THE COMPARISSON OF SPEAKING ABILITY USING PAIR DISCUSSION OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING AND REPETITION DRILL OF AUDIO LINGUAL METHOD AT DIFFERENT SELF-CONFIDENCES STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 RUMBIA ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v2i1.1089Keywords:
Pair Discussion, Repetition Drill, Self Confidence, Speaking.Abstract
This undergraduate thesis carries on as experimental study toward speaking ability at different self confidences. Since speaking needs correctness of pronunciation, form of the sentences uses and understandable dialogue. Here the students are expected to be able to speak in English with pronouncing an English word and the form of sentences well also making a better dialogue with their friends. To build the students speaking ability they can learn by practicing and repeating the words and structure of a sentence. The students speaking ability is also influenced by these self confidence.
The purpose of this research is to find out the comparison average scores by applying Pair Discussion and Repetition Drill Technique at different self confidence. By applying the two techniques, students are expected to be able to speak confidently, pronounce the English word and along with the form of the sentences well. in this research, there are two classes of students the eleventh grade of SMA N 1 Rumbia as a sample.
The finding of the result proves from experiment class which taught by Pair Discussion Technique find that students are able to pronounce and to form the sentences well, since this technique focus on discussion in pair as their practice to form the sentences and to pronounce of English words. While in the control class students taught by Repetition Drill Technique find that they are able to pronounce the sentence, since this technique focus on drill and repetition students are able to imitate the pronounce directly. But, by applying both of them, the students who have high and low self confidence have different result of speaking. It means that by applying two methods students can develop their speaking ability although in the different result of speaking ability.
After conducting the research the researcher find that both Pair Discussion and Repetition Drill Technique are good to be applied for students in different self confidence, especially to develop the students’ speaking ability. The researcher expects to the English teachers have to be creative in conducting teaching learning technique so that students can interest in studying.
Â
References
Ahmad, J. (2010). Statistik Lanjutan. Metro: Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro.
AM, Sudirman (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra. Metro: Aksara.
Anggraini, R. (2002). Undergraduate Thesis; A Comparative Study between Male and Female Students’ Ability of English Speaking of The First Year Students of Madrasah Aliyah Hubbulwathan Duri. Surabaya: _____
Arikunto, S. (1996). Prosedur Penelitian: suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
_______ (2002). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Basrowi (2010). Analisis Data Penelitian dengan SPSS. Kediri: Jenggala Pustaka Utama.
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles; An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Second Edition. New York: Longman.
_______ (2004). Language Assesment Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education,Inc.
Celce-Murcia, M. (nd). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language third Edition. Editor.
Damien-Gall, M., Gillet, M. (2001). The Discussion Method in Classroom Teaching. Australia: Nepean College of Advanced Education Kingswood.
Hakim, T. (2002). Mengatasi Rasa Tidak Percaya Diri. Jakarta: Purwa Suara.
Idrus, M. (2008). Hubungan Kepercayaan Diri Remaja Dengan Pola Asuh Orang Tua Etnis Jawa. Yogyakarta.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., Stanne, M.B. (2000). Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.
Lauster, P. (1997). Tes Kepribadian (Terjemahan Cecilia, G.Sumekto). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Preston, D.L. (2007). 365 Steps to Self-Confidence; A Complete Programme for Personal Transformation in Just A Few Minutes A Day, Revised and Updated Third Edition. United Kingdom: How to Books.
Randika, D. (2006). Undergraduate Thesis; The Comparative Study between Discussion and Asking and Answer Method toward Students Speaking ability at the Eleventh Grade of SMA N 1 Bangun Rejoâ€. Lampung: Lampung University .
Sugiyono (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sujanto, A., Lubis, H., Hadi, T. (2009). Psikologi Kepribadian. Surabaya: Bumi Aksara.
Tarigan, H.G. (1981). Berbicara Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Walpole, R.E. (1995). Pengantar Statistika Edisi ke-3. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Widjaja, G. (2002). Complete English Grammar and The Exercise. Jakarta: Buana Ilmu Populer.
Yuliana (2012). Undergradeate Thesis; Comparisson between Using Repetition Drill and Jigsaw Technique Toward Speaking Skill at the First Grade of SMA 1 Purbolinggo East Lampung Academic Year 2011/2012. Metro: Muhammadiyah University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics agree to the following terms:
Creative Commons License
Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The premise offers all authors of journal articles their research openly available, free access, and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors permit others to use the content of publications in Premise in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of Premise are required to cite the original source, including the author's name, Premise as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number, and DOI (if available).
