ERROR ANALYSIS OF PROSPECTIVE MATHEMATICS TEACHER IN SOLVING ADDITIONAL AND MULTIPLICATION RULES PROBLEM IN COMBINATORICS BASED ON ADVERSITY QUOTIENT

Friska Mahatri(1), jeri araiku(2*), Weni Dwi Pratiwi(3), Muhammad Yusup(4),

(1) 
(2) Universitas Sriwijaya
(3) 
(4) 
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


The background of this research is that there are still many prospective teacher students who still experience difficulties in solving addition and multiplication rules in combinatorics. This research is a qualitative descriptive research that aims to find out the mistakes of prospective teacher students in solving addition and multiplication rules in combinatorics based on adversity quitient. The research subjects were student teacher candidates in the 3rd semester of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teaching and Education, Sriwijaya University. There are stages for this research including 1) preparation stage, 2) implementation stage, 3) final stage. Data collection was in the form of questionnaires and written tests. The results of the study were that student teacher candidates who had a Quitter type adversity quotient had 0 student teacher candidates with a percentage of 0%, Camper type adversity quotient had 58 student teacher candidates with a percentage of 82.86%, Climber type adversity quotient had 12 student teacher candidates with a percentage of 17 .14%. As well as prospective teacher students in the Adversity quotient category of the Climber type, they made 4 mistakes according to Newman's procedure, namely Comprehension Error, Transformation Error, Process Skill Error and Encoding Error. Student teacher candidates in the adversity quotient category of Camperr type made 5 mistakes according to Newman's procedure, namely Reading Errors, Comprehension Errors, Transformation Errors, Process Skill Errors and Encoding Errors.

Keywords


Adversity quotient; Newman error analysis; Addition and multiplication rules; combinatorics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ammamiarihta, A. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Kombinatorika Siswa dengan Menerapkan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning di Kelas XI SMA Istiqlal Delitua. AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Matematika, 8(1).

Astuti, R. (2017) Analisis Learning Obstacles Mahasiswa dalam Mempelajari Materi Kombinatorika. Jurnal Edumath, 56-64

Cahyani, C. A & Sutriyono. (2018 Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pada Materi Operasi Penjumlahan dan Pengurangan Bentuk Aljabar Bagi Siswa Kelas VII SMP Kristen 2 Salatiga. JTAM, Vol. 2, No. 1, April 2018, Hal. 26-30

Clement, M. N. (1980). The Newman Procedure For Analysing Errors On Written Mathematical Task. Educational Student in Mathematics.

Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39:127-135

Graumann, G. 2002. General Aims Of Mathematics Education ExplainednWith Examples In Geometry Teaching.Palermo:The Mathematics Education Into The 21thCentury Project.

Hidayat, W. (2017). Adversity quotient dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry pada Materi Turunan Fungsi. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15- 28

Hutami, F. E., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Murtikusuma, R. P. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Program Linear Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient.. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 1-13

Magfirah, Maidiyah, E., Suryawati. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika berdasarkan Prosedur Newman. Lentera Sriwijaya, 1(2), halaman 1-12

Mahmudah, W. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Bertipe HOTS Berdasar Teori Newman. Unisda Journal of Mathematics and Computer, 4(1), 49-56

Stevens, Victoria. 2014. To think without thinking: The implications of combinatory play and the creative process for neuroaesthetics. American Journal of Play, 7:1.

Stoltz (2000). Adversity quotient Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Grasindo: Jakarta.

Stolz, P, G. (2005). Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Suyitno, A., Suyitno, H. (2015) Learning Therapy For Student In Mathematics Communication Correctly Based-on Application Of Newman Procedure ( A Case Of Indonesian Student). International Jurnal Of Education and Research.

Syahputra, E. (2015). Combinatorial Thinking (Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dan Contoh Alternatif Model Matematika). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika HIPPMI, tanggal 21 November 2015. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan.

Layn, M., & Kahar, M. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, Vol. 3 No. 2, 97.

Marsoni.A, Nusantar. T (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menggunakan Aturan Perkalian dan Aturan Penjumlahan. Jurnal. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan

Oktoviani, V., Widoyani, W. L., & Ferdianto, F. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. Edumatica: Jurnal PendidikanMatematika. 9(1): 39 – 46.

Rahayuningsih, S., & Octavianti, C. T. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Kombinatorik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan pendidikan Matematika

Tripathi, Pn. 2009. “Problem Solving in Mathematics: A Tool for Cognitive Development.” In Proceedings of epiSTEME 3, 168–73.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.6464

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.