Pengembangan Cognitive Flexibility Inventory dengan Analisis Pemodelan Rasch
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/gdn.v15i1.10377Keywords:
Cognitive Flexibility, Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI), Rasch Modeling, StudentsAbstract
The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) is a short 20-item self-report questionnaire that can be used to measure individual cognitive flexibility in thinking adaptively to an ever-changing environment. This study aims to develop a cognitive flexibility inventory instrument in the Indonesian context and test the instrument using Rasch modeling analysis. The research method used was a survey with a cross-sectional survey design. The research sample was 170 students of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. The research instrument used is the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) adapted from Dennis & Vander Wal (2010) and has been translated from English to Indonesian. The results showed that the development of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) instrument based on Rasch modeling analysis has excellent instrument reliability with a Cronbach alpha value of 0.87 logits, and CFI can measure what should be measured in this study, namely cognitive flexibility in students. For this reason, the development of the CFI instrument in Indonesian produced good results and has the potential to be widely implemented in the university environment.References
Arici-Ozcan, N., Cekici, F., & Arslan, R. (2019). The relationship between resilience and distress tolerance in college student: The mediator role of cognitive flexibility and difficulties in emotion regulation. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(4), 525-533. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.4.525
Aslan, Ş., & Türk, F. (2022). Comparison of concepts of cognitive flexibility and psychological flexibility. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar-Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 14(1), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.917360
AvÅŸar, V., & Pekmezci, F. (2023). Rescaling of cognitive flexibility inventory by critism of turkish adaptation form. International Journal of Cognitive Flexibility, 16, 682-709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-023-00188-8
Boone, W. J., Staver, J., & Yale, M. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4
Chen, X., He, J., & Fan, X. (2019). Relationships between openness to experience, cognitive flexibility, self-esteem, and creativity among bilingual college students in the U.S. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(1), 342-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1688247
Chung, S.-H., Su, Y.-F., & Su, S.-W. (2012). The impact of cognitive flexibility on resistance to organizational change. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal, 40(5), 735-746. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.5.735
Clément, E. (2022). Cognitive flexibility: The cornerstone of learning. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, fourth edition. Pearson.
Dajani, D. R., & Uddin, L. (2015). Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and development neuroscience. Trends in Neurosciences, 38(9), 571-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.003
Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
Fisher, W. P. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Retrieved from Rasch.org: https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt211m.htm
Fourn´e, S. P., Guessow, D., Margolin, M., & Schaffer, U. (2023). Controllers and strategic decision-making: The role of cognitive flexibility in controller-manager collaboration. Management Accounting Research, 60, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100840
Gürpınar, A. C., & İkiz, F. (2022). The investigation of mindfulness, cognitive flexibility and mental symptoms of teacher trainess. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(2), 275-290.
Hendriks, J., Fyfe, S., Styles, I., Skinner, S., & Merriman, G. (2012). Scale construction utilising the Rasch unidimensional measurement model: A measurement of adolescent attitudes towards abortion. Australasian Medical Journal, 5(5), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.4066%2FAMJ.2012.952
Kamal, N. N., Adnan, A. M., Yusof, A., Ahmad, M., & Kamal, M. M. (2019). Immersive interactive educational experiences-adopting education 5.0, industry 4.0 learning technologies for malaysian universities. Proceedings: International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, 190-196.
Kurginyan, S. S., & Osavolyuk, E. (2018). Psychometric properties of a russian version of the cognitive flexibiliy inventory (CFI-R). Frontiers in Psychology, 9(845), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00845
Lonescu, T. (2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.11.001
Martin, M. M., & Anderson, C. (1998). The cognitive flexibility scale: Three validity studies. Communication Reports, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219809367680
Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623-626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623
Martins, J. T., & Gonçalves, J. (2022). Cognitive flexibility and the work context: Integrative literature review. Psicologia: Teoria e Prática, 24(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5935/1980-6906/ePTPSP14027.en
Melnyk, L., Kubatko, O., & Dehtyarova, I. (2019). The effect of industrial revolutions on the transformation of social and economic systems. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.31
Morris, L., & Mansell, W. (2018). A systematic review of the relationship between rigidity/flexibility and transdiagnostic cognitive and behavioral processes that maintain psychopatholgy. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043808718779431
Navarro, M. C., Molinares, N., & Mebarak, M. (2021). Psychometric study of the cognitive flexibility inventory in a colombian sample. International Journal of Psychological, 15(1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5371
Önen, A. S., & Koçak, C. (2015). The effect of cognitive flexibility on higher school students' study strategies. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2346-2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.680
Portoghese, I., Lasio, M., Conti, R., Mascia, M., Hitchcott, P., Agus, M., . . . Penna, M. (2020). Cognitive flexibility inventory: Factor structure, invariance, reliability, convergent, and discriminant validity among Italian university students. PsyCh Journal, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.401
Sahin, S. B. (2022). Examination of university students' perceptions of the career future in terms of tolerance for uncertainty and cognitive flexibility. Journal of Career Review, 1(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7492831
Shareh, H., Farmani, A., & Soltani, E. (2014). Investigating the reliability and validity of the cognitive flexibility inventory (CFI-I) among iranian university students. Practice in Clinical Psychology, 2(1), 43-50.
Savickas, M. L. (2012). Life design: A paradigm for career intervention in the 21st century. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90(1), 13-19. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1556-6676.2012.00002.x
Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. D. Brown, & R. Lent, Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work second editon (pp. 147-186). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J.-P., Duarte, M., Guichard, J., . . . Vianen, A. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.004
Sick, J. (2010). Assumptions and requirements of Rasch measurement. SHIKEN: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 14(2), 23-29.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.
Tanhan, F., Özok, H., Kaya, A., & Yıldırım, M. (2024). Mediating and moderating effects of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between social media addiction and phubbing. Current Psychology, 43, 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04242-8
Tavares, M. C., Azevedo, G., & Marques, R. P. (2022). The challenges and opportunities of era 5.0 for a more humanistic and sustainable society - A literature review. Societies, 12(149), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060149
Törmäkangas, K. (2011). Advantages of the rasch measurement model in analysing educational tests: an applicator's reflection. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17(5), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2011.630562
Wati, M., Mahtari, S., Hartini, S., & Amalia, H. (2019). A rasch model analysis on junior high school students' scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 13(7), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i07.10760
Yu, C., Beckmann, J., & Birney, D. (2019). Cognitive flexibility as a meta-competency / flexibilidad cognitiva como meta-competencia. Estudios de PsicologÃa, 40(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2019.1656463
Zou, Y., Li, P., Hofmann, S., & Liu, X. (2020). The mediating role of non-reactivity to mindfulness training and cognitive flexibility: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01053
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling agree to the following terms:
GUIDENA: Journal Of Guidance And Counseling, Psychology, And Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. GUIDENA offers all authors of journal articles allows their research openly available, free access and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in GUIDENA in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of GUIDENA are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, GUIDENA as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
