PENGEMBANGAN MODEL 4CM (COOL-COOPERATIVE -CRITICAL- CREATIVE-MEANINGFUL) LEARNING DALAM BLENDED LEARNING

Ratni Purwasih(1*), Eva Dwi Minarti(2),

(1) IKIP SILIWANGI
(2) IKIP SILIWANGI
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


This study aims to develop a 3CM learning model in blended learning. The method used in this research is R&D with the Plomp model. The Plomp model consists of preliminary research (preliminary research; 2) the design phase; 3) realization/construction phase; 4) test, evaluation and revision phases; and 5) implementation phase. The data collection technique uses a validation sheet to measure the feasibility of the 3CM learning model in blended learning. conducted by 3 experts and a practical sheet to measure the practicality of the 4CM learning model in blended learning conducted by 3 teacher practitioners. The results of the study are that the 3CM learning model developed has met the valid criteria, is very practical and effective. The implication of this research is that the 4CM learning model developed can be used by teachers on blended learning prism material

Keywords


Blended learning, Model 3CM Learning

References


Azer, S. A. (2009). Interactions between students and tutor in problem-based learning: The significance of deep learning. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 25(5), 240–249.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70068-3

Boelens, H., & La Heij, W. (2017). The development of semantic blocking in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12178

Cartier, P., Dhombres, J., Heinzmann, G., & Villani, C. (2016). Mathematics and Reality. Freedom in Mathematics, 1–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2788-5

Din, N., Haron, S., Ahmad, H., & Rashid, R. M. (2015). Technology Supported Cities and Effective Online Interaction for Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.030

Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., Bendegem, J. P. van, Bicudo, M., Miarka, R., & Moeller, L. K. R. (2016). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. In ICME-13 Topical Surveys. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-40569-8

Fitrianna, A. Y., Priatna, N., & Dahlan, J. A. (2021). Pengembangan Model E-Book Interaktif Berbasis Pembelajaran Induktif untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Penalaran Aljabar Siswa SMP. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan …, 05(02), 1562–1577. https://j-cup.org/index.php/cendekia/article/view/653

Hersh, R. (1997). What Is Mathematics, Really? In London: Jonathan Cape.

Huber, G. L., & Huber, A. A. (2008). Structuring Group Interaction to Promote Thinking and Learning During Small Group Learning in High School Settings. The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom, 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_6

Jamil, M. M. (2019). Optimalisasi Model ARCS Dalam Pembelajaran Saintifik Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Peminatan Mata Pelajaran Geografi Di Kelas Matematika Ilmu Alam. IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v1i1.1401

Liu, J., & Wang, L. (2010). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Computational thinking in discrete mathematics. 2nd International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, ETCS 2010, 1(61572419), 413–416. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCS.2010.200

Mahendra, I. W. E. (2017). Project Based Learning Bermuatan Etnomatematika Dalam Pembelajar Matematika. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 6(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i1.9257

Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.003

Nuryani, D. (2019). Efektifitas Media Smart Land Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Sekolah Dasar. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 7(2), 79–84.

https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPGSD/article/view/17479

Nyeneng, 1 Dewa Putu, Suana, W., & Maulina, H. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Flipped Classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Muhamadiyah Metro, 6(2), 159–174.

Purwaningrum, J. P. (2016). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Melalui Discovery Learning Berbasis Scientific Approach. Refleksi Edukatika, 6(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v6i2.613

Purwasih, R. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Di Tinjau Dari Adversity Quotient Tipe Climber. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 323. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i2.2118

Rochmad. (2012). Desain Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 3(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v3i1.2613

Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047

Sari, M., Habibi, M., & Putri, R. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think-Pairs-Share Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis dan Pengembangan Karakter Siswa SMA Kota Sungai Penuh. Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v1i1.221

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The Nature of Creativity Robert. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801

Surya, E., Sabandar, J., Kusumah, Y. S., & Darhim. (2013). Improving of junior high school visual thinking representation ability in mathematical problem solving by CTL. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 113–126.

https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.568.113-126

Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2015). Mathematics Creativity in Elementary Teacher Training. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 10(July), 101–109.

Wahyudi. (2021). Berpikir Kreatif dan Skemata Berpikir sesuai Gaya Belajar. Griya Media.

Wahyudi, W., Nuryani, D., & Setiawan, Y. (2022). Pengembangan Media Smart Land Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dalam Penerapan 3CM Learning Untuk Peserta didik Sekolah Dasar. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 12(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2022.v12.i1.p20-30

Wahyudi, W., Waluya, B., Suyitno, H., & Isnarto, I. (2019). The Use Of 3CM (Cool-Critical-Creative-Meaningful) Model In Blended Learning To Improve Creative Thinking Ability In Solving Mathematics Problem. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 5(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v5i1.7852

Wahyudi, W., Waluya, S. B., Suyitno, H., & Isnarto, I. (2020). The impact of 3CM model within blended learning to enhance students’ creative thinking ability. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.588

Wahyudi, W., Waluya, S. B., Suyitno, H., & Isnarto, I. (2021). Schemata and creative thinking ability in cool-critical-creative-meaningful (3CM) learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2019-0198

Zakiy, M. A. Z., Muhammad, S., & Farida. (2018). Pengembangan Media Android dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. TRIPLE S:Jourals of Mathematics Education, 1(2), 87–96.

Zhao, X., & Zhu, L. (2012). Schema theory and college English reading teaching. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p111




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i3.5262

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.