Evaluation of "How To Be A Good Mentoring Training†Effectiveness for Peer Mentor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/gdn.v10i1.2623Kata Kunci:
peer mentoring, people development, training evaluationAbstrak
"Kakak Pendamping, Support Class Program" is a term for peer mentor of Faculty Psychology WM University program. The mentor needs to be equipped with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of becoming good mentors through training programs called "How To Be a Good Mentor" training. But, this program hasn’t evaluated whether the training is effective or not. If a training program is not assessed, it will cause several losses for both mentors and the organization. This study aims to identify the effectiveness of the training "How To Be a Good Mentor.†The method used is mix-method and involves all stakeholders in the UKWMS Psychology Faculty, namely staff, students, and Mentors. The results of the study found that "How To Be a Good Mentor" training has not been effective because it does not go through the ideal design stage of training. Without any needs analysis program, and the absence of a training evaluation program, as an action plan due to ineffectiveness of the training that has been held. A training module will be redesigned to develop a training module, "Creating a Full Heart Mentor." This training aims to improve the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of the Mentors. Evaluation of the "Creating a Full Heart Mentor" training is useful in evaluating the results of assessments showing the satisfaction of Mentor to the training process, and improving learning after obtaining training materials. The training on "Creating a Full Heart Mentor" produces needs analysis data used as a further development program for Mentors.
Â
"Kakak Pendamping Support Class Program" adalah sebutan untuk peer mentor program Fakultas Psikologi WM University. Sebagai upaya untuk mengoptimalkan program ini, para mentor perlu dibekali dengan pengetahuan, keterampilan, dan sikap bagaimana menjadi mentor yang baik melalui program pelatihan yang dinamakan pelatihan “How To Be a Good Mentorâ€. Namun program ini belum dievaluasi apakah pelatihan tersebut efektif atau tidak. Jika program pelatihan tidak dievaluasi, maka akan menimbulkan sejumlah kerugian baik bagi mentor maupun organisasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas pelatihan "How To Be a Good Mentor". Metode yang digunakan adalah mix-method dan melibatkan seluruh stakeholder di Fakultas Psikologi UKWMS yaitu staf, mahasiswa, dan Mentor. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa pelatihan "How To Be a Good Mentor" belum efektif karena tidak melalui tahap desain pelatihan yang ideal, tanpa adanya program analisis kebutuhan, dan tidak adanya program evaluasi pelatihan. Sebagai sebuah action plan akibat tidak efektifnya pelatihan yang telah dilaksanakan, maka modul pelatihan akan didesain ulang dan menghasilkan pengembangan modul pelatihan “Menciptakan Mentor Sepenuh Hatiâ€. Pelatihan ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan, keterampilan, dan sikap para Mentor. Evaluasi pelatihan “Menciptakan Mentor Sepenuh Hati†efektif ditinjau dari hasil evaluasi yang menunjukkan kepuasan pendamping terhadap proses pelatihan, dan peningkatan pembelajaran setelah mendapatkan materi pelatihan. Pelatihan “Membuat Mentor Sepenuh Hati†menghasilkan data analisis kebutuhan yang nantinya akan digunakan sebagai program pengembangan lebih lanjut bagi Mentor.
Referensi
Agunloye, O.O. (2013). Impact on mentoring program on faculty performance in institutions of higher education: A developing country study. Management, Knowledge, and Learning International Conference 2013, 957-964. Downloaded from http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-02-4/papers/ML13-343.pdf
AlYahya, M, S., Mat, N, B. (2013). Evaluation of effectiveness of training and development: The kirkpatrick model. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2, 11, 14-24. Downloaded from http://www.ajbms.org/articlepdf/2ajbms20132112743.pdf
Anucha, U., Regehr, C. and Daciuk, J. (2001). Evaluation of the Volunteer Connections Programme, Toronto: Centre for Applied Social Research, University of Toronto
Bartle, E. (2015). Experiential learning: an overview. Discussion paper prepared for Professor Joanne Wright, Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) The University of Queensland Australia. Downloaded from https://itali.uq.edu.au/filething/get/1860/Experiential_learning_overview_Final_16_Mar_15.pdf
Blanchard, P. N & Thacker, J. W. (2007). Effective training systems, strategies, and practises. New Jersey: Pearsin Prentice Hall
Bruce, M. & Bridgeland, J. (2014). The mentoring effect: Young people’s persepectives on the outcomes and availability of mentoring. Civic entrprises with Hart Research Associates for MENTOR: The National Partnership. Downloaded from http://www.mentoring.org/images/uploads/Report_TheMentoringEffect.pdf
Bonin, E. (2013). Effect of peer mentors on academic performance. InSight: Rivier Academic Journal. Vol. 9, 2. Downloaded from https://www.rivier.edu/journal/ROAJ-Fall-2013/J821-Bonin_DCLL.pdf
Ehrich, L. S., Hansford, B. & Tennent, L. (2004). Formal mentoring programmes in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 518-540
Eseryel, D. (2002). Approaches to evaluation of training: Theory & practise. Educational Technology & Society, 5, 2, 93-98. Downloaded from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.194.6630&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Fountain, J & Newcomer, K, E. (2016). Developing and sustaining effective faculty mentoring programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 22, 4, 483-506. Downloaded from http://www.naspaa.org/JPAEMessenger/Article/vol22-4/05_Fountain%20Newcomer%2020160916.pdf
Garvey, B. & Alred, G. (2000). Educating mentors. Mentoring & Tutoring, 8, 113-126
Gopal. (2009). Effectiveness of executives training programs. The Indian Journal of Commerce, 61 (3), 86-90
Nagar, V. (2009). Measuring training effectiveness. The Indian Journal of
Commerce, 62 (4), 86-90
Hall, R. & Jaugietis, Z. (2011). Developing peer mentoring through evaluation. Innov High Educ, 36, 41-52. Downloaded from http://reforma.fen.uchile.cl/Papers/Developing%20Peer%20Mentoring%20through%20Evaluation%20-%20Hall,%20Jaugietis.pdf
Kirkpatrick, D, dan Kirkpatrick, J. (2008). Implementing The Four Levels: A Practical Guide for Effective of TrainingPrograms. San Fransisco. Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc
Larose, S, dkk. (2012). Impact of a college student academic mentoring program on perceived parental and teacher educational involvement. Journal of Applied Social Pscyhology. Downloaded from http://www2.cegep-ste-foy.qc.ca/freesite/fileadmin/groups/213/_temp_/MIRES-Impactinvolvparteach.pdf
Leidenfrost, B., Strassnig, B., Schultz, M., Carbon C.C., & Schabman, A. (2014). The impact of peer mentoring on mentee academic performance: is any mentoring sytile better than no mentoring at all?. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 26, 1, 102-111. Downloaded from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1043041.pdf
Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and the undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61, 4, 505-532
Johnson, W. B. (2002). The intentional mentor: Strategies and guidelines for the practice of mentoring. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 88-96
Kee, J. E., & Newcomer, K. E. (2008). Transforming public and nonprofit organizations: Stewardship for leading change Vienna, VA: Management Concepts.
McEvoy, G. M., & Buller, P. F. (1990). Five uneasy pieces in the training evaluation puzzle. Training and Development Journal, 44, 8, 39-42.
Mee, L. L. & Bush, T. (2003). Student mentoring in higher education: Hong Kong Baptist University. Mentoring & Tutoring, 11, 263-271
Million, S. K. (1988). Training mentors and protégés: The key to successful mentoring programmes. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Council of States on Inservice Education, New Orleans, LA.
Noe, A. (2010). Employee training and development. Singapore: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc
Pagan, R. & Edwards-Wilson, R. (2002). A mentoring programme for remedial students. Journal of College Student Retention, 4, 207-226
Rehmat, W., Alatio, I., Agha, M., Khan, H, R. (2015). Is training effective? Evaluating training effectiveness in call centers. Electronic journal of business ethics and organization studies. 2, 1, 4-13. Downloaded from http://ejbo.jyu.fi/pdf/ejbo_vol20_no1_pages_4-13.pdf
Rodger, S. & Tremblay, P. (2003). The effects of a peer mentoring program on academic success among first year university students. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 33, 3, 1-18
Salas, Eduardo, and Bowers, J, A, C. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual review of psychology 52, 1, 471-499
Sevilla, Consuelo G. et. al (2007). Research Methods. Rex Printing Company. Quezon City
Snowden, M & Hardy, T. (2012). Peer mentorship and positive effects on student mentor and mentee retention and academic success. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning. 14, 76-92. Downloaded from http://info.wartburg.edu/Portals/0/Pathways/Mentoring/Peer%20Mentorship%20and%20Positive%20Effects%20on%20Retention%20and%20Academic%20Success.pdf
Sugiyono. (2005). Metode penelitian adminstrasi. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta
Tahir, N, Yousafzai, I. K., Jan, S., Hashim, M. (2014).The impact of training and development on employees performance and productivity: A case study of united bank limited peshawar city, KPK, Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 4, 86-98.
Tierney, J. P. & Branch, A. Y. (1992) College Students as Mentors for At-risk Youth: A Study of Six Campus Partners in Learning Programmes, Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures
Tindall, J. A. (1995) Peer Programmes: An In-Depth Look at Peer Helping – Planning, Implementation, and Administration, Bristol, PA: Accelerated Development
Terrion, J. & Philion, R. (2008). The electronic journal as reflection-on-action: a qualitative analysis of communication and learning in a peer-mentoring program. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 5, 583- 597
Terrion, J.L., Phillion., R., & Leonard., D. (2007). An evaluation of a university peer-mentoring training programme. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring. 5, 1, 42-57. Downloaded from http://ijebcm.brookes.ac.uk/documents/vol05issue1-paper-01.pdf
Tinto, V. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 167-177
Topno, H. (2012). Evaluation of training and development: An analysis of various models. Journal of Business and Management, 5 (2), 16-22
Usmara, A. (2003). Praktis manajemen SDM: Unggul melalui orientasi dan pelatihan karyawan. Yogyakarta: Santusta
Whitney, S., Hendricker, E., & Offutt, C. (2011). Moderating factors of natural mentoring relationships, problem behaviors, and emotional well-being. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19, 1, 83-105
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling agree to the following terms:

GUIDENA: Journal Of Guidance And Counseling, Psychology, And Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. GUIDENA offers all authors of journal articles allows their research openly available, free access and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in GUIDENA in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of GUIDENA are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, GUIDENA as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).