ELICITING ACTIVITIES MODEL ON STUDENTS' MATHEMATICAL LITERACY ABILITY

Ummu Sholihah(1*), Vera Dewi Susanti(2),

(1) UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung
(2) Universitas PGRI Madiun
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


The low level of mathematical literacy in Indonesia is caused by the selection of an inappropriate learning model. The purpose of this study is to review various references related to the eliciting activities model and mathematical literacy. The type of research method used is Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Data collection used library research. A literature study was obtained by searching the sites scopus.com, scimagojr.com, and Google Scholar and grouping the data using publish or perish. From the data obtained, 5 articles were selected from international proceedings and articles from reputable journals. Articles will be reviewed and analyzed with supporting references. The results of this study are known that improving students' mathematical literacy skills depends on the learning model provided and how educators can choose an appropriate learning model and apply the learning model properly. The eliciting activities model can also improve mathematical literacy by modifying learning models with various approaches. In addition, teachers also need to pay attention to each step in the eliciting activities model so that learning objectives can be achieved.


Rendahnya literasi matematika di Indonesia diakibatkan pemilihan model pembelajaran yang kurang tepat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengulas berbagai referensi terkait model eliciting activities dan literasi matematika. Jenis metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Pengumpulan data menggunakan studi pustaka.. Studi pustaka diperoleh dengan  melakukan search proccess  situs scopus.com, scimagojr.com dan google scholar dan  pengempokkan data tersebut menggunakan publish or perish. Data yang sudah diperoleh dipilih 5 artikel dari prosiding internasional dan artikel dari jurnal bereputasi. Artikel akan diulas dan dianalis dengan diperkuat referensi pendukung. Hasil penelitian ini diketahu bahwa peningkatan   kemampuan   literasi   matematika   siswa bergantung dengan  model  pembelajaran  yang  di  berikan dan bagaimana pendidik dapat memilih model pembelajaran yang sesuai dan menerapkan model pembelajaran tersebut dengan baik. Model eliciting activities juga dapat meningkatkan literasi matematika dengan memodifikasi model pembelajaran dengan berbagai pendekatan. Selain itu juga guru perlu memperhatikan setiap langkah pada model eliciting activities agar tujuan pembelajaran dapat tercapai.



Keywords


Mathematical Literacy Ability; Eliciting Activities Model; System Literature Review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abassian, A., Safi, F., Bush, S., & Bostic, J. (2020). Five different perspectives on mathematical modeling in mathematics education. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 12(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2019.1595360

Akera, A. (2019). ABET & Engineering Accreditation - History , Theory , Practice : Initial Find- ings from a National Study on the Governance of Engineering Education ABET & Engineering Accreditation — History , Theory , Practice : Initial Findings from a National Study on. 126th ANNUAL Conference & Exposition. https://www.asee-prism.org/126th-annual-conference-exposition/

Anggralia, R. (2019). Pengaruh Pendekatan Model-Eliciting Activities ( MEAs ) terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 09(2013).

Atsnan, M. F., Gazali, R. Y., & Nareki, M. L. (2018). Pengaruh pendekatan problem solving terhadap kemampuan representasi dan literasi matematis siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i2.20120

Baker, C. K., & Galanti, T. M. (2017). Integrating STEM in elementary classrooms using model-eliciting activities: responsive professional development for mathematics coaches and teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0066-3

Blum, W. (2015). Quality Teaching of Mathematical Modelling: What Do We Know, What Can We Do? In The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 73–96). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_9

Budiman, H., & Syayyidah, K. N. (2018). Penerapan Pembelajaran Model Eliciting Activities (Meas) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa. Delta: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.31941/delta.v6i1.540

Chamberlin, S., & Coxbill, E. (2012). Model-Eliciting Activities To Introduce Upper Elementary Students To Statistical Reasoning and Mathematical Modeling. Uwyo.Edu, 26(15). http://www.uwyo.edu/wisdome/_files/documents/chamberlin_coxbill.pdf

Cheema, J. R. (2018). Effect of math-specific self-efficacy on math literacy: Evidence from a Greek survey. Research in Education, 102(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523717741914

Clark, R. M., Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & Yildirim, T. P. (2008). Use of model eliciting activities to improve problem solving by industrial engineering students. IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2008, 110–115.

Dede, A. T., Hidiroğlu, Ç. N., & Guzel, E. B. (2017). EXAMINING OF MODEL ELICITING ACTIVITIES DEVELOPED BY MATHEMATICS STUDENT TEACHERS. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.2.3997.223-242

Fitriah, H., Mahatmanti, F. W., & Wahyuni, S. (2012). Komparasi Pembelajaran MEA Dan PBL Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas VIII Pada Materi SPLDV. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(2), 1110–1115. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ijcs

Graven, M., & Venkat, H. (2007). Emerging pedagogic agendas in the teaching of mathematical literacy. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2007.10740622

Guler, G., Sen, C., Ay, Z. S., & Ciltas, A. (2019). Engineering skills that emerge during model-eliciting activities (MEAs) based on 3D modeling done with mathematics pre-service teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(3), 251–270.

Hamilton, E., Lesh, R., Lester, F., & Brilleslyper, M. (2008). Model-eliciting activities (MEAs) as a bridge between engineering education research and mathematics education research. Advances in Engineering Education, 1(2), 1–25.

Handajani, S., Pratiwi, H., & Mardiyana, M. (2018). The 21st century skills with model eliciting activities on linear program. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1008(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012059

Hjelte, A., Schindler, M., & Nilsson, P. (2020). Kinds of mathematical reasoning addressed in empirical research in mathematics education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 10(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100289

Jumadi, J. (2017). PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN MODEL-ELICITING ACTIVITIES (MEAs) DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH SISWA KELAS XII SMA N 2 YOGYAKARTA. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v8i2.1874

Kaye Stacey, R. T. (2015). Assessing Mathematical Literacy (K. Stacey & R. Turner (eds.)). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7

Kaygısız, İ., & Şenel, E. A. (2023). Investigating mathematical modeling competencies of primary school students: Reflections from a model eliciting activity. Journal of Pedagogical Research. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202317062

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2002). Helping Children Learn Mathematics. In Helping Children Learn Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.17226/10434

Lesh, R. A., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Beyond Constructivism. Beyond Constructivism, 35(6), 325–329. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607713

Lubis, N. H., Su, P., Fauzi, K. M. S. M. A., & Pd, M. (2017). Model Eliciting Activities (MEA) Application in Online Group Discussion for Mathematics Learning. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(7), 1330–1333. https://doi.org/10.21275/art20174533

Lusiana, & Suryani, M. (2014). Metode SLR untuk Mengidentifikasi Isu-Isu dalam Software Engineering. SATIN (Sains Dan Teknologi Informasi), 3(1), 1–11. http://jurnal.stmik-amik-riau.ac.id/index.php/satin/article/view/347

Mavugara-shava, F. M. (2005). Teaching for Mathematical Literacy in Secondary and High Schools in Lesotho : University of The Free State.

Mena, A. B. (2016). Literasi Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v7i2.6756

Moody, S., Hu, X., Kuo, L. J., Jouhar, M., Xu, Z., & Lee, S. (2018). Vocabulary instruction: A critical analysis of theories, research, and practice. Education Sciences, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040180

Mujib, M., Mardiyah, M., & Suherman, S. (2020). STEM : Pengaruhnya terhadap Literasi Matematis dan Kecerdasan Multiple Intelligences. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i1.5448

Niss, M., & Jablonka, E. (2020). Mathematical Literacy. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 548–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing.

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy : are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.

Paloloang, M. F. B., Juandi, D., Tamur, M., Paloloang, B., & Adem, A. M. G. (2020). META ANALISIS: PENGARUH PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIS SISWA DI INDONESIA TUJUH TAHUN TERAKHIR. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 851. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3049

Pane, N., Syahputra, E., & Mulyono, M. (2017). Model-Eliciting Activities Approach as a Tool to Improve Creative Thinking Skills and Self-Confidence. 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2017), 104(January). https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-17.2017.85

Risma. (2016). Perbandingan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Dan Model Eliciting Activities ( MEA ) Pada Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Patallassang Kab . Gowa. UIN Alauddin Makassar.

Setiani, C., Waluya, S. B., & Wardono. (2018). Analysis of mathematical literacy ability based on self-efficacy in model eliciting activities using metaphorical thinking approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012139

Stohlmann, M. S. (2017). Mathematical Modeling with Middle School Students: The Robot Art Model-Eliciting Activity. European Journal of STEM Education, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/76360

Tabun, H. M., Taneo, P. N. L., & Daniel, F. (2020). Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa pada Pembelajaran Model Problem Based Learning (PBL). Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(01), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v10i01.8796

Umbara, U., & Suryadi, D. (2019). Re-interpretation of mathematical literacy based on the teacher’s perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12450a

Venkat, H., Graven, M., Lampen, E., & Nalube, P. (2009). Critiquing the mathematical literacy assessment taxonomy: Where is the reasoning and the problem solving? Pythagoras, 0(70), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v0i70.38

Wahyuni, I., Noto, M. S., & Hikmah, A. N. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Metaphorical Thinking Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa. Euclid, 3(1), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v3i1.319

Werner Blum, Peter L. Galbraith, Hans-Wolfgang Henn, M. N. (2007). Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education (W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (eds.); Vol. 10). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1

Wijayanti, R., Waluya, S. B., & Masrukan. (2018). Analysis of mathematical literacy ability based on goal orientation in model eliciting activities learning with murder strategy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012141

Wright, K. L., Franks, A. D. (2016). Both theory and practice: Science literacy instruction and theories of reading. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1275–1292.

Yang, X., Kuo, L. J., & Jiang, L. (2020). Connecting Theory and Practice: a Systematic Review of K-5 Science and Math Literacy Instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09957-4

Yildirim, T. P., Shuman, L., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2010). Model-Eliciting Activities: Assessing engineering student problem solving and skill integration processes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 831–845.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.6608

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.