METACOGNITIVE ACTIVITIES IN GROUP DISCUSSIONS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS MATHEMATICS MULTIPLICATION MATERIAL

Dyah Triwahyuningtyas(1), Cholis Sadijah(2*), Makbul Muksar(3), Subanji Subanji(4),

(1) Universitas Negeri Malang/Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang
(2) Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Universitas Negeri Malang
(4) Universitas Negeri Malang
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Student metacognition only focuses on individuals, not yet associated with student positioning in the group. There are positioning groups whose roles change, so it is necessary to examine more deeply the characterization of students' metacognition in solving multiplication problems in group discussions in terms of student positioning. This study aims to describe students' metacognitive activities, students' roles during the discussion process, and students' metacognitive abilities related to students' roles during group discussions on multiplication material in mathematics of grade 6 students in one of the public elementary schools in Indonesia. Not only knowing the concept so that students can think critically and learn independently from students without teacher assistance, but also students must be trained in solving problems. This study used descriptive qualitative as the research method. It was found that awareness was mainly found in expert and facilitator positions, regulation was found in expert and facilitator students, and evaluation was found in all student roles. The metacognitive characteristics that emerged in group discussions were expert students as triggers (stimulus) and regulators (contribution), facilitator students as regulators (contribution) and followers (passive), and novice students as followers (passive).

Metakognitif siswa hanya berfokus terhadap individu, belum dikaitkan dengan pemosisian siswa dalam kelompok. Ada kelompok pemosisian yang perannya berubah, sehingga perlu mengkaji lebih mendalam terkait karakterisasi metakognitif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah perkalian pada diskusi kelompok ditinjau dari pemosisian siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan aktivitas metakognitif siswa, peran siswa selama proses diskusi, dan kemampuan metakognitif siswa yang terkait dengan peran siswa selama diskusi kelompok pada materi perkalian matematika siswa kelas 6 di salah satu sekolah dasar negeri di Indonesia. Tidak hanya mengetahui konsep agar siswa dapat berpikir kritis dan belajar secara mandiri dari siswa tanpa bantuan guru, tetapi juga siswa harus dilatih dalam memecahkan masalah. Penelitian ini menggunakan deskriptif kualitatif sebagai metode penelitian. Ditemukan bahwa kesadaran terutama ditemukan pada posisi ahli dan fasilitator, regulasi ditemukan pada siswa ahli dan fasilitator, dan evaluasi ditemukan pada semua peran siswa. Karakteristik metakognitif yang muncul dalam diskusi kelompok adalah siswa ahli sebagai pemicu (stimulus) dan pengatur (kontribusi), siswa fasilitator sebagai pengatur (kontribusi) dan pengikut (pasif), dan siswa pemula sebagai pengikut (pasif).


Keywords


Group Discussion; Metacognitive; Multiplication

Full Text:

PDF

References


AL-Baddareen, G., Ghaith, S., & Akour, M. (2015). Self-Efficacy, Achievement Goals, and Metacognition as Predicators of Academic Motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2068–2073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.345

Álvarez-Bueno, C. (2017). The Effect of Physical Activity Interventions on Children’s Cognition and Metacognition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. In Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Vol. 56, Issue 9, pp. 729–738). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.06.012

Aminah, M., Kusumah, Y. S., Suryadi, D., & Sumarmo, U. (2018). The effect of metacognitive teaching and mathematical prior knowledge on mathematical logical thinking ability and self-regulated learning. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1134a

Amir, M. F., & Kusuma W, M. D. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 2(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bpqas

Arifin, S., Setyosari, P., Sa’dijah, C., & Kuswandi, D. (2019). Increasing Critical Thinking and Student Retention: A Learning Model Approach. International Journal of Research & Review, 6(10), 168–175. www.ijrrjournal.com

Artuso, C. (2019). Short-term training on working memory updating and metacognition in primary school: The effect on reading comprehension. School Psychology International, 40(6), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034319881671

Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Bang, D., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., Frith, C., Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., & Bang, D. (2012). What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition. April. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0420

Bakracevic Vukman, K., & Licardo, M. (2010). How cognitive, metacognitive, motivational and emotional self-regulation influence school performance in adolescence and early adulthood. Educational Studies, 36(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690903180376

Barenberg, J., & Dutke, S. (2019). Testing and metacognition: retrieval practise effects on metacognitive monitoring in learning from text. Memory, 27(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1506481

Baten, E., Praet, M., & Desoete, A. (2017). The relevance and efficacy of metacognition for instructional design in the domain of mathematics. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(4), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0851-y

Branigan, H. E., & Donaldson, D. I. (2020). Teachers Matter for Metacognition: Facilitating Metacognition in the Primary School Through Teacher-Pupil Interactions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(August), 100718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100718

Brown, R. G. (2015). Metacognitions, anxiety, and distress related to motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(2), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.021

Budiono, H., & Abdurrohim, M. (2020). Peran Guru dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Komunikasi (Communication) Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Negeri Teratai. Jurnal IKA PGSD (Ikatan Alumni PGSD) UNARS, 8(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.36841/pgsdunars.v8i1.589

DeJarnette, A. F., & González, G. (2015). Positioning during group work on a novel task in Algebra II. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(4), 378–422. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.4.0378

Destan, N., Hembacher, E., Ghetti, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2014). Early metacognitive abilities: The interplay of monitoring and control processes in 5- to 7-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.04.001

Dewi, N. (2019). Cognition, conscience, and creativity: Multimedia-based literature teaching for pre-service teachers in Indonesia. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(2), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2502-07

Dindar, M., Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2020). Interplay of metacognitive experiences and performance in collaborative problem solving. Computers and Education, 154(September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103922

Dirgantoro, K. P. S. (2018). Pendekatan Keterampilan Metakognitif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 1–10.

Faradiba, S. S., Sadijah, C., Parta, I. N., & Rahardjo, S. (2019). Metacognitive therapy for mathematics disorder. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042079

Hastuti, I. D., Nusantara, T., & Susanto, H. (2016). Constructive Metacognitive Activity Shift in Mathematical Problem Solving. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(8), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2731

Inggriyani, F., & Fazriyah, N. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Menulis Narasi di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 30–41.

Jagals, D., & Van Der Walt, M. (2016). Enabling metacognitive skills for mathematics problem solving: A collective case study of metacognitive reflection and awareness. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2016.1192239

Lei, W., Chen, J., Yang, C., Guo, Y., Feng, P., Feng, T., & Li, H. (2020). Metacognition-related regions modulate the reactivity effect of confidence ratings on perceptual decision-making. Neuropsychologia, 144(May), 107502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107502

Magiera, M. T., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2011). Characterizations of social-based and self-based contexts associated with students’awareness, evaluation,and regulation of their thinking during small-group mathematical modeling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(5), 486–520. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.5.0486

Mills, R., Bourke, T., & Siostrom, E. (2020). Complexity and contradiction: Disciplinary expert teachers in primary science and mathematics education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89(xxxx), 103010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103010

Polya, G. (1973). How To Solve It. In Doubleday Anchor Book Doubleday & Company, Inc Garden City, New York. https://doi.org/10.2307/3609122

Raymond, K. M. (2019). First-year secondary mathematics teachers’ metacognitive knowledge of communication activities. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1425590

Rismawati, M. & Asnayani, M. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Konsep Siswa Kelas IV dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Ulangan Matematika dengan Metode Newman J-PiMat. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 69–78.

Roebers, C. (2017). Executive function and metacognition: Towards a unifying framework of cognitive self-regulation. In Developmental Review (Vol. 45, pp. 31–51). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.04.001

Roebers, C. M. dkk. (2012). Executive functioning, metacognition, and self-perceived competence in elementary school children: An explorative study on their interrelations and their role for school achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 7(3), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9089-9

Rukminingrum, D. V., Hanurawan, F., & Mudiono, A. (2017). Pengetahuan Metakognitif Belajar Siswa Kelas V SD. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(2), 280–284. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/8547

Sa’Dijah, C., Afriyani, D., Subanji, Muksar, M., & Anwar, L. (2018). Assessing students’ pseudo-mathematical translation using translation-verification model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014(September), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054548

Sa’dijah, C., Kholid, M. N., Hidayanto, E., & Permadi, H. (2020). REFLECTIVE THINKING CHARACTERISTICS: A STUDY IN THE PROFICIENT MATHEMATICS PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p159-172

Sa’dijah, C., Purnomo, H., Abdullah, A. H., Permadi, H., Anwar, L., Cahyowati, E. T. D., & Sa’diyah, M. (2023). Students’ Numeracy Skills in Solving Numeracy Tasks: Analysis of Students of Junior High Schools. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113664

Sa’dijah, C., Sa’diyah, M., Sisworo, & Anwar, L. (2020). Students’ mathematical dispositions towards solving HOTS problems based on FI and FD cognitive style. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215(April). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000644

Sa’Diyah, M., Sa’Dijah, C., Sisworo, & Handayani, U. F. (2019). How Students Build Their Mathematical Dispositions towards Solving Contextual and Abstract Mathematics Problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012090

Sasongko, Dimas Fery; Subanji; Sulandra, I. M. (2017). Metakognisi Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Trigonometri. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(April), 52–63.

Siagian, M. D. (2016). Kemampuan koneksi matematik dalam pembelajaran matematika. MES: Journal of Matematics Education and Science2, 2(1), 58–67.

Smith, J. (2014). Animal metacognition: A tale of two comparative psychologies. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033105

Smith, J. M., & Mancy, R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive and collaborative talk during group mathematical problem-solving–what do we mean by collaborative metacognition? Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2017.1410215

Sumitro, N. K., Sa’dijah, C., Raharjo, S., & Rahardi, R. (2019). The emergence of metacognitive activities through the scaffolding interaction. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(1C2), 665–671.

Tarrant, P., & Holt, D. (2016). Metacognition in the Primary Classroom. In Metacognition in the Primary Classroom. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731636

Tian, Y., Fang, Y., & Li, J. (2018). The effect of metacognitive knowledge on mathematics performance in self-regulated learning framework-multiple mediation of self-efficacy and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02518

Udil, P. A., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Riyadi, R. (2017). Metacognition Process of Students with High Mathematics Anxiety in Mathematics Problem-Solving. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 261. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16724

Verdianingsih, E. (2017). Self-Esteem dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. EDUSCOPE, 3(2), 7–15.

Williams, A. T., & Svensson, M. (2020). Student Teachers’ Collaborative Learning of Science in Small-Group Discussions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788141

Yilmaz, A. (2011). The temporal precedence of metacognition in the development of anxiety and depression symptoms in the context of life-stress: A prospective study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(3), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.11.001

Yuwono, C. S. M. (2014). Peningkatan Keterampilan Metakognisi Siswa dengan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Jigsaw-Modifikasi. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan, 4(1), 1–21.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v13i1.9691

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.