ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIS DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL AKM DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

Nadia Octavia Trisnaningtyas(1), Rita Pramujiyanti Khotimah(2*),

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Based on the results of PISA 2018, mathematical literacy in Indonesia is low. Mathematical literacy skills are important for every student. One of the government's ways to improve mathematical literacy is with the National Assessment, which includes literacy and numeracy AKM. While each student has a different way of learning. Based on these problems, see the extent to which students' mathematical literacy skills in solving AKM questions with differences in student learning styles. This study expects to depict understudies' mathematical literacy skills in settling AKM type inquiries regarding learning styles. The technique utilized in this research is qualitative. The examination subjects comprosed of 3 students understudies of class X MIPA 4 SMAN 3 Taruna Angkasa with the classes of visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. The instruments utilized in the review were a learning style poll, a mathematical literacy test and an interview. That’s what the outcomes showed: 1) subjects with visual learning styles met the sign of communication, mathematics, picking strategies, utilizing task and image language, formal language and specialized language; 2) subjects with auditory learning styles have met the marks of communication, math, picking techniques, utilization of activities and image language, formal language and specialized language and endlessly thinking; 3) subjects with kinesthetic learning styles just satisfy the marks of communication, math and picking stechniques.


Keywords


mathematical literacy; learning style; AKM

References


Azizah, Ummu Nur, Agusriyanti Puspitorini, and Siti Zakiyah. 2019. “Profil Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar.” JIPM 1(1):11–17.

Edimuslim, E., Sofia Edriati, and Ainil Mardiyah. 2019. “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa SMA.” Suska Journal of Mathematics Education 5(2):95–110. doi: 10.24014/SJME.V5I2.8055.

Fathani, Abdul Halim. 2016. “Gaya Belajar Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematik Ditinjau Dari Tingkat Kecenderungan Kecerdasan Matematik Dan Linguistik.” Prosiding Seminar Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika.

Hamidah, Allinda. 2018. “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar.” CENDEKIA 10(02):157–62. doi: 10.37850/CENDEKIA.V10I02.70.

Hanggara, Yudhi, and Rio Mardani Suhardi. 2016. “Eksperimentasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Dan Pembelajaran Saintifik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 25 Batam Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016.” Jurnal Dimensi 5(3):1–13.

Imam, Fathul, Zaenuri Zaenuri, and Sunyoto Eko Nugroho. 2020. “Mathematical Literacy Ability in Learning Problem-Based Learning with Ethnomatic Mathematics Based on Student Learning Styles.” Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research 9(2):131–38.

Mahdiansyah, and Rahmawati. 2014. “Mathematical Literacy Of Students At Secondary Education Level:An Analysis Using International Test Design With Indonesian Context.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan (20):452–69.

Mamoh, Oktovianus, Dominika L. Taus, and Fitriani. 2021. “Analisis Kemampuan Matematika Siswa SMK Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Tiga Variabel Tipe HOT.” SIGMA 6:130–40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.36513/sigma.v6i2.958.

OECD. 2018. Information About The PISA Study 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. 2019. PISA 2018 : Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Rachmawati, Yemima Indah, Eko Sugandi, and Lydia Lia Prayitno. 2019. “Senior High School Students’ Ability in Posing System of Linear Equations in Two Variables Problems.” JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) 4(1):57–65. doi: 10.23917/JRAMATHEDU.V4I1.6954.

Rismen, Sefra, Widya Putri, and Lucky Heriyanti Jufri. 2022. “Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar.” Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 6(1):348–64. doi: 10.31004/CENDEKIA.V6I1.1093.

Ristek, Kemendikbud. 2019. “Merdeka Belajar.” Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi.

Rofiki, Imam, Ahmad Choirul Anam, Putri Eka Sari, Wahyu Henky Irawan, and Ika Santia. 2020. “Students’ Mental Construction in Cube and Cuboid Concepts Based on Mathematical Ability Differences.” Al-Jabar 11(1):134–44.

Rohim, Dhina Cahya, Septina Rahmawati, and Inggrid Dyah Ganestri. 2021. “Konsep Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Varidika 33(1):54–62.

Sakinah, M., and B. Avip P. 2021. “An Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Literacy Skills Assessed from Students’ Learning Style.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1882(1):012075. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012075.

Sutama. 2019. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, PTK, Mix Method, R&D. Sukoharjo: CV. Jasmine.

Syawahid, Muhammad, and Susilahudin Putrawangsa. 2017. “Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar.” Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika 10(2):222–40. doi: 10.20414/BETAJTM.V10I2.121.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.5662

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.