Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Diskusi dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lampung Timur

Desty Septianawati(1*),

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


The aims of this research are to know: (1) Which one more effective, learning using discussion with realistic mathematicsĀ  approach or a conventional learning. (2) Which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, student with personality types Sanguine or Phlegmatis. (3) Which one more effective for each personality typeof students, learning using discussion withPMR or a conventional learning.This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of state junior high school in East Lampung Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the samples was 202 students. The data collection technique were the document that was the last of examination theseven grade for initial capability data before the experiment, achievement tests for mathematics student achievement data, and questioner of personality types. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows: (1) learning mathematics using discussion with PMR is more effective than learning mathematics usingdiscussion with conventional approach. (2) Students with personalitytypesof Sanguinenor Phlegmatis have the same mathematics achievement. (3) For each personality type of students, learning using discussion with PMR approach is more effective than learning mathematics the method of discussion withconventional approach.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barnes, H. 2004. Realistic mathematics education: Eliciting alternative mathematical conceptions of learners. African Journal of Research in SMT Education, Volume 8 (1), pp. 53-64. Diunduh dari http://p4mristkipgarut. files.wordpress.com/2010/11/realistic-mathematics-education eliciting-alternative-mathematical -conceptions-of-learners-hayley-barnes.pdf pada 21 Juli 2012.

Feza-Piyose, N. 2012. Language: A Cultural Capital For Conceptualizing Mathematics Knowledge. Human Sciences Research Council, South Africa. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 67-79.

Heni Mularsih. 2010. Strategi Pembelajaran, Tipe Kepribadian Dan Hasil Belajar Bahasa Indonesia Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Makara, Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 14, No. 1, 65-79. Diunduh dari http://journal.ui.ac.id/ index. php/humanities/article/viewFile/573/569 pada11 Januari 2013.

Littauer, F. 1996. Personality Plus: (Kepribadian Plus). Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara.

Nelly Fitriani. 2012. Penerapan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik secara Berkelompok untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Self Confidence Siswa SMP: Studi Kuasi Eksperimen pada Siswa Kelas VIII Salah Satu SMP Negeri di Ngamprah. Tesis. UPI. Bandung. Diunduh dari http://repository. upi.edu/tesisview.php? no_tesis=2 pada 21 Juli 2012.

Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. 2011. Pemanfaatan Hasil Ujian Nasional untuk Perbaikan Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional.

R. Soedjadi. 2000. Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi.

Sigid Edy Purwanto. 2010. Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP dan MTs melalui Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik. Disertasi. UPI. Bandung. Diunduh dari http://repository.upi.edu/ disertasiview.php? no_disertasi=233 pada 21 Juli 2012.

Sutarto Hadi. 2005. Pendidikan Matematika Realistik dan Implementasinya. Banjarmasin: Tulip.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v3i2.31

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.