MENYELISIK PENELITIAN TERKAIT DIAGNOSTIK KOGNITIF MATERI MATEMATIKA DI INDONESIA MELALUI SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
(1) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(2) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(3) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(4) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(5) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Sejumlah penelitian telah dilakukan terkait diagnostik kognitif di Indonesia yang telah terpublikasi di jurnal-jurnal nasional terakreditasi. Namun, belum ada kajian yang melakukan analisis dan pengklasifikasian terhadap artikel-artikel tersebut. Oleh karena itu, tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis artikel-artikel terkait diagnostik kognitif materi matematika di Indonesia sehingga kemudian dapat dilakukan pengklasifikasian terhadap aspek-aspek hasil analisis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode systematic literature review (SLR) melalui tahapan: 1) penetapan jurnal ilmiah sasaran pencarian artikel; 2) pencarian artikel ilmiah; 3) penyaringan artikel ilmiah; 4) penilaian kualitas dan kelayakan artikel ilmiah; dan 5) analisis serta pengklasifikasian data. Adapun data yang digunakan adalah 15 artikel yang berasal dari 9 jurnal ilmiah terakreditasi Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi terkategori Sinta 1 dan Sinta 2 yang memiliki focus and scope pendidikan (umum), pendidikan dasar, dan pendidikan matematika serta terpublikasi selama rentang waktu 10 tahun terakhir. Dari 15 artikel yang dianalisis, hanya 6 artikel yang terkategori “layak”. Hasil analisis memberikan luaran berupa pengklasifikasian artikel penelitian terkait diagnostik kognitif materi matematika di Indonesia menjadi lima aspek, yaitu tujuan penelitian, metode penelitian, jenjang pendidikan, ruang lingkup materi, dan publikasi instrumen tes.
Several studies have been conducted regarding cognitive diagnostics in Indonesia, which have been published in accredited national journals. However, no research has conducted analysis and classification of these articles. Therefore, this study aims to analyze articles related to cognitive diagnostics in mathematics in Indonesia so that later the aspects of the analysis results can be classified. This study used the systematic literature review (SLR) method through the following stages: 1) determining the target scientific journals; 2) searching for articles; 3) screening of articles; 4) assessing the quality and feasibility of articles; and 5) data analysis and classification. The data used are 15 articles from 9 scientific journals accredited by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology in the Sinta 1 and Sinta 2 categories, which have the focus and scope of education (general), basic education, and mathematics education and have been published over a while last 10 years. Only 6 over 15 analyzed articles were categorized as "decent". The analysis results provide an output in the form of classifying research articles related to cognitive diagnostics of mathematics in Indonesia into five aspects, namely research objectives, research methods, educational levels, the scope of material, and publication of test instruments.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Abdullah, A. H., Shin, B., & Abdurrahman, M. S. (2020). A comparative study of mathematics assessment practices between Malaysian and South Korean secondary schools mathematics teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5015–5035. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081102
Abidin, M., & Retnawati, H. (2019). A diagnosis of difficulties in answering questions of circle material on junior high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.16454
Amin, A. K. (2016). Diagnostic of students’ difficulties in solving mathematics problems of national examination year 2015/2016. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/0.23917/jramathedu.v2i2.3495
Asrul, Ananda, R., & Rosnita. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Citapustaka Media.
Azis, & Sugiman. (2015). Analisis kesulitan kognitif dan masalah afektif siswa SMA dalam belajar matematika menghadapi ujian nasional. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7331
Cecep, A. H. F. S. (2018). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah, efisiensi kognitif dan self-determination matematis mahasiswa melalui metode pembelajaran worked-example dengan self-explanation prompting [Doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Chauhan, S. (2011). Slow learners: Their psychology and educational programmes. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(8), 279–289.
Çiltaş, A., & Tatar, E. (2011). Diagnosing learning difficulties related to the equation and inequality that contain terms with absolute value. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 461–473.
Dasaradhi, K., Rajeswari, Ch. S. R., & Badarinath, P. V. S. (2016). 30 Methods to improve learning capability in slow learners. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities, 4(2), 556–570.
Duskri, M., Kumaidi, & Suryanto. (2014). Pengembangan tes diagnostik kesulitan belajar matematika di SD. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2123
Firmansyah, D. (2015). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran dan minat belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Judika (Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika), 3(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.35706/judika.v3i1.199
Fitriani, R., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2021). Penelitian Implementasi Pembelajaran Matematika bagi Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus di Indonesia. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 1293–1307. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3968
Fitrianna, A. Y., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2021). Identification of junior high school students’ error types in understanding concept about relation and function. Infinity, 10(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p175-190
Garofalo, J., & Lester Jr, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/748391
Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040301
Hartini, A., Widyaningtyas, D., & Mashluhah, M. I. (2017). Learning Strategies for Slow Learners Using the Project Based Learning Model in Primary School. 1(70), 29–39.
Hasibuan, H. Y., Santosa, C. A. H. F., & Syamsuri. (2022). Slow learners’ performance in solving mathematical problems in the inclusive classroom. Jurnal Elemen, 8(2), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i2.5181
Hassan, A., & Mahmud, M. (2018). Learning motivation for slow learners with tablet technology. International Journal for Studies on Children, Women, Elderly And Disabled, 5, 201–210.
Hendrayana, A. (2017). Mengatasi cognitive load pada anak. FKIP Untirta Publishing.
Ikhsan, M. (2019). Pengaruh kecemasan matematis terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. De Fermat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v2i1.28
Irzani. (2010). Pengembangan tes diagnostik kesulitan belajar matematika di SMA. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/276
Istiyani, R., Muchyidin, A., & Rahardjo, H. (2018). Analysis of student misconception on geometry concepts using three-tier diagnostic test. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v37i2.14493
Kadarisma, G., Fitriani, N., & Amelia, R. (2020). Relationship between misconception and mathematical abstraction of geometry at junior high school. Infinity, 9(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p213-222
Ketterlin-geller, L. R., & Yovanoff, P. (2009). Diagnostic assessments in mathematics to support instructional decision making. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https:://doi.org/10.7275/vxrk-3190
Kusaeri. (2012). Menggunakan model dina dalam pengembangan tes diagnostik untuk mendeteksi salah konsepsi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i1.1118
Lame, G. (2019). Systematic literature reviews: An introduction. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), 2019-August, 1633–1642. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.169
Laulita, U., Marzoan, & Rahayu, F. (2022). Analisis kesiapan guru dalam mengimplementasikan asesmen diagnostik pada kurikulum merdeka. JPIn: Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia, 5(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.47165/jpin.v5i2.348
Leighton, J., & Gierl, M. (Eds.). (2007). Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education: Theory and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611186
Lestari, I. (2013). Pengaruh waktu belajar dan minat belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i2.118
Mohamed, S. H., & Tarmizi, R. Ah. (2010). Anxiety in mathematics learning among secondary school learners: A comparative study between Tanzania and Malaysia. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.068
Mundia, L. (2012). The assessment of math learning difficulties in a primary grade-4 child with high support needs: Mixed methods approach. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(2), 347–366.
Mutmainna, D., Mania, S., & Sriyanti, A. (2018). Pengembangan instrumen tes diagnostik pilihan ganda dua tingkat untuk mengidentifikasi pemahaman konsep matematika. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2018v6n1a6
Nguyen, T. T. T., Nguyen, T. P. T., Tran, T., & Dao, L. T. (2015). Designing a classification toolkit for mathematically-deficient 4th grade students: A case study in Vietnam. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Res, 14(2), 68–86.
Nor, N. A. K. M., Ismail, Z., & Yusof, Y. M. (2016). The relationship between emotional intelligence and mathematical competency among secondary school students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.2.3534.91-100
Nursalam. (2016). Diagnosis kesulitan belajar matematika: Studi pada siswa SD/MI di kota Makassar. Lentera Pendidikan, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2016v19n1a1
Parameswari, P., Chandra, T. D., & Susiswo. (2018). Pelaksanaan scaffolding untuk mengatasi kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah PtLSV. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(5), 656–670. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i5.11091
Pingge, H. D. (2016). Faktor yang mempengaruhi hasil belajar siswa sekolah dasar di kecamatan kota Tambolaka. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 4(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v4i2.6458
Prihatni, Y., Kumaidi, & Mundilarto. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen diagnostik kognitif pada mata pelajaran IPA di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 111–125. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. (2020). Buku saku asesmen diagnosis kognitif berkala. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Rofiah, N. H., & Rofiana, I. (2017). Penerapan metode pembelajaran peserta didik slow learner (Studi kasus di sekolah dasar inklusi Wirosaban Yogyakarta). Naturalistic: Jurnal Kajian Penelitan Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v2i1.108
Santosa, C. A. H. F., & Hasibuan, H. Y. (2022). Implementasi penguatan numerasi berbasis budaya di Indonesia. In S. Solihah (Ed.), Prosiding Galuh Mathematics National Conference (GAMMA NC) 2022 (pp. 1–9). Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Galuh. https://gammanatconference.unigal.ac.id/index.php
Santosa, C. A. H. F., Prabawanto, S., & Marethi, I. (2019). Fostering germane load through self-explanation prompting in calculus instruction. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 1(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v1i1.7421
Santosa, C. A. H. F., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Syamsuri. (2018). The role of worked-example in enhancing students’ self-explanation and cognitive efficiency in calculus instruction. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v0i0.19602
Sembiring, R. B., & Mukhtar. (2013). Strategi pembelajaran dan minat belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.24114/jtp.v6i2.4996
Setyaningtyas, A. D., Dwiyana, & Muksar, M. (2018). Miskonsepsi siswa SMP kelas IX pada materi bentuk akar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(6), 731–738. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i6.11127
Shantika, E. G., & Istiyono, E. (2019). A diagnosis of students’ errors in answering the mathematics test in senior high school. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.16370
Siagian, R. E. F. (2012). Pengaruh minat dan kebiasaan belajar siswa terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 2(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v2i2.93
Sirait, E. D. (2016). Pengaruh minat belajar terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 6(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v6i1.750
Sovia, A., & Herman, T. (2019). Slow learner errors analysis in solving integer problems in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14(3), 1281–1288.
Supriyadi, Lia, R. M., Rusilowati, A., Isnaeni, W., Susilaningsih, E., & Suraji. (2022). Penyusunan instrumen asesmen diagnostik untuk persiapan kurikulum merdeka. Journal of Community Empowerment, 2(2), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.15294/jce.v2i2.61886
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
Vasudevan, A. (2017). Slow learners – Causes, problems and educational programmes. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(12), 308–313.
Vionita, A., & Hartono. (2021). Kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal operasi bilangan model ujian negara tingkat SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v8i1.16447
Waluyo, E. M., Muchyidin, A., & Kusmanto, H. (2019). Analysis of students misconception in completing mathematical questions using certainty of response index (CRI). Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 4(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i1.2988
Wasida, M. R., & Hartono. (2018). Analisis kesulitan menyelesaikan soal model ujian nasional matematika dan self-efficacy siswa SMA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.10060
Whyte, J., & Anthony, G. (2012). Maths anxiety: The fear factor in the mathematics classroom. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 9(1), 6–15.
Wijaya, A., Retnawati, H., Setyaningrum, W., Aoyama, K., & Sugiman. (2019). Diagnosing students’ learning difficulties in the eyes of Indonesian mathematics teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 357–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7798.357-364
Wijaya, M. H., Suratno, & H P, A. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik mata pelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i1.1359
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yusron, E., & Sudiyatno. (2021). How is the impact of assessment for learning (AfL) on mathematics learning in elementary schools? Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v9i1.34865
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i2.6886
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
.png)

.png)