DEEP SCAFFOLDING BASED ON RME TO REDUCE SLOW LEARNERS’ ERRORS IN NUMERACY PROBLEM SOLVING

Penulis

  • Kadek Adi Wibawa Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar
  • I Made Dharma Atmaja Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar
  • I Gde Dhika Widarnandana Universitas Dhyana Pura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v15i2.14862

Kata Kunci:

deep scaffolding, inclusion, numeracy, realistic mathematics education, slow learners.

Abstrak

Slow learners often struggle with understanding problem contexts, constructing representations, and applying appropriate strategies due to limitations in working memory, processing speed, and conceptual generalization. Therefore, structured, gradual, meaningful and enjoyable assistance is needed which is linked to the experiences and lives around slow learners students, which is called deep scaffolding based on Realistic Mathematics Education (RME). This study aims to explore the implementation of Deep Scaffolding based on RME to reduce thinking errors among slow learner students in numeracy problem solving. An interpretative qualitative method with an exploratory single-case study design was employed to gain an in-depth understanding of the cognitive and affective learning processes of one selected slow learner student. Data were collected through contextual numeracy worksheets, direct observation, and semi-structured interviews guided by the mindful–meaningful–joyful scaffolding framework. The findings reveal that deep scaffolding based on RME effectively improved the student’s ability to interpret contexts, build accurate visual representations, apply basic arithmetic strategies, and evaluate multiple solution alternatives. SL1 demonstrated significant growth in conceptual understanding and problem-solving flexibility, alongside increased confidence, motivation, and positive emotional engagement. These results indicate that deep scaffolding integrated with RME provides meaningful cognitive and affective support for slow learners in numeracy learning. This study recommends that teachers in inclusive classrooms apply structured deep scaffolding and contextual task to enhance comprehension and problem-solving accuracy among slow learners.

Biografi Penulis

Kadek Adi Wibawa, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Mathematics Education Study Program

I Made Dharma Atmaja, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Mathematics Education Study Program

I Gde Dhika Widarnandana, Universitas Dhyana Pura

Psychology Study Program

Referensi

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. In Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Association. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Shurr, J., Bassette, L., & Whorley, A. (2018). Using the Virtual–Representational–Abstract Approach to Support Students With Intellectual Disability in Mathematics. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618755696

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cheong, J. M. Y., Walker, Z. M., & Rosenblatt, K. (2017). Numeracy Abilities of Children in Grades 4 to 6 with Mild Intellectual Disability in Singapore. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 64(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2016.1188891

Chua, V. C. (2021). Improving learners’ productive disposition through realistic mathematics education, a teacher’s critical reflection of personal pedagogy. Reflective Practice, 22(6), 809–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.1974373

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2025). Systematic review of learning trajectories in early mathematics. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 57(4), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01644-1

Das, K. (2020). Realistic Mathematics & Vygotsky’s Theories in Mathematics Education. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i1.3346

Esparcia, R. D., Piñero, B. A., Chona, M., & Futalan, Z. (2024). Learners’ Scaffolding Techniques: Their Advantages in Learning Mathematics. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0144

Geiger, V., & Schmid, M. (2024). A critical turn in numeracy education and practice. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1363566

Hord, C. (2023). Middle and high school math teaching for students with mild intellectual disability. Support for Learning, 38(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12425

Listiawati, N., Sabon, S. S., Siswantari, Subijanto, Wibowo, S., Zulkardi, & Riyanto, B. (2023). Analysis of implementing Realistic Mathematics Education principles to enhance mathematics competence of slow learner students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp683-700

Long, H., Bouck, E., & Domka, A. (2021). Manipulating Algebra: Comparing Concrete and Virtual Algebra Tiles for Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Exceptionality, 29(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1850454

Malik, R., Abdi, D., Wang, R., & Demszky, D. (2025). Scaffolding middle school mathematics curricula with large language models. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(3), 999–1027. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13571

Nurmasari, L., Budiyono, Nurkamto, J., & Ramli, M. (2024). Realistic Mathematics Engineering for improving elementary school students’ mathematical literacy. In Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp1-26

OECD. (2020). Education at a Glance 2020. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en

Reinhold, F., Hoch, S., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. (2020). Learning fractions with and without educational technology: What matters for high-achieving and low-achieving students? Learning and Instruction, 65, 101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101264

Sellars, M. (2017). Numeracy in authentic contexts: Making meaning across the curriculum. In Numeracy in Authentic Contexts: Making Meaning Across the Curriculum. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5736-6

Sobkow, A., Olszewska, A., & Traczyk, J. (2020). Multiple numeric competencies predict decision outcomes beyond fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection. Intelligence, 80, 101452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101452

Tong, D. H., Nguyen, T. T., Uyen, B. P., Ngan, L. K., Khanh, L. T., & Tinh, P. T. (2022). Realistic Mathematics Education’s Effect on Students’ Performance and Attitudes: A Case of Ellipse Topics Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.403

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 713–717). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170

Yilmaz, R. (2020). Prospective mathematics teachers’ cognitive competencies on realistic mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.8690.17-44

Yustitia, V., Kusmaharti, D., & Wardani, I. S. (2025). Students’ critical thinking in numeracy problem-solving through moderate self-Efficacy: A mixed-methods study. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025410

Diterbitkan

2026-07-24

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles