikah, & Winarsih, D. (2024). Micro-teaching and collaborative learning: A strategy for developing student-teacher performance and collaborative skills. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 8(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v8i2.1603

Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2022). Introduction to Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.003

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Word study strategies. In In Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (pp. 263–316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759

Panjaitan, L. M., & Amaniarsih, D. S. (2021). Improving students’ vocabulary mastery by using puzzle game at the second grade of MTS Al-Washliyah Medan. In Journal MELT (Medium For English Language Teaching) (Vol. 5, Number 2). 10.22303/melt.5.2.2020.129-141

Panyajamorn, T., Suanmali, S., & Kohda, Y. (2022). Using MOOC and gamification hybrid learning models in rural public schools in Thailand. In Journal of Educators Onlinel (Vol. 19, Number 3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1363021

Pol, V. de, Janneke, Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher – student interaction : A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

Ramadhani, A. D., & Shofiyuddin, M. (2025). Developing a crossword puzzle as an English learning medium to enhance students’ vocabulary mastery. Indonesian EFL Journal, 11(2), 415–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v11i2.11721

Rasuki, M., & Ahmad, D. F. (2023). Promoting Initial English vocabulary learning through the picture-naming game for young beginning-level EFL Learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 20(4), 986–994. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2023.20.4.18.986

Rejeki, D. S., & Wahyuni, S. (2025). Teamwork makes dream work: Exploring the impact of TGT on EFL Vocabulary Learning. Bookchapter English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation, 1(1), 358–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/eltlt.v1i1.418

Restinawati, R., Dunifa, L., & Una, S. (2024). Teaching and Learninng English vocabulary for beginners in rural and urban schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(2), 20692–20700. https://doi.org/https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/19240

Roseni, E., & Muho, A. (2024). Impact of gamification and interactive language learning platforms on engagement and proficiency in English Language Education. The Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.205.222

Sari, D. F., Yusuf, Y. Q., Wahyuni, S., & Kangka, P. (2023). Improving EFL students’ vocabulary in a rural area through scrabble with crossword picture puzzle. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 7(2), 429–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.7.2.429-439

Sweller, J., Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design : 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Chilf Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Published

2026-06-11