PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN STRATEGI QUICK ON THE DRAW DENGAN MASALAH OPEN ENDED UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATERI PRISMA DAN LIMAS

Nurain Suryadinata(1*),

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


The aim of this research to gain the result of developing instructional sets through quick on the draw with open ended problem of pyramid and prism subject validly, practically, and effectively. The learning instrument deve-lopment using Plomp model. TKKM data processed by t test, and the proportion of z.The instructional sets valid based on the average score of validity: Syllabus 4.0; Lesson Plan 4.2; Supplementary Books 4.3; Students’ Worksheets 4.3; and creative thinking test on mathematics was valid, the level of difficulty was balance, and distinctive feature was significant and reliable. The instructional sets were practical by gaining average score 3,87, the implementation of learning process was good. Students and teachers had positive responses. The instructional sets were effective by gaining: students’ creative thinking competence of mathematics beyond the KKM; creative thinking abilities of students who were given a quick on the draw learning with open ended problems better than students were given the conventional learning; and the improvement of creative thinking competence of students who were given a quick on the draw learning with open ended problems better than students were given the conventional learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chamberlin, M. 2009. “Teachers’ Reflections on their Mathematical Learning Experiences in a Professional Development Course”. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development. Volume 11. Hal 22-35.

Dhlamini, J., & Mogari, D. 2013. “The effect of a group approach on the performance of high school mathematics learners”. Pythagoras. Vol 34 No. 2. Hal 1-9.

Fitriansyah. 2010. “Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 3 Belawang melalui Strategi Pembelajaran Quick on the Draw”. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika. Vol 1 No. 2.Hal 16-21.

Ginnis, P. 2008. Trik & Taktik Mengajar Strategi Meningkatkan Pencapaian Pengajaran di Kelas. Terjemahan Wasi Dewanto. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Kattou, M, dkk. 2012. “Connecting mathematical creativity to mathematical ability”. ZDM. Vol 45 No. 2. Hal 167-181.

Kwon, O.N., Park. J.S., & Park. J.H. 2006. “Cultivating Divergent Thinking in Mathematics through an Open-Ended Approach”. Asia Pacific Education Review. Vol 7 No.1. Hal 51-61.

Levav, W. A., & Leikin, R. 2009. “Multiple solutions for a problem: A tool for evaluation of mathematical thinking in geometry”. Dalam Guerrier, V. D., Lavergne, S. S., dan Arzarello, F. (Ed.), Proceedings of sixth conference of European Research in Mathematics Education. Lyon: Institut National de Recherche Pe´dagogique. Hal 776–785.

Mahmudi, A. 2010. Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Makalah. Konferensi Nasional Matematika XV di UNIMA..

Mason, M., dkk. 2004. Geometry For Middle School Teachers. Virginia: Virginia Department of Education.

Mullis, I. V. S., dkk. 2012. TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. United States: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

Najafi, M., Amiripour, P., & Sahahvarani, A. 2012. Application of cooperative learning method in geometry instruction. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Development. Vol 2 No.2. Hal 155-163.

Nieveen, N. 2007. “Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research”. Dalam Plomp, T., dan Nieveen, N. An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China). SLO Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

Pehkonen, E. 2007. Problem solving in mathematics education in Finland. http://www.unige.ch/math/EnsMath/Rome2008/WG2/Papers/PEHKON.pdf. (Diunduh pada 24 Januari 2014).

Rochmad. 2012. “Desain Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika”. Kreano. Vol 3 No. 1. Hal 59-72.

Rochmad. 2013. Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Kreatif Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Makalah. Seminar Nasional Matematika di UNNES. Semarang, 26 Oktober.

Siswono, T.Y.E. 2009. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pemecahan dan Pengajuan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa. Makalah Simposium Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Dan Inovasi Pendidikan Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Depdiknas.

Smith, T. J., McKenna, C. M., & Hines, E. 2013. “Association of group learning with mathematics achievement and mathematics attitude among eighth-grade students in the US”. Learning Environments Research.

Sriraman, B., Yaftian, N., Lee, K. H. 2011. “Mathematical Creativity And Mathematics Education”. Dalam Sriraman, B and Lee, K.H. (ed.). The Elements of Creativity and Giftedness in Mathematics. Sense Publishers.. Hal 119-130.

Sudiarta, I.G.P. 2006. “Pengembangan dan Implementasi Pembelajaran Matematika Berorientasi Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Open-Ended untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar”. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran UNDIKSHA. Edisi Khusus Desember.

Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., dan Clarke, B. 2013. Teaching with Tasks for Effective Mathematics Learning, Mathematics Teacher Education 9. New York: Springer.

Trianto. 2009. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif Konsep, Landasan, dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v4i1.64

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.