A COMPREHENSIVE TOOL FOR ASSESSING CREATIVE THINKING IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

Iqbal Ma’ruf Al Ashari(1), Lathiful Anwar(2*), I Made Sulandra(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Universitas Negeri Malang
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


In education, creativity is viewed as a fundamental behaviour especially when it comes to mathematics where students are motivated to tackle problems in unique ways. The present study sought to design, construct and validate an instrument that would assess creativity in geometry by employing three aspects of creativity as proposed by the aforementioned model- fluency, flexibility and originality. The instrument was administered to 30 junior high school students in Malang Indonesian. In this study, the assessment of internal and external consistent validity and dimensional structure of the instrument using a combination of Cronbach’s Alpha, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and inter-rater reliability was done. The reliability estimates showed that across the 7-item test, a validation score of Cronbach’s Alpha at 0.857 was achieved. Item-Total Statistics indicated that most items possessed high item-total correlations except item Q3 which possessed low item-total corrected correlation. EFA resulted in the segregation of 2 components which accounted for 81.280% of the variance of the construct and were labeled as fluency/flexibility and originality. This finding is consistent with already existing theories in creativity areas which argue that creative thinking is a multi-faceted phenomenon. This needs elucidation in order to improve the validity of the affected test items especially those aimed at measuring the different dimensions of creativity. The research enriches the existing literature based on creativity in mathematics education considering the primary aim to develop a sound and valid tool for assessing students' creative problem solving abilities in geometry.

Keywords


Creative thinking, Geometry education, Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, Exploratory factor analysis, Reliability, Validity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aytekin, A., & Topcu, M. S. (2024). Improving 6th Grade Students’ Creative Problem Solving Skills Through Plugged and Unplugged Computational Thinking Approaches. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10130-y

Cropley, A. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28(3), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554351

Field, A. P. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 5th edition. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:69843782

Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step : a simple guide and reference (Fourteenth edition). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/id/11177168

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. In The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill.

Handayani, U. F., Sa’Dijah, C., Sisworo, Sa’Diyah, M., & Anwar, L. (2020). Mathematical creative thinking skill of middle-ability students in solving contextual problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215(April). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000645

Joklitschke, J., Rott, B., & Schindler, M. (2022). Notions of Creativity in Mathematics Education Research: a Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(6), 1161–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10192-z

Kandemir, M. A., Tezci, E., Shelley, M., & Demirli, C. (2019). Measurement of Creative Teaching in Mathematics Class. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641677

Khalil, R. Y., Tairab, H., Qablan, A., Alarabi, K., & Mansour, Y. (2023). STEM-Based Curriculum and Creative Thinking in High School Students. Education Sciences, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121195

Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring Mathematical Creativity Using Multiple Solution Tasks. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:210545834

Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.11.001

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (2007). Psychometric theory : Nunnally and Bernstein, 3rd edition. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:119066053

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why Isn’t Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1

Purnomo, H., Sa’dijah A, C., Permadi, H., Anwar, L., Tejo, E., & Cahyowati, D. (2022). Mathematical Creative Processing Abilities of Junior High School Students’ in Numeracy Tasks.

Purnomo, H., Sa’dijah, C., Permadi, H., Anwar, L., & Cahyowati, E. T. D. (2023). Mathematical creative processing abilities of junior high school students’ in numeracy tasks. 040012. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113667

Razumnikova, O. M. (2012). Divergent Thinking and Learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1028–1031). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_580

Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice (2nd edition). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-06920-7

Runco, M. A. (2022). Divergent Thinking. In V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible (pp. 429–436). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_31

Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x

Sriraman, B. (2005). Are Giftedness and Creativity Synonyms in Mathematics? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-389

Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking (1974 revision). Princeton, N.J.: Personal Press/Ginn and Company.

Torrance, E. P. (Ellis P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Princeton, N.J. : Personnel Press, 1966.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v14i2.11199

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.