LITERASI MATEMATIKA SISWA GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD DEPENDENT DAN FIELD INDEPENDENT DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL TRIGONOMETRI

Arnaningtyas Rofi'i(1*), I Nengah Parta(2), Rustanto Rahardi(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Universitas Negeri Malang
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Studi pendahuluan yang dilakukan peneliti membuktikan bahwa siswa belum mampu menerapkan konsep, prosedur, fakta dan alat-alat matematika. Hal ini mengakibatkan rendahnya literasi matematika contohnya dalam menerapkan rancangan model matematika. Penelitian. ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh deskripsi literasi matematika tipe gaya kognitif field independent (FD) dan field dependent (FI) pada siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal trigonometri. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 4 siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Srengat terdiri dari kuat lemahnya kategori gaya kognitif field independent dan field dependent. Instrumen pada penelitian ini menggunakan lembar wawancara dan lembar tes yang terdiri dari GEFT dan tes literasi matematika. Analisis tes literasi matematika mengacu pada indikator dari tiga tahapan literasi matematika yang dikembangkan dari OECD (2021) yaitu merumuskan (formulate), menggunakan (employ), interpretasi (interprete). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) subjek FD lemah (FDL) mampu memenuhi satu tahapan literasi matematika merumuskan (formulate); (2) subjek FD kuat (FDK) mampu pada satu tahapan literasi matematika merumuskan (formulate); (3) subjek FI lemah (FIL) mampu menguasai ketiga tahapan literasi matematika dengan tahapan menggunakan (employ) konsep perbandingan trigonometri; (4) subjek FI kuat (FIK) mampu menguasai ketiga tahapan literasi matematika dengan tahapan menggunakan  (employ) konsep aturan sinus dalam segitiga sebarang.

 

A preliminary study conducted by researchers proved that students were not yet able to apply mathematical concepts, procedures, facts and tools. This results in low mathematical literacy, for example in implementing mathematical model plans. This research aims to obtain a description of mathematical literacy types of Field Independent (FD) and Field Dependent (FI) cognitive styles in students in solving trigonometry problems. The subjects of this research were 4 class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Srengat consisting of strong and weak categories of Field Independent and Field Dependent cognitive styles. The instruments in this research used interview sheets and test sheets consisting of GEFT and mathematical literacy tests. The analysis of the mathematics literacy test refers to indicators from the three stages of mathematics literacy developed by OECD (2021), namely formulating, employing, interpreting. The results of the research show that: (1) weak FD (FDL) subjects are able to fulfill one stage of formulating mathematical literacy; (2) strong FD subjects (FDK) are able to formulate at one stage of mathematical literacy; (3) weak FI (FIL) subjects are able to master the third stage of mathematical literacy with the stage of using (using) the concept of trigonometric comparisons; (4) Strong FI (FIK) subjects are able to master the third stage of mathematical literacy with the stage of using (using) the concept of the sine rule in any triangle.


Keywords


field dependent; field independent; mathematical literacy

References


Abidin, Z., & In’am, A. (2017). Filsafat dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Intelegensia Madia.

Amalia, A., Fathurrohman, M., & Fatah, A. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Pada Materi Turunan Fungsi Aljabar Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Riset Pendidikan Matematika, X(X), 1–11. http://www.jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/wilangan

Amamah, S., Sa’dijah, C., & Sudirman. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMP Bergaya Kognitif Field Dependent dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Berdasarkan Teori Pemrosesan Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 237–245. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/6128

Asdar, S. A. A. R. (2015). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Dan Efikasi Diri Pada Siswa Kelas Viii Unggulan Smpn 1 Watampone. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 3(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v3i1.1313

Creswell. J.W. (2016). Planing Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (second). In Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. (Vol. 4). University of Nebraska.

Edimuslim, E., Edriati, S., & Mardiyah, A. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa SMA. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v5i2.8055

Ehmke, T., van den Ham, A. K., Sälzer, C., Heine, J., & Prenzel, M. (2020). Measuring mathematics competence in international and national large scale assessments: Linking PISA and the national educational panel study in Germany. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65(February), 100847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100847

Kusuma, D., Sukestiyarno, Y. ., Wardono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2019). The Characteristics of Mathematical Literacy Based on Students’ Executive Function. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 193–206.

Nasrullah, A., & Marsigit, M. (2016). Keefektifan problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi, metode, dan sikap matematis. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.11180

Nugrahanto, S., & Zuchdi, D. (2019). Indonesia PISA Result and Impact on The Reading Learning Program in Indonesia. International Conference on Interdisciplinary Language, Literature and Education (ICILLE 2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/icille-18.2019.77

Nur, A. S., & Palobo, M. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif dan Gender. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(2), 139–148. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/kreano%0AProfil

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading, and Science. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publications.

OECD. (2016). Results from PISA 2015: Indonesia. OECD Publishing, 1–8. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Indonesia.pdf

OECD. (2019). Assassement and Analytical framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy.

OECD. (2021). Pisa 2022 mathematics framework. OECD Publishing.

Pakpahan. (2016). Factors Affecting Literacy Mathematics Achievement of Indonesian Student in PISA 2012. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 6, 143–152.

Pratiwi, I. (2019). PISA Effect On Curriculum In Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 51.

Rahayu, D., Mulyono, & Cahyono, A. (2020). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Kelas Viii Di Mtsn 1 Tulungagung. Seminar Nasional Pascasatjanan UNNES, 2019. http://repo.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/17447/

Rifqiyana, L., Masrukan, & Susilo, B. E. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VIII Dengan Pembelajaran Model 4K Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 40–46.

Riyatuljannah, T., & Fatonah, S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Pada Penyelesaian Soal Berorientasi Konten Quantity. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v9i1.10089

Rizki, L. M., & Priatna, N. (2019). Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088

Rohmah, F., Qohar, A., & Raharjo, S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pisa konten change and relationship. AKSIOMA : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v11i2.6256

Sari, D. U., Adam, P., Kodirun, & Busnawir. (2019). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa kelas VIII SMP ditinjau dari gaya belajar dan perbedaan gender. Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika, 4(1), 23–34. http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/56963

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Alfabeta.

Sumardi, & Amalia, I. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Literasi Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 2296–2305.

Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001

Susanto, H. (2015). Pemahaman pemecahan masalah berdasar gaya kognitif. Deepublish.

Utomo, M., Pujiastuti, H., & Mutaqin, A. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. 11(2), 185–193. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/kreano

Yeldham, M., & Gao, Y. J. (2021). Examining whether learning outcomes are enhanced when L2 learners’ cognitive styles match listening instruction methods. System, 97, 102435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102435

Zikl, P., Havlíčková, K., Holoubková, N., Hrníčková, K., & Volfová, M. (2015). Mathematical Literacy of Pupils with Mild Intellectual Disabilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2582–2589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.936




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i3.6837

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.