PENGEMBANGAN SOAL KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS BAGI PESERTA DIDIK SEKOLAH DASAR

Authors

  • Hafiziani Eka Putri Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Titin Nurrohmat Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Tiara Yogiarni Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Teten Ginanjar Rahayu Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Alfiana Nurussama Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Fitri Nuraeni Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Mariano Dos Santos Instituto Católico para Formação de Professores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v15i3.16323

Keywords:

Kemampuan representasi matematis, pengembangan instrumen tes, sekolah dasar

Abstract

Kemampuan representasi matematis menjadi keterampilan penting dalam pembelajaran abad ke-21 karena membantu peserta didik memahami konsep, menyelesaikan masalah, serta mengomunikasikan ide matematika melalui berbagai bentuk penyajian. Namun, kemampuan representasi matematis peserta didik sekolah dasar masih belum berkembang optimal, salah satunya karena instrumen evaluasi yang digunakan di sekolah cenderung bersifat rutin dan lebih menekankan perhitungan prosedural. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen tes kemampuan representasi matematis peserta didik sekolah dasar pada materi pecahan sederhana, khususnya perbandingan pecahan setengah dan seperempat. Penelitian menggunakan metode Research and Development (R&D) model ADDIE meliputi tahap analysis, design, development, implementation, dan evaluation. Uji coba instrumen dilakukan pada 22 peserta didik kelas III pada salah satu sekolah dasar negeri di kabupaten Bandung, Jawa Barat. Jumlah tersebut merupakan populasi total peserta didik kelas III pada sekolah yang dipilih secara purposive (total sampling di dalam kelompok terpilih), sehingga uji coba ini bersifat sebagai studi awal (pilot testing) yang perlu dikonfirmasi lebih lanjut pada sampel yang lebih besar dan lintas sekolah. Instrumen yang dikembangkan terdiri dari 10 butir soal tes uraian, mewakili 3 indikator kemampuan representasi matematis, yaitu representasi verbal (3 butir soal), representasi simbolik (4 butir soal), dan representasi visual (3 butir soal). Produk instrumen tes divalidasi oleh ahli, kemudian diuji cobakan untuk memperoleh data empiris uji validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya pembeda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dari 10 butir soal yang dikembangkan, terdapat 9 butir soal memenuhi kriteria valid, sedangkan 1 butir soal dinyatakan tidak valid. Instrumen memiliki koefisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,90 (sangat tinggi). Hasil analisis tingkat kesukaran menunjukkan soal berada pada kategori sedang hingga mudah, sedangkan daya pembeda didominasi kategori baik dan sangat baik. Kesimpulannya berdasarkan hasil tersebut, 9 dari 10 butir soal tes yang dikembangkan dinyatakan layak digunakan sebagai alat ukur kemampuan representasi matematis peserta didik sekolah dasar.

Mathematical representation skills are essential in 21st-century learning because they help students understand concepts, solve problems, and communicate mathematical ideas through various forms of presentation. However, the mathematical representation skills of elementary school students have not yet developed optimally, partly because the assessment instruments used in schools tend to be routine and emphasize procedural calculations. This study aims to develop a test instrument to assess elementary school students’ mathematical representation skills on the topic of simple fractions, specifically comparing one-half and one-quarter. This study uses the Research and Development (R&D) method with the ADDIE model, consisting of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. The instrument was tested on 22 third-grade students at a public elementary school in Bandung Regency, West Java. The developed instrument consists of 10 open-ended items based on three indicators: verbal representation (3 items), symbolic representation (4 items), and visual representation (3 items). Expert validation was conducted before the pilot test to obtain empirical data on validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discriminative power. The results show that 9 items met validity criteria, while 1 item was invalid. The reliability coefficient was 0.90, categorized as very high. Difficulty level analysis indicates that the items are mostly moderate to easy, while discriminative power is predominantly good and very good. In conclusion, 9 of the 10 developed items are suitable for measuring elementary school students’ mathematical representation skills.

 

References

Amelia, R. N., Aji, S., Kriswantoro, K., & Sukmasari, H. (2022). Proof of Unidimensionality in Cognitive Test Instrument for Evaluation Science Learning. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 6(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v6i1.1897

Dzulkifli, M., Syam, S., & Chandra. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Representatif Matematis dalam Operasi Penjumlahan, Pengurangan, Perkalian, dan Pembagian pada Siswa Kelas III Sekolah Dasar. Bilangan : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Kebumian Dan Angkasa, 3(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.62383/bilangan.v3i2.482

Fatrina, A., Nuraeni, Z., Mulyono, B., Yukans, S. S., & Mansyur, N. (2025). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Kelas VII Menggunakan Problem Based Learning Berbantuan E-LKPD. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education, 09(01), 197–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v9i1.187

Ing, M., Jong, C., & Shih, J. C. (2024). Validity Evidence of the Use of Quantitative Measures of Students in Elementary Mathematics Education. School Science and Mathematics, 124(6), 411–423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12660

Irmawan, & Rohartati, S. (2025). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SD. TANGGAP: Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.55933/tjripd.v5i2.839

Istiqomah, R., Rufiana, I. S., & Handayani, T. (2024). Optimalisasi Problem Based Learning dalam Meningkatkan Representasi Matematis dan Kepercayaan Diri Siswa Kelas IV SD. Journal of Innovation and Teacher Professionalism, 3(2), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.17977/um084v3i22025p411-419

Khairunnisa, Darhim, Priatna, N., & Juandi, D. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Translasi Representasi Matematis Mahasiswa Pada Materi Program Linear. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 7(2), 240–253. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v7i2.8051

Kim, Y. H., Kim, B. H., Kim, J., Jung, B., & Bae, S. (2024). Item Difficulty Index, Discrimination Index, and Reliability of the 26 Health Professions Licensing Examinations in 2023, Korea: A Psychometric Study. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 21, Article 40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.40

Komala, E., Suryadi, D., & Dasari, D. (2021). Kemampuan Representasi: Implementasi Pengembangan Desain Didaktis pada Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Menengah Atas. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2179–2187. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.3971

Latifah, U., Fatqurhohman, & Sugiyantoro, E. (2025). Peningkatan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Peserta Didik melalui Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Google Sheets. Mandalika Mathematics and Education Journal, 7(2), 874–890. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v7i2.8986

Magdalena, I., Fauziah, S. N., Faziah, S. N., & Nupus, F. S. (2021). Analisis Validitas, Reliabilitas, Tingkat Kesulitan Dan Daya Beda Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Tema 7 Kelas III SDN Karet 1 Sepatan. BINTANG : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sains, 3(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.36088/bintang.v3i2.1291

Misdalina, Rohana, Isroqmi, A., & Septiati, E. (2025). Pengembangan Soal Berpikir Komputasional Matematis bagi Mahasiswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 14(4), 1428–1439. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v14i4.9924

Prananto, I. W., Rakhmawati, Y., & Pamungkas, T. (2022). Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Content Validity Index (CVI) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Mathematics Learning Independence Instruments. Kontinu: Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika, 6(2), 116–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30659/kontinu.6.2.116-132

Putri, H, E., Nuraeni, F., Rosalia, E., & Haftani, D. (2020). Development of Mathematical Connection Ability Instruments for Elementary School Students. ICMScE International Conference On Mathematics And Science Education, 2024, 482–491. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15585

Putri, H. E., Alam, B. C., Rahayu, P., Alindra, A. L., Hikmatunisa, N. P., Nuraeni, F., Krisnawati, N., Universitas, P., & Indonesia, P. (2025). Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Peserta Dididk Di Sekolah Dasar. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1), 1007–1018. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i01.21239

Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, A. K. (2017). Using Reliability and Item Analysis to Evaluate a Teacher-Developed Test in Educational Measurement and Evaluation. Cogent Education, 4(1), Article 1301013. https://doi.org/https:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301013

Roebianto, A., Savitri, S. I., Aulia, I., Suciyana, A., & Mubarokah, L. (2023). Content Validity: Definition and Procedure of Content Validation in Psychological Research. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology (TPM), 30(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM30.1.1

Schadl, K., & Ufer, S. (2025). Searching for Efficient and Informative Instruments to Digitally Monitor Fraction Learning : Putting Tests for Fraction Subconstruct Knowledge and Informal Fraction Knowledge on the Test Bench. Frontiers in Education, 9(January), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1367942

Sugiyono. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suningsih, A., & Istiani, A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.984

Villegas, J. L., Castro, E., & Gutiérrez, J. (2009). Representations in Problem Solving: A Case Study with Optimization Problems. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(1), 279–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v7i17.1342

Winata, W., Widiyasari, R., Pramuditya, S. A., Anwar, H., & Ramadhanty, K. P. (2025). Difficulties in Learning Mathematics : Qualitative Studies Using NVivo 15. Educational Process: International Journal, 17, Article e2025397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.397

Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Cronbach’s Alpha in Mathematics Education Research: Its Appropriateness, Overuse, and Alternatives in Estimating Scale Reliability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1074430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430

Zakariya, Y. F. (2023). Approaches to learning mathematics : preliminary evidence of a concise , valid , and reliable instrument. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(October), 1–10.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1286394

Published

31-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles