‘HEY BLOG’ CAN PERSONAL WEBSITE ASSIST L2 STUDENTS’ WILLINGNESS TO DO PEER FEEDBACK?
(1) English Education, UIN Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
(2) English Education, UIN Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Technology's rapid growth has significantly impacted how lecturers incorporate technology into classroom activities, especially when providing feedback. The students will receive feedback during the revision session. There are many techniques for giving feedback on students' writing. For instance, peer and self-feedback are two techniques for checking students' mistakes. Therefore, this research portrays technology as a medium for implementing peer and self-feedback in students' writing. This research aims to describe the integration of media in giving feedback. The media are blogs and Google Docs. This research also gathered students' perceptions of the use of online media. In this research, the researcher implemented qualitative research. This research was conducted by the fourth-semester students of the essay writing class, English Education Study Program, Uin Raden Intan Lampung. The researcher used documentation, an internet survey, and an observation sheet to gather data. The data from the research is analyzed interactively. The findings highlight the significant benefits of utilizing blogs and Google Docs for reflective writing practices. The implication of this research underscores the importance of integrating online media for peer and self-feedback to enhance students' writing skills effectively. This research contributes valuable insight into leveraging technology for academic improvement and fostering a conducive learning environment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aisyah, S., Hartini, N., & Destiana, R. (2022). Google docs as a means of collaborative writing in teacher education. In Acceleration of Digital Innovation & Technology towards Society 5.0 (pp. 289–293). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Darong, H. C. (2024). Unleashing hidden potentials: the effect of self-recording in language assessment. Premise: Journal of English Education, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i1.9020
Donald, Ary, et al. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Ary%2C+D.%2C+Jacobs%2C+L.+C.%2C+Irvine%2C+C.+K.+S.%2C+%26+Walker%2C+D.+%282018%29.+Introduction+to+research+in+education.+Cengage+Learning.&btnG=
Dye, T. (2024). Qualitative data analysis: step-by-step guide (manual vs. automatic) | Thematic. https://getthematic.com/insights/qualitative-data-analysis/
Ge, Z. Gang. (2011). Exploring e-learners' perceptions of net-based peer-reviewed English writing. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11412-010-9103-7
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage.
Hidayat, F. (2020). Exploring students' view of using Google Docs in writing class. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.2.184-194
Ho, P. V. P., Phung, L. T. K., Oanh, T. T. T., & Giao, N. Q. (2020). Should peer e-comments replace traditional peer comments? International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13120a
Huang, H.-Y. C. (2016). Students and the teacher's perceptions on incorporating the blog task and peer feedback into EFL writing classes through blogs. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n11p38
Ion, G., & Stingu, M. (2014). Using feedback through blogs to enhance students' self-reflection and learning. International Scientific Conference, Vol 3 -244–249. https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026X-14-178
Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019). Using google docs for peer-then-teacher review on middle school students' writing. Computers and Composition, 54, 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPCOM.2019.102524
Panadero, E., Lipnevich, A., & Broadbent, J. (2019). Turning self-assessment into self-feedback. In The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education (pp. 147–163). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_9
Pham, H. T. P. (2022a). Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: Student feedback and revision in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35((9)), 2112–2147.
Pham, H. T. P. (2022b). Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: student feedback and revision in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2112–2147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530
Pham, V., Luong, T., Pham, T. T. T. O.-, VPH, undefined, Luong, undefined, & 2022, undefined. (2020). Should peer E-comments replace traditional peer comments? Papers.Ssrn.Com
VPH Pham, TK Luong, T Thi Thuy Oanh, N Quang GiaoPham, VPH, Luong, TKP, Tran, TTO, Nguyen, QG (2020). Should Peer E, 2022•papers.Ssrn.Com, 13(1), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13120a
Rahayu, E. S. (2016). Using google docs on collaborative writing technique for teaching English to non-English department students. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 4(1), 226–236.
Saleh, N. W. I., Alhodairy, Y. H., & Mare, Z. A. (2021). Using google docs to Enhance Collaborative Writing and Peer Feedback Practice of Libyan EFL Learners. Translation Studies, 9(04).
Semeraro, J., & Moore, N. S. (2016). The use of google docs technology to support peer revision. Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation, 7, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-045820160000007013/FULL/XML
Shanks, R. (2022). Using blog posts for peer to peer learning and summative assessment. https://www.tumblr.com/
Sudarmaji, I., & Lifanie, M. B. (2020). A comparison study: teacher, peer, and self-feedback on students essay writing. JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 6.(2), 168–180.
Turmudi, D. (2020). English Scholarly Publishing Activities in the Industrial Revolution 4.0: What, Why, and How? English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i1.1890
Yu, S. (2019). Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from Master's students in the Macau EFL context. Assessing Writing, 40, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASW.2019.03.004
Zhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014a). The effects of blog-mediated peer feedback on learners' motivation, collaboration, and course satisfaction in a second language writing course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.860
Zhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014b). The effects of blog-mediated peer feedback on learners' motivation, collaboration, and course satisfaction in a second language writing course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.860
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i2.9154
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
Scientific Publication Unit (UPI)
Gd. HI, Lt1 Kampus 1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 116 A
Kota Metro Lampung 34145 Indonesia
Email : help.upi@ummetro.ac.id
Phone : +62-725-42445
Fax : +62-725-42454
Mobile : +62-8570914-1060
Certificate of Accreditation (Volume 11 No 1, 2022-Volume 15 No 2, 2026
