Penggunaan flow proof dalam pembelajaran geometri
(1) Universitas Sriwijaya
(2) Universitas Sriwijaya
(3) Universitas Sriwijaya
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan peran aktivitas menggunakan flow proof dalam pembelajaran geometri berbasis bukti siswa kelas VII SMP. Flow Proof merupakan salah satu strategi yang dapat mempermudah siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika khususnya materi geometri berbasis pembuktian. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Subyek penelitian ini adalah 39 siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 17 Palembang. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada semester genap tahun pelajaran 2021/2022. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara observasi, wawancara dan tes tertulis. Dari aktivitas pembelajaran yang telah diaplikasikan terdapat 3 aktivitas yang telah didesain menggunakan flow proof. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa serangkaian aktivitas yang dilakukan menggunakan flow proof dalam pembelajaran membantu siswa untuk membuktikan sifat-sifat jajargenjang ditinjau dari sisi, sudut dan diagonal. Kemudian Langkah-langkah yang ada pada flow proof mempermudah siswa agar dapat terbiasa untuk melakukan pembuktian.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Adeliza (2017). Model Dinamis Peningkatan Pemahaman Geometri Melalui Pembuktian. Thesis: Universitas Sumatera Utara. Diakses dari http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/13363.
Albano, G., & dello Iacono, U. (2019). A scaffolding toolkit to foster argumentation and proofs in mathematics: some case studies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0134-5.
Anwar, L., Mali, A., & Goedhart, M. J. (2021). The Effect of Proof Format on Reading Comprehension of Geometry Proof: The Case of Indonesian Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/10782
Anwar, Yuwono, I., Irawan, E. B., & As’ari, A. R. (2017). Investigation of Contigency Patterns of Teachers’ Scaffolding in Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 65–76.
Bleiler-Baxter, S. K., & Pair, J. D. (2017). Engaging students in roles of proof. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 47, 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.05.005
Cesaria, A., Herman, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2021). Level Berpikir Geometri Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Elemen, 7(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i2.2898
Cirillo, M., & Hummer, J. (2021). Competencies and behaviors observed when students solve geometry proof problems: an interview study with smartpen technology. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 53(4), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01221-w
Hanna, G., & de Villiers, M. (2008). ICMI Study 19: Proof and proving in mathematics education. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(2), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0073-4
Helma., Murni, D., & Subhan, M. (2018). Students’Ability in Analyzing by Using a Flow Proof to Solve Problems in Real-Analysis Lecture. Atlantis Press 285, 39-42. https://doi.org/10.2991/icm2e-18.2018.10.
Jones, K., & Tzekaki, M. (2016). Research on the teaching and learning of geometry. In The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: The Journey Continues (pp. 109–149). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_4
Maarif, S. (2016). Mengkonstruksi Bukti Geometri Melalui Kegiatan Eksplorasi Berbantu CABRI II Plus. Jurnal Euclid, 3(2), 517–539.
Maarif, S., Alyani, F., & Pradipta, T. R. (2020). The implementation of self-explanation strategy to develop understanding proof in geometry. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(3), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i3.9910
Mariotti, M. A., & Pedemonte, B. (2019). Intuition and proof in the solution of conjecturing problems’. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(5), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01059-3
Masfingatin, T., Murtafiah, W., & Maharani, S. (2020). Exploration of Creative Mathematical Reasoning in Solving Geometric Problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.7654.155-168
Minggi, I., & Mulbar, U. (2019). The Design Framework of Mathematical Proof Learning of Mathematics Education Department Students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 227(1), 210-213. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2015). Flow-chart proofs with open problems as scaffolds for learning about geometrical proofs. ZDM, 47(7), 1211-1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-¬-015-¬-0712-¬-5.
Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., Jones, K., & Iwanaga, Y. (2017). Designing a Web-based Learning Support System for Flow-chart Proving in School Geometry. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(3), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0034-z.
Mwadzaangati, L. (2019). Comparison of geometric proof development tasks as set up in the textbook and as implemented by teachers in the classroom. Pythagoras-Journal of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa Affiliation, 40(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/ 10.4102/pythagoras. v40i1.458.
Nadlifah, M., & Prabawanto, S. (2017). Mathematical Proof Construction: Students’ Ability in Higher Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012094.
Noto, M. S., Priatna, N., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). Mathematical Proof: The Learning Obstacles Of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers On Transformation Geometry. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5379.117-126.
Novita, R., Prahmana, R. C. I., Fajri, N., & Putra, M. (2018). Penyebab kesulitan belajar geometri dimensi tiga. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.16836
Otten, S., Gilbertson, N. J., Males, L. M., & Clark, D. L. (2014).
The Mathematical Nature of Reasoning-and-Proving Opportunities in Geometry Textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2014.857802
Rahman, A. A., & Yunita, A. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran PACE untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pembuktian Matematika Siswa di Kelas VII SMP Materi Geometri. MAJU: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmiah Matematika, 5(1), 27-38.
Sari, T. I., Aisyah, N., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2022). Lintasan Belajar SPLDV Melalui Pendekatan Model Eliciting Activities (MEAs). Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika), 4(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika
Scristia, S., Yusup, M., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2021). Pengaruh Strategi Flow Proof pada Perkuliahan Struktur Aljabar terhadap Kemampuan Mahasiswa dalam Menganalisis Pembuktian. Jurnal Gantang, 6(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v6i1.2782
Shinariko, L. J., Hartono, Y., Yusup, M., Hiltrimartin, C., & Araiku, J. (2020). Mathematical Representation Ability on Quadratic Function Through Proof Based Learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 513(1), 653-659. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Sholihah, S. Z., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2017). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Proses Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Teori Van Hielle. Mosharafa, 6(2), 287–298.
Sumarni, Hapizah, & Scristia. (2020). Student’s triangles congruence proving through flow proof strategy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1480/1/012030
Syamsuri, Marethi, I., & Mutaqin, A. (2018). Understanding on Strategies of Teaching Mathematical Proof for Undergraduate Students. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 2(1), 282–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v37i2.19091
Utari, R. S., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2015). Konteks Kebudayaan Palembang untuk Mendukung Kemampuan Bernalar Siswa SMP pada Materi Perbandingan. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 2(2), 27–37.
Waluyo, E., & Nuraini, N. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Materi Bangun Datar Sekolah Menengah Pertama. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 1273. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3586
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.5577
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
.png)

.png)