ENTREPRENEUR MATHEMATICS (ENTREMATH): TEACHING MATERIALS IN IMPROVING PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS
(1) SMAN 1 Luragung Kabupaten Kuningan
(2) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
(3) Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Mathematics in SMK is a general subject that must be understood, in fact many students avoid mathematics, one of the reasons is because the teaching materials have not facilitated the characteristics of students. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity, application, and effectiveness of digital entrepreneurship-based mathematics modules in improving students' problem-solving abilities. With students from class XI vocational courses, this research applies the ADDIE paradigm. Data were obtained using Entremath validation questionnaires, student and teacher response questionnaires, and post-test scores. The results show that mathematics is entrepreneur-based. Entremath is considered to fall under the very valid criteria. It is declared practical, with 86.9% of students and 96% of teachers belonging to the very practical category, and effectively denoted by a sig value greater than table t. The results of entrepreneurial mathematics research contain qualities that can be used for mathematics education
Matematika di SMK merupakan mata pelajaran umum yang harus dipahami, nyatanya banyak siswa yang menghindari matematika, salah satu penyebabnya adalah karena bahan ajar yang belum memfasilitasi karakteristik siswa. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi validitas, penerapan, dan efektivitas modul digital matematika berbasis kewirausahaan dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa. Dengan peserta didik kelas XI program studi SMK, penelitian ini menerapkan paradigma ADDIE. Data diperoleh dengan menggunakan angket validasi Entremath, angket respon siswa dan guru, serta nilai post-test. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa modul digital matematika berbasis wirausaha dianggap masuk dalam kriteria yang sangat valid. Dinyatakan praktis, dengan respon positif 86,9% dari siswa dan 96% dari guru termasuk dalam kategori sangat praktis, dan efektif ditunjukkan dengan nilai sig lebih besar dari t tabel. Hasil penelitian matematika kewirausahaan mengandung kualitas yang dapat digunakan untuk pendidikan matematika.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amalia, P. R., & Sukestiyarno, Y. L. C. A. (2021). Problem-Solving Skill Based on Learning Independence Through Assistance in Independent Learning with Entrepreneurial-nuanced Modules. Unnes Journal of Education, 11(1), 102–108. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/39883
Aminah, N., Mistima Maat, S., & Sudarsono, S. (2023). Computational Thinking Analysis Prospective Mathematics Teacher Viewed From Enterpreneur Character. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 145–152. http://journal.institutpendidikan.ac.id/index.php/mosharafa
Aminah, N., Sukestiyamo, Y., Wardono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2022). A Teaching Practice Design Based on a Computational Thinking Approach for Prospective Math Teachers Using Ed-Tech Apps. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(14), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i14.30463
Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Cahyono, A. N., & Maat, S. M. (2023). Student activities in solving mathematics problems with a computational thinking using Scratch. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23308
Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Wardono, W., & Cahyono, A. N. (2022). Computational Thinking Process of Prospective Mathematics Teacher in Solving Diophantine Linear Equation Problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1495–1507. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1495
Aminah, N., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, R., Sukestiyarno, S., Wardono, W., & Adiastuty, N. (2020). Analysis of Technology Pedagogic Content Knowledge Ability for Junior High School Teacher: Viewed TPACK Framework. 429(Icasseth 2019), 257–260. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200402.060
de Vries, S., Jansen, E. P. W. A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (2015). Student teachers’ participation in learning activities and effective teaching behaviours. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 460–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2015.1061990
Krishnawati, N., Nurihsan, J., Budimansyah, D., & Nurdin, E. S. (2023). The Role of Entrepreneurship Education in Shaping Students’ Emotional and Cognitive Competencies for Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.2.15
Nurhakim Rahadi, I., Aminah, N., Subali Noto, M., & Dwi Rosita, C. (2024). Analysis of Learning Obstacles in the Topic of Geometric Transformations. Indomath, 7(1), 48–57. https://indomath.org/index.php/
Poultsakis, S., Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Psycharis, S. (2021). The management of Digital Learning Objects of Natural Sciences and Digital Experiment Simulation Tools by teachers. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2021.02.002
Ramadanti, F., Mutaqin, A., & Hendrayana, A. (2021). Pengembangan E-Modul Matematika Berbasis PBL (Problem Based Learning) pada Materi Penyajian Data untuk Siswa SMP. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2733–2745. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.759
Ramadhani, M. H., Kartono, K., & Haryani, S. (2023). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Matematika Kela V Berbasis Discovery Learning untuk Memfasilitasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3), 2726. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i3.7574
Rossi, M. De, & Trevisan, O. (2018). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the literature: how TPCK is defined and implemented in initial teacher education Technological Pedagogical Context Knowledge (TPCK) in letteratura: come viene definito e implementato il modello TPCK nei conte. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/988
Saimima, M. P., Kurniady, D. A., Komariah, A., & Rahmawati, I. (2022). Educational Competitivenes Improvement Through Virtual Based Edupreneurship. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 5913–5921. http://journalppw.com
Sprock, A. S., Cesar, J., Gallegos, P., Dolores, M., & Calderón, V. (2014). Development Model of Learning Objects Based on the Instructional Techniques Recommendation. In International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 4(1).
Sukestiyarno, Y. (2020). Research Educational Method (First). UNNES Press.
Sukestiyarno, Y., Mashitoh, N. L. D., & Wardono, W. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability in Module-assisted Online Learning in terms of Self-efficacy. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 8(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v8i1.19898
Vaiopoulou, J., Papadakis, S., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Parents’ Perceptions of Educational Apps Use for Kindergarten Children: Development and Validation of a New Instrument (PEAU-p) and Exploration of Parents’ Profiles. Behavioral Sciences, 11(6), 82.
Wahyuni, I., Zaenuri, Wardono, Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Waluya, S. B., Nuriana, & Aminah, N. (2021). Design of instrument Technological Pedagogic Content Knowledge (TPACK) for prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042097
Yulando, S., Sutopo, S., & Franklin Chi, T. (2019). Electronic Module Design and Development: An Interactive Learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 694–698. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-10-4
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v13i1.8650
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
.png)

.png)