WORKSHEET GRAPHING QUADRATICS BERBANTUAN PhET SIMULATION UNTUK OPTIMALISASI MATHEMATICAL VISUAL THINKING MAHASISWA
(1) Universitas Serang Raya
(2) Universitas Serang Raya
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Alam, A. (2020). Pedagogy of Calculus in India: An Empirical Investigation. Alam, A.(2020). Pedagogy of Calculus in India: An Emperical Investigation. Periódico Tchê Química, 17(34), 164-180.
Arnheim, R. (2004). Visual thinking. Univ of California Press.
Astuti, D. D., & Hidayat, D. (2020). The Implementation Of Reception-Oriented Cam With Worksheets To Improve Grade 10 Students’conceptual Understanding Of Quadratic Equations And Functions In A Christian School. JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education, 3(2), 235-248.
Avigad, J. (2009). Marcus Giaquinto. Visual thinking in mathematics: An epistemological study.
Benden, D. K., & Lauermann, F. (2022). Students’ motivational trajectories and academic success in math-intensive study programs: Why short-term motivational assessments matter. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 1062.
Correia, A. P., Koehler, N., Thompson, A., & Phye, G. (2019). The application of PhET simulation to teach gas behavior on the submicroscopic level: secondary school students’ perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(2), 193-217.
Elsayed, S. A., & Al-Najrani, H. I. (2021). Effectiveness of the augmented reality on improving the visual thinking in mathematics and academic motivation for middle school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1991.
Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S., & Borba, M. C. (2020). Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. Zdm, 52(5), 825-841.
Farman, F., Hali, F., & Rawal, M. (2021). Development of e-lkpd using live worksheets for online mathematics learning during covid-19. JME (Journal of Mathematics Education), 6(1), 36-42.
Fernández-Fontecha, A., O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & Wignell, P. (2019). A multimodal approach to visual thinking: the scientific sketchnote. Visual Communication, 18(1), 5-29.
Fonger, N. L., Ellis, A. B., & Dogan, M. F. (2020). A quadratic growth learning trajectory. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59, 100795.
Graf, E. A., Peters, S., Fife, J. H., van Rijn, P. W., Arieli‐Attali, M., & Marquez, E. (2019). A Preliminary Validity Evaluation of a Learning Progression for the Concept of Function. ETS Research Report Series, 2019(1), 1-38.
Graf, E. A., Fife, J. H., Howell, H., & Marquez, E. (2018). The development of a quadratic functions learning progression and associated task shells. ETS Research Report Series, 2018(1), 1-28.
Hughes-Hallett, D., Gleason, A. M., & McCallum, W. G. (2020). Calculus: Single and multivariable. John Wiley & Sons.
Jansen, A. (2020). Rough draft math: Revising to learn. Stenhouse Publishers.
Jukić Matić, L., & Glasnović Gracin, D. (2021). How do teacher guides give support to mathematics teachers? Analysis of a teacher guide and exploration of its use in teachers' practices. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 1-20.
Kędra, J. (2018). What does it mean to be visually literate? Examination of visual literacy definitions in a context of higher education. Journal of Visual Literacy, 37(2), 67-84.
Kidron, I. (2020). Calculus teaching and learning. Encyclopedia of mathematics education, 87-94.
Krosnick, J. A. (2018). Questionnaire design. In The Palgrave handbook of survey research (pp. 439-455). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Nurdin, E. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Berbasis Pendekatan Penemuan Terbimbing untuk Memfasilitasi Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Mahasiswa. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2), 111-120.
Oktaviyanthi, R., & Agus, R. N. (2021). Guided Worksheet Formal Definition of Limit: An Instrument Development Process. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 449-461.
Övez, F. T. D. (2018). The Impact of Instructing Quadratic Functions with the Use of Geogebra Software on Students' Achievement and Level of Reaching Acquisitions. International Education Studies, 11(7), 1-11.
Presmeg, N. (2020). Visualization and learning in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of mathematics education, 900-904.
Rivera, F. D., Steinbring, H., & Arcavi, A. (2014). Visualization as an epistemological learning tool: an introduction. ZDM, 46(1), 1-2.
Roliza, E., Ramadhona, R., & Rosmery, L. (2018). Praktikalitas lembar kerja siswa pada pembelajaran matematika materi statistika. Jurnal Gantang, 3(1), 41-45.
Siagan, M. V., Saragih, S., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of Learning Materials Oriented on Problem-Based Learning Model to Improve Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Metacognition Ability. International electronic journal of mathematics education, 14(2), 331-340.
Sless, D. (2019). Learning and visual communication. Routledge.
Stanberry, M. L. (2018). Active learning: A case study of student engagement in college calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(6), 959-969.
Tho, C. C. (2022). Lesson Plan: Quadratic Functions—Graphs and Applications. In Comparison of Mathematics and Physics Education II (pp. 151-159). Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden.
Thorpe, J. A. (2018). Algebra: What should we teach and how should we teach it?. In Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 11-24). Routledge.
Ware, C. (2010). Visual thinking for design. Elsevier.
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682-683.
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., Loeblein, P., & Perkins, K. K. (2010). Teaching physics using PhET simulations. The Physics Teacher, 48(4), 225-227.
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?. American psychologist, 75(9), 1269.
Yunus, Y. S. (2021). Features of Logical Thinking of Junior Schoolchildren. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 10.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i2.6908
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
.png)

.png)