INTERFERENSI PROAKTIF DAN RETROAKTIF DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH PERBANDINGAN SENILAI DAN BERBALIK NILAI

Fatus Atho'ul Malik(1*), Purwanto Purwanto(2), Subanji Subanji(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Universitas Negeri Malang
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Interferensi berpikir merupakan fenomena yang terjadi ketika dua informasi tercampur dalam proses pemecahan masalah matematika, khususnya pada topik perbandingan senilai dan berbalik nilai. Fenomena ini penting untuk diteliti karena konsep perbandingan berkaitan erat dengan konsep matematika lainnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap terjadinya interferensi berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah perbandingan senilai dan berbalik nilai. Subjek dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari dua siswa kelas VII A dan VII B yang terindikasi mengalami interferensi proaktif dan retroaktif. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di MTs Sunan Kalijogo Kota. Metode penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan intereferensi retroaktif terjadi ketika konsep perbandingan senilai dipengaruhi konsep perbandingan berbalik nilai. Hal tersebut dikarenakan kemiripan prosedur perbandingan senilai dan berbalik nilai. Akibantnya, siswa menggunakan prosedur perbandingan berbalik nilai dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan perbandingan senilai. Sedangkan, interferensi proaktif terjadi ketika konsep perbandingan senilai mempengaruhi konsep perbandingan berbalik nilai. Hal tersebut dikarenakan memori siswa terhadap perbandingan senilai lebih kuat daripada perbandingan berbalik nilai. Akibatnya, Akibantnya, siswa menggunakan prosedur perbandingan senilai dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan perbandingan berbalik nilai.

In solving mathematics problems, sometimes students make errors caused by mixing two pieces  information. This phenomenon is known as interference. One of the problems can cause interference is the problem of directly proportional and inversely proportional. Interference in solving the problem of directly proportional and inversely proportional is importent to know because the concept of proportional is related to other mathematical concepts. This research aims to reveal the occurence of students’ thinking interference in solving the problem of directly proportional and inversely proportional. The subjects in this reserach consisted two of students in class VII A and VII B who had indications of experiencing proactive and retroactive interference. This research  was conducted at MTs Sunan Kalijogo Malang City from 1 to 30 september 2022. The research method is descriptive qualitative. The results of this research show that retroactive interference occurs when the concept of directly proportional is disturbed by the concept of inversely proportional. It is based on similarity the procedure in problem solving of directly proportional and inversely proportional. As a result, students use the procedure of inversely proprotional for solving the problem of directly proportional. While proactive interference when the concept of directly proportional disturbes the concept of inversely proportional.  This is because students' memory for direct proportion is greater than indirect proportion. As a result, students use the procedure of directly proprotional for solving the problem of inversely proportional.


Keywords


Interference, proactive, proportional, retroactive

References


Ahn, D., & Chan, J. C. K. (2022). Does testing enhance new learning because it insulates against proactive interference? Memory and Cognition, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01273-7

Antequera-Barroso, J. A., Revuelta-Domínguez, F. I., & Antequera, J. G. (2022). Similarities in Procedures Used to Solve Mathematical Problems and Video Games. Education Sciences, 12(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030172

Archambeau, K., Visscher, A. De, Noël, M., & Gevers, W. (2019). Impact of ageing on problem size and proactive interference in arithmetic facts solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818759262

Arican, M. (2018). Preservice Middle and High School Mathematics Teachers’ Strategies when Solving Proportion Problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9775-1

Arican, M., & Kiymaz, Y. (2022). Investigating Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Definitions, Formulas, and Graphs of Directly and Inversely Proportional Relationships. Mathematics Enthusiast, 19(2), 632–656. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1566

Browers, C. S., & Ho, H. W. L. (2022). Seeing through their eyes: the diversity and inclusion lessons learned from rural university students. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 16(1), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/heed-12-2020-0053

Chamberlin, S., Payne, A. M., & Kettler, T. (2020). Mathematical modeling: a positive learning approach to facilitate student sense making in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1788185

Cragg, L. (2016). The Development of Stimulus and Response Interference Control in Midchildhood. Developmental Psychology, 52(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000074

Endress, A. D. (2022). Memory and Proactive Interference for spatially distributed items. Memory and Cognition, 50(4), 782–816. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01239-1

Georgiou, A., Katkov, M., & Tsodyks, M. (2021). Retroactive interference model of forgetting. Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13408-021-00102-6

Hidayanto, E., & Budiono, E. (2019). Students’ Thinking Interference in Understanding Functions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1227(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1227/1/012015

Hu, Y., & Chen, Z. (2022). Learning Human Cognitive Appraisal Through Reinforcement Memory Unit. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2208.03473. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03473

Ibrahim, Sujadi, I., Maarif, S., & Widodo, S. A. (2021). Increasing Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills Using Advocacy Learning with Mathematical Problem Solving. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v8i1.19200

Irfan, M., Nusantara, T., Subanji, & Sisworo. (2018). Why Did The Students Make Mistakes in Solving Direct and Inverse Proportion Problem? International Journal of Insights for Mathematics Teaching, 1(1), 25–34.

Irfan, M., Sudirman, & Rahardi, R. (2018). Characteristics of students in comparative problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948, 1–11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-%0A6596/948/1/012007

Jitendra, A. K., Harwell, M. R., Karl, S. R., Slater, S. C., Simonson, G. R., & Nelson, G. (2016). A Replication Study to Evaluate the Effects of Schema-Based Instruction on Middle School Students’ Proportional Problem-Solving Performance. SREE Spring Conference, (612), 1–10. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567215

Jusmawati, Satriawati, Akhiruddin], Rahman, A., Arsyad, N., & Irman, R. (2021). Developing Mathematics Learning Devices Based On Creative Problem Solving Model in Elementary School. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 406–421. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5n1.1807

Kliegl, O., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2021). Buildup and release from proactive interference – Cognitive and neural mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 120, 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.028

Lee, W. T., Hazeltine, E., & Jiang, J. (2022). Interference and Integration in Hierarchical Task Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001246

Lestari, A. P., Hidayanto, E., & Sukoriyanto, S. (2021). Proactive Interference of Seventh Grade Students in Solving Problems of The Greatest Common Divisor. AIP Conference Proceedings, 7(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043382

Matlin, M. W. (2013). Cognition (8th Ed). United State of America: John Wiley & Sons.

McBride, D. M., & Cutting, J. C. (2018). Cognitive Psychology: Theory, Process, and Methodology (2 Edition). California: SAGE Publications.

Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2022). Differential Effects of Proactive and Retroactive Interference in Value-Directed Remembering for Younger and Older Adults. Psychology and Aging. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000707

Oates, J. M., Peynircioğlu, Z. F., & Bates, K. B. (2016). Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference ? Current Psychology, 35(4), 632–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1

Orban, S. A., Festini, S. B., Yuen, E. K., & Friedman, L. M. (2022). Verbal Memory Interference in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Attention Disorders, 26(12), 1549–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547221085515

Ormrod, J. E. (2018). Human Learning (8th Editio). New York: Pearson.

Pelen, M. S., Artut, P. D., & Seventh, P. D. (2016). Seventh Grade Students’ Problem Solving Success Rates on Proportional Reasoning Problems. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1), 30–34.

Raharjanti, M., Nusantara, T., & Mulyati, S. (2016). Kecermatan Siswa Mengamati Kata Kunci Pada Soal Cerita Materi Perbandingan Berbalik Nilai. Jurnal Pendidikan - Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(3), 428–433. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i3.6169

Santrock, J. W. (2018). Educational Psychologi (6th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Solso, R. L., Maclin, O. H., & Maclin, M. K. (2014). Cognitive Psychology (8th Ed). USA: Pearson Education.

Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2020). Cognitive Psychology. Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2010 (6th Ed). USA : Wadsworth, Cangage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10547-16

Subanji. (2015). Teori Kesalahan Kontruksi Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang (UM Press).

Sukoriyanto, S., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., & Chandra, T. D. (2016). Students Thinking Process in Solving Combination Problems Considered from Assimilation and Accommodation Framework. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(16), 1494–1499. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.2811

Utari, R. S., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2015). Supporting 7th Students’ Propostional Reasoning Using Palembang Culture as Context and Ratio Table as Model. Development Research International Conference, 344–352.

Verawati, A., Agustito, D., Pusporini, W., Utami, W. B., & Widodo, S. A. (2022). Designing Android learning media to improve problem-solving skills of ratio. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2022.01.005

Wright, P., Fejzo, A., & Carvalho, T. (2022). Progressive pedagogies made visible: Implications for equitable mathematics teaching. The Curriculum Journal, 33(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.122




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v14i2.6377

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.