PENGEMBANGAN MODUL AJAR INTEGRAL TAK TENTU DENGAN MODEL KOOPERATIF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v14i2.11097Kata Kunci:
Integral, Keefektifan, Kepraktisan, kooperatif, Modul, PengembanganAbstrak
Hasil belajar siswa pada materi integral tak tentu masih rendah. Rendahnya hasil belajar siswa karena tidak ada modul ajar yang digunakan untuk belajar mandiri. Modul ajar harus diintegrasikan dengan model belajar, salah satunya model kooperatif karena model kooperatif dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi matematika yang dianggap sulit oleh siswa. Sehingga tujuan penelitian untuk menghasilkan modul ajar integral tak tentu yang valid, praktis dan Efektif meningkatkan hasil belajar. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan adalah research and development (R&D) dengan model pengembangan ADDIE. Subjek penelitian melibatkan 35 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa angket yang disusun berdasarkan Skala Likert. Adapun instrument pengumpulan data yang digunakan meliputi angket validasi ahli materi, ahli pembelajaran dan guru matematika. Teknik analisis data dengan statistik deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan valid dari segi materi, model pembelajaran dan guru dengan skor nilai 92.11%, 92,22% dan 90,22. Ditemukan juga pembanding hasil belajar antara siswa yang menggunakan modul ajar integral dengan yang tidak menggunakan modul ajar Integral yaitu nilai mean 67 dan 87,68. Sedangkan penilaian siswa terhadap semua aspek dalam modul ini dinilai siswa dengan skor 92,01%. Kesimpulan, pengembangan modul ajar integral tak tentu berbasis model kooperatif praktis dan efektif membantu siswa memahami materi integral dalam memperoleh hasil belajarReferensi
Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Ross, N., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2022). Opening up the black box: Teacher competence, instructional quality, and students’ learning progress. Learning and Instruction, 79(March), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101600
Gonzálezâ€pérez, L. I., & RamÃrezâ€montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
Hamadi, M., El-Den, J., Azam, S., & Sriratanaviriyakul, N. (2022). Integrating social media as cooperative learning tool in higher education classrooms: An empirical study. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34(6), 3722–3731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.12.007
Hidayat, R., Mohd Saad, M. R., & Wewe, M. (2025). A meta-analysis of the effect of metacognitive instruction on mathematics achievement. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2517510
Iraola, E. A., & Romero, G. R. (2024). Dialogue among educators: Rethinking and recreating scenarios of cooperative and inclusive learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100322
Kholid, M. N., Hendriyanto, A., Sahara, S., Muhaimin, L. H., Juandi, D., Sujadi, I., Kuncoro, K. S., & Adnan, M. (2023). A systematic literature review of Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in mathematics education: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Cogent Education, 10(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2269047
Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., Xu, S., Song, Y., Chen, G., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2025). Recommendations Based on Experiences of Pandemic-Led Remote Mathematics Teaching in Pre-K–12 Contexts: A Systematic Review From the Activity Theory Perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(3), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70005
Lumbantoruan, J. H., & Ditasona, C. (2024). Development of a mathematics module on circle material based on the small group discussion model. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.20920
Lumbantoruan, J. H., & Manalu, R. U. (2024). Effectiveness of learning mathematics derivative materials using modules equipped with cooperative models in high schools. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(1), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25354
Miao, Z., Bokhove, C., & Reynolds, D. (2023). Master Mathematics Teachers. In Master Mathematics Teachers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127925
Mustafa, F., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Gao, X. (Andy). (2024). The challenges and solutions of technology integration in rural schools: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 126(May), 102380.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102380
Panzer, M., Bender, B., & Gronau, N. (2024). A deep reinforcement learning based hyper-heuristic for modular production control. International Journal of Production Research, 62(8), 2747–2768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2233641
Rizki, S., & Linuhung, N. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Program Linear Berbasis Kontekstual Dan Ict. AKSIOMA Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v5i2.674
Setiamurti, A., & Kurniawati, F. (2024). Fostering Creativity in Higher Education Institution: A Systematic Review (2018-2022). Open Education Studies, 6(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0221
Siagian, Q. A., Darhim, D., & Juandi, D. (2023). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Models on The Students’ Mathematical Critical and Creative Thinking Ability: Meta-Analysis Study. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 969–990. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.2281
Stankov, P. (2024). The death of exams? Grade inflation and student satisfaction when coursework replaces exams. International Review of Economics Education, 46(4), 100289.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2024.100289
Sugiyono, S., Lastariwati, B., Budiastuti, E., & Yudianto, A. (2018). Development of Authentic Assessment Instruments for Saintifical Learning in Tourism Vocational High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 24(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v24i1.16670
Ulya, H. (2024). The Meta-Analysis of Innovative Mathematics Learning Toward the Mathematics Ability in Various Countries. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 4899–4914. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5854
Wakid, M., Sofyan, H., Widowati, A., & Zaida Ilma, A. (2024). Learning-oriented assessment: a systematic literature network analysis. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2366075
Zareef, M., & Jabeen, M. (2025). Systematic literature review of digital curation services in academic libraries (2001–2023): A global perspective. Journal of Information Science, 23(February), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241305348
Zhou, T., Cañabate, D., Bubnys, R., Staniküniené, B., & Colomer, J. (2025). Collaborative learning, cooperative learning and reflective learning to foster sustainable development: A scoping review. Review of Education, 13(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70065
Zhumabay, N., Yelemessova, Z., Balta, N., Abylkassymova, A., Bakytkazy, T., & Marynowski, R. (2024). Designing effective STEM courses: a mixed-methods study of the impact of a STEM education course on teachers’ self-efficacy and course experiences. Frontiers in Education, 9(March), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1276828
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
Creative Commons License
AKSIOMA:Â Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. AKSIOMA offers all authors of journal articles allows their research openly available, free access and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in AKSIOMA in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of AKSIOMA are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, AKSIOMA as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
