KESALAHAN KONSTRUKSI KONSEP MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI APOS PADA MATERI PROGRAM LINEAR DAN PEMBERIAN SCAFFOLDING

Yusa Putra(1), Nizlel Huda(2*), Zurweni Zurweni(3),

(1) Universitas Jambi
(2) Universitas Jambi
(3) Universitas Jambi
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mendeskripsikan proses kesalahan konstruksi konsep peserta didik berdasarkan indikator kesalahan konstruksi konsep serta mengetahui level scaffolding yang dapat diberikan berdasarkan teori APOS. Jenis penelitian adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Subjek penelitian ditentukan dengan teknik purposive sampling. Subjek penelitian berjumlah 3 orang yang sesuai dengan kriteria yang ditentukan. Instrument menggunakan soal tes dengan pengerjaan secara think aloud dan lembar wawancara. Teknik analisis data yang dilakukan dengan (1) mereduksi data (2) Menyajikan data (3) Menarik kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kesalahan konstruksi konsep matematika pada tahap Action peserta didik melakukan kesalahan lubang konstruksi, mis-logical construction, mis-analogical construction. Tahap process berupa kesalahan lubang konstruksi. Tahap Object kesalahan mis-analogical construction. Tahap Schema berupa kesalahan mis-logical construction. Pemberian scaffolding level II pada tahap Action adalah explaining dan reviewing. Tahap Process adalah explaining dan restructuring. Tahap Object adalah restructuring. Tahap Schema pemberian scaffolding level III yaitu developing conceptual thinking.

 

This study aims to analyze and describe the process of students' conceptual construction errors based on indicators of conceptual construction errors and to determine the level of scaffolding that can be given based on the APOS theory. This type of research is descriptive qualitative. Research subjects were determined by purposive sampling technique. The research subjects were 3 people who fit the specified criteria. The instrument uses test questions with think aloud workmanship and interview sheets. Data analysis techniques are carried out by (1) reducing data (2) presenting data (3) drawing conclusions. The results of the study showed that in the Action stage students made mistakes in the construction of mathematical concepts in the Action stage, they made mistakes in construction holes, mis-logical construction, mis-analogical construction. The process stage is in the form of construction hole errors. Stage Object error mis-analogical construction. The Schema stage is in the form of a mis-logical construction error. Giving scaffolding level II at the Action stage is explaining and reviewing. The Process stage is explaining and restructuring. The Object stage is restructuring. The Schema stage of giving scaffolding level III is developing conceptual thinking.


Keywords


Kesalahan konstruksi konsep, Pemberian Scaffolding, Teori APOS

References


Abdala, A., & Hamdan, A. H. E. (2021). Scaffolding Strategy and Customized Instruction Efficiency in Teaching English as a Foreign Language in the Context of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 77.33-50

Amrina, Z. (2020). Development of Problem-Based Mathematic Learning Model to Improve Creative Thinking Ability of Elementary Teacher Education Students, Bung Hatta University. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1554(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012068

Badger, K., Morrice, R., Buckeldee, O., Cotton, N., Hunukumbure, D., Mitchell, O., Mustafa, A., Oluwole, E., Pahuja, J., Davies, D., Morrell, M. J., Smith, S., & Leedham-Green, K. (2022). “More Than Just a Medical Student”: A Mixed Methods Exploration of A Structured Volunteering Programme for Undergraduate Medical Students. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1–12.

Capone, R. (2022). Blended Learning and Student-centered Active Learning Environment: A Case Study with STEM Undergraduate Students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 210–236.

Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A Literature Review: Efficacy of Online Learning Courses for Higher Education Institution Using Meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367–1385.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Reaserch Design Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.

Díaz-Berrios, T., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2022). High school student understanding of exponential and logarithmic functions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100953.

Gilbertson, K., Ewert, A., Siklander, P., & Bates, T. (2022). Outdoor education: Methods and strategies. Human Kinetics.

Hayati, T. R., & Kamid, K. (2019). Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Processes in High School Students. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(3), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i3.70

Li, X., & Taber, K. S. (2022). The Future of Interaction: Augmented Reality, Holography and Artificial Intelligence in Early Childhood Science Education. In STEM, Robotics, Mobile Apps in Early Childhood and Primary Education (pp. 415–442). Springer.

Mayorova, V. I. (2021). “Vivid Mathematics” As a General Vector of Multidisciplinary STEM Education for Future Aerospace Engineers. Acta Astronautica, 178, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.09.003

Oktaç, A. (2022). What’s New with APOS Theory? A Look Into Levels and Totality. Avances de Investigacion En Educacion Matematica, 21, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem21.4245

Parameswari, P., Chandra, T. D., & Susiswo. (2018). Pelaksanaan Scaffolding untuk Mengatasi Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah PtLSV. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 3(5), 656–670.

Salas-Velasco, M., Moreno-Herrero, D., & Sánchez-Campillo, J. (2021). Teaching Financial Education in Schools and Students’ Financial Literacy: A Cross-country Analysis with PISA Data. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(3), 4077–4103. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2005

Sihite, J., Wyrasti, A. F., & Irnandi, I. (2022). Students’ Concept Construction Errors In Online Learning. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(1), 22–35.

Simanjuntak, M. B., Suseno, M., Setiadi, S., Lustyantie, N., & Barus, I. R. G. R. G. (2022). Integration of Curricula (Curriculum 2013 and Cambridge Curriculum for Junior High School Level in Three Subjects) in Pandemic Situation. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 8(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v8i1.615

Suratih, S., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Program Linear Berdasarkan Newman’s Error Analysis. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v15i2.30990

Sutama, Prayitno, H. J., Ishartono, N., & Sari, D. P. (2020). Development of Mathematics Learning Process by Using Flipped Classroom Integrated by STEAM Education in Senior High School. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3690–3697. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080848

Syaiful, Kamid, Muslim, Huda, N., Mukminin, A., & Habibi, A. (2020). Emotional Quotient and Creative Thinking Skills in Mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080221

Tyaningsih, R. Y., Novitasari, D., Hamdani, D., Handayani, A. D., & Samijo, S. (2020). Pemberian Scaffolding terhadap Berpikir Pseudo Penalaran Siswa dalam Mengkonstruksi Grafik Fungsi. Journal of Science and Education (JSE), 1(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.56003/jse.v1i1.9

Villamar, A. J., Gayagoy, M., Matalang, F., & Catacutan, K. J. (2020). Usefulness of Mathematics Subjects in the Accounting Courses in Baccalaureate Education. Mathematics and Statistics, 8(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.13189/ms.2020.080103

Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Fischer, F., Reiss, K., & Ufer, S. (2022). Adaptable Scaffolding of Mathematical Argumentation Skills: The Role of Self-regulation When Scaffolded with CSCL Scripts and Heuristic Worked Examples. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1–26.

Wahyudi, W. (2017). Scaffolding Sesuai Gaya Belajar Sebagai Usaha Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 7(02), 144. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v7i2.1803

Winarso, W., & Toheri, T. (2021). An Analysis of Students’ Error in Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: The Perspective of David Kolb’s Theory. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(1), 139–150.

Wulandari, S., & Gusteti, M. U. (2021). Defragmentation of Preservice Teacher’s Thinking Structures in Solving Higher Order Mathematics Problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1940(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1940/1/012099

Zimmerman, H. T., & Land, S. M. (2022). Supporting children’s place-based observations and explanations using collaboration scripts while learning-on-the-move outdoors. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1–28.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.5292

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.