Students' Mathematical Understanding in Solving Mathematics Problems from Theory Perspective of Schemp's Understanding
(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Universitas Negeri Malang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to describe students' mathematical understanding in solving mathematical problems from the perspective of Skemp's theory of understanding which consists of instrumental understanding and relational understanding. This type of research is descriptive qualitative in which students' mathematical understanding in solving exponential problems is described based on the results of mathematical understanding tests and interviews. This research was conducted in class X SMA Darul Faqih Indonesia and the research subjects were taken from students with high, medium, and low mathematical abilities, each of which was represented by two subjects from each category.The results of this study indicate that students with high mathematical abilities are able to find mathematical relationships, apply them, and explain the reasons, which include relational understanding. Students with moderate mathematical ability are able to apply memorized procedures in finding solutions to problems but are unable to explain the reasons, which include instrumental understanding. Meanwhile, students with low mathematical ability have low mathematical understanding because they are unable to meet the indicators of relational understanding and instrumental understanding. This study recommends that students with low mathematics abilities are trained to apply mathematical theory to increase their understanding into instrumental understanding while students with moderate mathematical abilities are trained to find mathematical theory to increase their understanding into relational understanding.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Annisa, M., Aan, H., & Tatang, H. (2019). Analysis of Students Mathematical Understanding Viewed from Visual and Visual-Auditory Learning Styles. 1st International Seminar STEMEIF (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Learning International Forum) Purwokerto, 386–393.
Brownell, W. A. (1944). The Progressive Nature of Learning in Mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 37(4), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.37.4.0147
Bush, S. B., & Karp, K. S. (2013). Prerequisite algebra skills and associated misconceptions of middle grade students: A review. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.07.002
Cangelosi, R., Madrid, S., Cooper, S., Olson, J., & Hartter, B. (2013). The negative sign and exponential expressions: Unveiling students’ persistent errors and misconceptions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.10.002
Goldin, G. A. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(99)80056-1
Halim, S. N. H., Mahmud, R. S., Tahir, S. R., Gaffar, A., Wulandari, S., & Trisnowali, A. (2021). Analyzing Misconception of Exponent for High School in Makassar. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education (ICMMEd 2020), 550(Icmmed 2020), 430–433. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210508.100
Kulle, R., Asri, D. C., & Wiyanti, W. (2016). The Error Analysis of Algebra Operation on the Form of Exponent at the SMAN 22 Tangerang. Proceeding of The 4 Th International Symposium on Mathematics Education, November, 312–322.
Kuncorowati, R. H., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2017). The Analysis of Student ’ s difficulties Based on Skemp ’ s Understanding Theorem at The Grade VII in Quadrilateral Topic. 2(1), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16736
Minarni, A., Napitupulu, E. E., & Husein, R. (2016). Mathematical understanding and representation ability of public junior high school in North Sumatra. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2816.43-56
NCTM. (2000). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. The National Council of Theacher of Mathematics Inc.
Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method (2nd ed). Double Day and Co.
Qomariah, N. (2016). Kuadratditinjau Dari Perbedaan Kepribadian Extrovert Dan Introvert. Apotema: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 2, 87–95.
Rachmawati, I., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2021). Analysis of 7th Grade Student’s Mathematical Understanding in Solving Sets Problem: A Perspective of Skemp Understanding Theory. Proceedings of the International Conference of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (I-CMME 2021), 597, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211122.018
Rahmad, B. A., Ipung, Y., Abdur, R. A., Sisworo, & Dwi, R. (2016). Mathematical representation by students in building relational understanding on concepts of area and perimeter of rectangle. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(21), 2002–2008. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.2813
Ramdhani, M. R., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2017). Student’s mathematical understanding ability based on self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 909, 012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012065
Safitri, A. N., Juniati, D., & Masriyah. (2018). Students’ Relational Understanding in Quadrilateral Problem Solving Based on Adversity Quotient. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012039
Sahin, Z., Yenmez, A. A., & Erbas, A. K. (2015). Relational understanding of the derivative concept through mathematical modeling: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1149a
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. The Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.5951/at.26.3.0009
Skemp, R. R. (1979). Intelligence, learning, and action: A foundation for theory and practice in education. Wiley.
Utomo, D. P. (2019). Instrumental and Relational Understanding Analysis of 5th Grade Elementary School Students on Integers Addition. 349(Iccd), 668–670. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccd-19.2019.176
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i2.6510
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
.png)

.png)