REFINING SCHOLARLY ARGUMENTS: THE ROLE OF TOULMIN’S QUALIFIERS AND REBUTTALS IN MASTER’S STUDENTS’ RESEARCH ARTICLES IN SINTA JOURNALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v15i2.15358Keywords:
Academic Writing, Master Students, Qualifier, Rebuttal, Toulmin’s Argument ModelAbstract
Academic writing requires argumentative patterns to make it strongly appeal to readers. One argumentative pattern frequently used by writers is the Toulmin Argument Pattern. Some basic elements of the Toulmin Argument Pattern, such as Claim, Data, and Warrant, are often found in academic writing and articles, but many also neglect additional elements, such as qualifiers and rebuttals, so that the writing is not balanced. This article analyzes how Toulmin's additional elements, such as qualifications and rebuttals, strengthen the structure of an article, making it more complete, balanced, and complete, and thus more widely accepted by readers. Using a descriptive qualitative design, this study analyzed three articles written by Indonesian master's students in the 4-indexed Sinta Journal, using the Toulmin Argument Pattern (TAP) as a diagnostic framework. The results revealed and demonstrated that 100% of the articles analyzed by master's students successfully integrated qualifications and rebuttals. The use of these elements correlated significantly with higher quality argumentation, indicating greater rhetorical precision and dialectical balance. The study concludes that master's students demonstrate a developed awareness of rhetorical precision, utilizing qualifiers to limit overgeneralization and rebuttals to anticipate counter-arguments. These results suggest that Toulmin’s model is an effective diagnostic tool and should be explicitly integrated into academic writing curricula to bridge the gap between undergraduate and master's student writing proficiency.
References
Alameda, A. R. (2023). An inter-country critical analysis of online studies on the academic writing in English of university students using the Toulmin model. In Peer Reviewed Journal AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal 5(1) 248–259. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0262-973X
Boeriswati, E., Eriyani, R. N., & Wibawani, S. (2024). Needs analysis of expository writing teaching materials based on Toulmin’s argumentation patterns. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 7(4), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v7i4.1071
Donghong Liu, F. W. (2020). What makes proficient writers’ essays more persuasive? A Toulmin perspective. International Journal of TESOL Studies.2(2), 1–13 https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.06.01
Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2020). Counterargumentation at the primary level: An intervention study investigating the argumentative writing of second language learners. System, 89, article 102198 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.
Luna, M., Villalón, R., Mateos, M., & Martín, E. (2020). Improving university argumentative writing through online training. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2020.12.01.08
Magalhães, A. L. (2020). Teaching How to Develop an Argument Using the Toulmin Model. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Educational Research.2(5), 317–322. www.ijmcer.com
Mallahi, O. (2024). Exploring the status of argumentative essay writing strategies and problems of Iranian EFL learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1).1-26 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00241-1
Nadliroh Siregar, R., Syarif, H., & Amri, Z. (2021). An analysis of argument of students’ argumentative essay by using Toulmin model. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-8 2020) 579,106–112 https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210914.019
Nugroho, A., & Stardy, R. (2022). An analysis of Toulmin elements in Indonesian… An analysis of Toulmin elements in Indonesian male and female EFL learners’ argumentative writing. English Language & Literature International Conference Vol. 6 No. 1, 297–308. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/index
Osman, W. H., & Januin, J. (2021). Analysing ESL persuasive essay writing using Toulmin’s model of argument. In Psychology and Education (Vol. 58, Number 1), 1823–1833. www.psychologyandeducation.net
Perdanasari, A., Sudiyanto, & Sangka, K. B. (2021). Development needs analysis of teaching materials for improving critical thinking skills students in Century 21. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1808(1), article 012035 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1
Qin, J., & Liu, Y. (2021). The influence of reading texts on l2 reading-to-write argumentative writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, article 655601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655601
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
Seixas, B. V., Smith, N., & Mitton, C. (2018). The qualitative descriptive approach in international comparative studies: Using online qualitative surveys. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(9), 778–781. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.142
Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. A. (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students' persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.11.006
Sundari, H., & Febriyanti, R. H. (2021). The analysis of Indonesian EFL argumentative writing using Toulmin’s model: the structure and struggles from the learners. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v5i2.8544
Supriyadi, A. (2023). Improving students’ critical thinking by employing Toulmin pattern of argumentation. Education of English as A Foreign Language, 6(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.educafl.2023.006.02.03
Toulmin, S. Edelston. (2003). The Uses of Argument {Updated Ed.}. Cambridge University Press.
Turmudi, D. (2017). Rethinking academic essay writing: selected genres in comparison. Premise: Journal of English Education, 6(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v6i2.1052
Turmudi, D. (2020). Investigating the Indonesian EFL students’ argument in an argumentative essay. Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics.9(2). 200-222 https://fkip.ummetro.ac.id/journal/index.php/english
Utomo, Y. S., Ashadi, & Sarwanto. (2019). Argumentation skills profile on 8th grade students using Toulmin’s argument pattern on controversial topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1) article 012095. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012095
Yang, R. (2022). An empirical study of claims and qualifiers in ESL students’ argumentative writing based on Toulmin model. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00133-w
Yang, R., & Pan, H. (2023). Whole-to-Part argumentation instruction: an action research study aimed at improving Chinese college students’ English argumentative writing based on the Toulmin model. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231207738
Yanu Dharmawan, Y., Verusha Ali, H., & Andika Prasatyo, B. (2023). Comparing the argumentative essay formats of Indonesian and Korean students using the Toulmin model. In Bahasa dan Sastra (Vol. 9, Number 2), 1133–1144. Pendidikan. https://e-journal.my.id/onoma
Zikrillah, A. S., & Ananda, R. P. (2024). An analysis of argument structure in language teaching research article on discussion part published in IJAL journal based on Toulmin argument pattern (TAP). Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal (TELLE) 8(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.22219/telle.v5i1.31422
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics agree to the following terms:
Creative Commons License
Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The premise offers all authors of journal articles their research openly available, free access, and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors permit others to use the content of publications in Premise in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of Premise are required to cite the original source, including the author's name, Premise as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume, number, article page and DOI.
