CRISP-SET QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS (CSQCA): KONFIGURASI KONDISI YANG BERPENGARUH TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF MATEMATIKA SISWA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i3.7399Keywords:
condition, cs-QCA, mathematical reflective thinking, outcome, thresholdAbstract
CS-QCA is based on set theory, but its use in research in the field of mathematics is not much. The cs-QCA method dichotomizes independent variables (in QCA they are called conditions) and outcomes to be two: true [1] to declare full membership, and false [0] for non-membership. This study aims to find the configuration of conditions that affect the ability to think mathematically reflective. The research was conducted at SMA Negeri 8 Tangerang Selatan in the Odd Semester of the 2022/2023 Academic Year. The results of the analysis conclude that high mathematical reflective abilities can be obtained from a combination of high learning environment conditions and high learning resources and high experience and high economics, or it can also be obtained from high interest and learning environment and high learning resources and experience. high, or high interest and high learning environment and low learning resources and low experience and high economics, or high interest and low learning environment and high learning resources and low learning experience and high economics.References
Anggraini, Y., & Patmanthara, S. (2017). Pengaruh Lingkungan Belajar Dan Disiplin Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kompetensi Keahlian Elektronika Industri Di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/
Chotimah, L. N., Ani, H. M., & Widodo, J. (2018). Pengaruh Status Sosial Ekonomi Orang Tua Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN EKONOMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial, 11(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpe.v11i2.6457
Dhiki, Y. Y., & Bantas, M. G. D. (2021). Eksplorasi Etnomatematika Sebagai Sumber Belajar Matematika Di Kabupaten Ende. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2698. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4254
Fahrurrozi, F., Sari, Y., & Wiguna, P. (2022). Studi Literatur: Pengaruh Status Sosial Ekonomi Orang Tua terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(4), 5472–5479. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3009
Fainshmidt, S., Witt, M. A., Aguilera, R. v., & Verbeke, A. (2020). The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. In Journal of International Business Studies (Vol. 51, Issue 4, pp. 455–466). Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00313-1
Fritzsche, E. (2014). Making hermeneutics explicit: how QCA supports an insightful dialogue between theory and cases. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(4), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.779778
Hajar, Y., Yanwar, R., & Fitrianna, A. Y. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa Smp Ditinjau Dari Disposisi Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 1(1), 79–91.
Halim, S. N. H., & Rahma, R. (2020). Pengaruh Lingkungan Belajar, Motivasi Belajar dan Kemandirian Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 9 Pangkep. Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal, 2(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v2i2.1777
Hatip, A., & Listiana, Y. (2019). Minat, Kemandirian Dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Dalam e-Learning Berbasis Edmodo. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i3.2261
Hidayat, P. W., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan minat belajar siswa dalam mengerjakan soal open ended dengan pendekatan CTL. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v13i1.21167
Huzaevah, F. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa SMP Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Standar Pisa Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender. Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 222–236.
Kartono, Arumsasi, P. D., & Mariani, S. (2019). Analysis of students’ mathematical reflective thinking on problem based learning (PBL) based from learning styles. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 34–41.
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., & Aguilera, R. (2016). Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282.
Mudakir, N. F., Suratno, J., & Angkotasan, N. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Program Linear. Saintifik@ Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 5(1), 21–26.
Pagliarin, S., la Mendola, S., & Vis, B. (2023). The “qualitative†in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): research moves, case-intimacy and face-to-face interviews. Quality & Quantity, 57(1), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01358-0
Parker, B. L. (2017). Crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA) and Criminology. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology. https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.e9eca896
Prisila, I. P., Hernawati, D., Ali, M., & Triyanto, S. A. (2021). Korelasi Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Terhadap Self-Confidence. Jurnal Metaedukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(1).
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy set and beyond. The University of Chicago Press.
Rahmi, N., Zubainur, C. M., & Marwan. (2020). Students’ mathematical reflective thinking ability through scaffolding strategies. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012022
Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017). An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 2(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.12.002
Sager, F., & Thomann, E. (2017). Multiple streams in member state implementation: politics, problem construction and policy paths in Swiss asylum policy. Journal of Public Policy, 37(3), 287–314.
Samsiar. (2019). Urgensi Learning Resources (Sumber Belajar) Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Didaktika, 13(2), 194–205.
Schneider, M. R., & Eggert, A. (2014). Embracing complex causality with the QCA method: An invitation. Jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, 7(1), 312–328.
Setiawan, A., Nugroho, W., & Widyaningtyas, D. (2022). Pengaruh Minat Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VI SDN 1 Gamping. TANGGAP : Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.55933/tjripd.v2i2.373
Smela, M. (2021). The Qualitative Comparative Analysis: An Overview of a Causal Complexity Approach. SHS Web of Conferences, 92, 08020. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219208020
Thomann, E., & Maggetti, M. (2020). Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(2), 356–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729700
Umbara, F. D. A. D., & Herman, T. (2023). Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematis Terbuka Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 1273. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.6807
Wulansari, M. D., Purnomo, D., & Utami, R. E. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa Kelas VIII dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Visual dan Auditorial. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(6), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v1i6.4869
Yenni, Y., & Sukmawati, R. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Berdasarkan Minat Belajar Pada Mata Kuliah Struktur Aljabar. Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 4(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v4i2.2283
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
Creative Commons License
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. AKSIOMA offers all authors of journal articles allows their research openly available, free access and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in AKSIOMA in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of AKSIOMA are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, AKSIOMA as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
.png)
.png)
