ERROR ANALYSIS OF PROSPECTIVE MATHEMATICS TEACHER IN SOLVING ADDITIONAL AND MULTIPLICATION RULES PROBLEM IN COMBINATORICS BASED ON ADVERSITY QUOTIENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.6464Keywords:
Adversity quotient, Newman error analysis, Addition and multiplication rules, combinatoricsAbstract
The background of this research is that there are still many prospective teacher students who still experience difficulties in solving addition and multiplication rules in combinatorics. This research is a qualitative descriptive research that aims to find out the mistakes of prospective teacher students in solving addition and multiplication rules in combinatorics based on adversity quitient. The research subjects were student teacher candidates in the 3rd semester of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teaching and Education, Sriwijaya University. There are stages for this research including 1) preparation stage, 2) implementation stage, 3) final stage. Data collection was in the form of questionnaires and written tests. The results of the study were that student teacher candidates who had a Quitter type adversity quotient had 0 student teacher candidates with a percentage of 0%, Camper type adversity quotient had 58 student teacher candidates with a percentage of 82.86%, Climber type adversity quotient had 12 student teacher candidates with a percentage of 17 .14%. As well as prospective teacher students in the Adversity quotient category of the Climber type, they made 4 mistakes according to Newman's procedure, namely Comprehension Error, Transformation Error, Process Skill Error and Encoding Error. Student teacher candidates in the adversity quotient category of Camperr type made 5 mistakes according to Newman's procedure, namely Reading Errors, Comprehension Errors, Transformation Errors, Process Skill Errors and Encoding Errors.References
Ammamiarihta, A. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Kombinatorika Siswa dengan Menerapkan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning di Kelas XI SMA Istiqlal Delitua. AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Matematika, 8(1).
Astuti, R. (2017) Analisis Learning Obstacles Mahasiswa dalam Mempelajari Materi Kombinatorika. Jurnal Edumath, 56-64
Cahyani, C. A & Sutriyono. (2018 Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pada Materi Operasi Penjumlahan dan Pengurangan Bentuk Aljabar Bagi Siswa Kelas VII SMP Kristen 2 Salatiga. JTAM, Vol. 2, No. 1, April 2018, Hal. 26-30
Clement, M. N. (1980). The Newman Procedure For Analysing Errors On Written Mathematical Task. Educational Student in Mathematics.
Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39:127-135
Graumann, G. 2002. General Aims Of Mathematics Education ExplainednWith Examples In Geometry Teaching.Palermo:The Mathematics Education Into The 21thCentury Project.
Hidayat, W. (2017). Adversity quotient dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry pada Materi Turunan Fungsi. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15- 28
Hutami, F. E., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Murtikusuma, R. P. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Program Linear Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient.. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 1-13
Magfirah, Maidiyah, E., Suryawati. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika berdasarkan Prosedur Newman. Lentera Sriwijaya, 1(2), halaman 1-12
Mahmudah, W. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Bertipe HOTS Berdasar Teori Newman. Unisda Journal of Mathematics and Computer, 4(1), 49-56
Stevens, Victoria. 2014. To think without thinking: The implications of combinatory play and the creative process for neuroaesthetics. American Journal of Play, 7:1.
Stoltz (2000). Adversity quotient Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Grasindo: Jakarta.
Stolz, P, G. (2005). Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
Suyitno, A., Suyitno, H. (2015) Learning Therapy For Student In Mathematics Communication Correctly Based-on Application Of Newman Procedure ( A Case Of Indonesian Student). International Jurnal Of Education and Research.
Syahputra, E. (2015). Combinatorial Thinking (Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dan Contoh Alternatif Model Matematika). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika HIPPMI, tanggal 21 November 2015. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan.
Layn, M., & Kahar, M. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, Vol. 3 No. 2, 97.
Marsoni.A, Nusantar. T (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menggunakan Aturan Perkalian dan Aturan Penjumlahan. Jurnal. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan
Oktoviani, V., Widoyani, W. L., & Ferdianto, F. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. Edumatica: Jurnal PendidikanMatematika. 9(1): 39 – 46.
Rahayuningsih, S., & Octavianti, C. T. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Kombinatorik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan pendidikan Matematika
Tripathi, Pn. 2009. “Problem Solving in Mathematics: A Tool for Cognitive Development.†In Proceedings of epiSTEME 3, 168–73.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:

Creative Commons License
AKSIOMA:Â Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. AKSIOMA offers all authors of journal articles allows their research openly available, free access and time restrictions.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in AKSIOMA in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of AKSIOMA are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, AKSIOMA as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).