LITERASI NUMERASI SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH SEGIEMPAT DAN TRAPESIUM

Julia Rahmah Ratnasari(1), Yayan Eryk Setiawan(2*),

(1) SMP Assa'idiyyah Kepanjen
(2) Universitas Islam Malang
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengeksplorasi kemampuan literasi numerasi siswa pada pemecahan masalah luas segiempat dan trapesium. Siswa kelas VII disalah satu sekolah menengah pertama di Kabupaten Malang merupakan subjek dari penelitian ini. Kualitatif deskriptif digunakan sebagai metode penelitian. Jenis data yang dikumpulkan sesuai dengan hasil tes matematika pada pertanyaan pemecahan masalah luas segiempat dan trapesium. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan meliputi tes, analisis dokumen, dan wawancara. Thematic analysis digunakan sebagai teknik analisis data, sedangkan triangulasi, member checking, dan refleksivitas digunakan sebagai validitas data. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan literasi numerasi siswa pada soal pemecahan luas segiempat dan trapesium, yaitu siswa dapat memiliki kemampuan dalam memecahkan masalah umum terkait luas dalam kehidupan sehari-hari; siswa dapat menganalisis informasi yang diperoleh dari pertanyaan dan kemudian melakukan interpretasi analitik untuk membuat prediksi dan menarik kesimpulan. Kesulitan yang mereka temui adalah kesulitan dalam memahami pertanyaan; kurangnya pemahaman siswa terhadap materi prasyarat; kesulitan dalam merumuskan strategi penyelesaian yang lengkap; dan kesulitan dalam menarik kesimpulan

The purpose of this study is to explore students' numeracy literacy skills in solving quadrilateral and trapezoidal broad problems. Grade VII students in one of the junior high schools in Malang Regency were the subjects of this study. Descriptive qualitative is used as a research method. The type of data collected corresponds to the results of mathematical tests on square and trapezoidal area problem-solving questions. Data collection techniques used include tests, document analysis, and interviews. Thematic analysis is used as a data analysis technique, while triangulation, member checking, and reflexivity are used as data validity. The results of this study show that students' numeracy literacy ability on quadrilateral and trapezoidal broad solving problems, namely that students can have the ability to solve common problems related to area in everyday life; students can analyze the information obtained from the questions and then perform analytical interpretations to make predictions and draw conclusions. The difficulty they encountered was difficulty in understanding the question; lack of student understanding of the prerequisite material; difficulties in formulating a complete settlement strategy; and difficulty in drawing conclusions.


Keywords


literasi; numerasi; pemecahan masalah

References


Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ASS.V11N21P133

Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., & Yunansah, H. (2017). Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Adu, E., Assuah, C. K., & Asiedu-Addo, S. K. (2015). Students’ errors in solving linear equation word problems: Case study of a Ghanaian senior high school. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 11(0), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v11i0.

Apriliawan, A., Gembong, S., & Sanusi, S. (2013). ANALISIS KESALAHAN PENYELESAIAN SOAL URAIAN MATEMATIKA SISWA MTs PADA POKOK BAHASAN UNSUR-UNSUR LINGKARAN. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.25273/JIPM.V1I2.480

As’ari, A. R., Kurniati, D., & Subanji. (2019). Teachers expectation of students’ thinking processes in written works: A survey of teachers’ readiness in making thinking visible. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7978.409-424

Beda, Z., Smith, S. M., & Orr, J. (2020). Creativity on demand – Hacking into creative problem solving. NeuroImage, 216, 116867. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2020.116867

Craig, J., & Guzmán, L. (2018). Six Propositions of a Social Theory of Numeracy: Interpreting an Influential Theory of Literacy. Numeracy, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.11.2.2

Haryanti, M. D., Herman, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2019). Analysis of students’ error in solving mathematical word problems in geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042084

Herborn, K., Stadler, M., Mustafić, M., & Greiff, S. (2020). The assessment of collaborative problem solving in PISA 2015: Can computer agents replace humans? Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 105624. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2018.07.035

Holmes, W., & Dowker, A. (2013). Catch Up Numeracy: a targeted intervention for children who are low-attaining in mathematics. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/14794802.2013.803779, 15(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.803779

İncikabı, L., Ayanoğlu, P., & Uysal, R. (2020). Sixth-grade students’ procedural and conceptual understandings of division operation in a real-life context. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020.171

Kemendikbud. (2017). Materi pendukung literasi numerasi. Jakarta: Tim GLN Kemendikbud.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Nasional. (Online). Http://Gln.Kemdikbud.Go.Id.

Khalo, X., & Bayaga, A. (2015). nalysis of errors due to deficient mastery of prerequisite skills, facts andconcepts: A case of financial mathematics . The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 10, 98–113.

Mahmud, M. R., & Pratiwi, I. M. (2019). LITERASI NUMERASI SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH TIDAK TERSTRUKTUR. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.VOL4NO1.2019PP69-88

OECD. (2018). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) Result from PISA 2018. Www.Oecd.Org.Edu/Pisa.

Oktaviana, D., Kunci, K., Kesalahan, A., Kesalahan Newman, K., & Diskrit, M. (2017). ANALISIS TIPE KESALAHAN BERDASARKAN TEORI NEWMAN DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA PADA MATA KULIAH MATEMATIKA DISKRIT. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematika, 5(2), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.23971/EDS.V5I2.719

PISA. (2013). Assesment and analytical framework: mathematics, raeding, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publisher, 65–76.

Polya. (1957). How To Solve It. http://math.hawaii.edu/home/pdf/putnam/PolyaHowToSolveIt.pdf

Pusmenjar. (2020, September 15). Indonesia National Assessment Programme. Retrieved From Pusmenjar Kemendikbud Indonesia. Retrieved From Pusmenjar Kemendikbud Indonesia. Protection Agency website. Https://Pusmenjar.Kemdikbud.Go.Id/Inap-Sd/.

Putra, H. D., Thahiram, N. F., Ganiati, M., & Nuryana, D. (2018). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Bangun Ruang. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.25273/JIPM.V6I2.2007

Schoevers, E. M., Leseman, P. P. M., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2020). Enriching Mathematics Education with Visual Arts: Effects on Elementary School Students’ Ability in Geometry and Visual Arts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1613–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-019-10018-Z/TABLES/9

Widodo, S. A., & Sujadi, A. A. (2015). ANALISIS KESALAHAN MAHASISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH TRIGONOMETRI. SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.30738/SOSIO.V1I1.518

Xin, Y. P., Park, J. Y., Tzur, R., & Si, L. (2020). The impact of a conceptual model-based mathematics computer tutor on multiplicative reasoning and problem-solving of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATHB.2020.100762




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i3.5714

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.