MATHEMATICAL RESILIENCE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY WITH RASCH MODEL AND SPSS IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Ayu Faradillah(1*), Citra Septiana(2),

(1) Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA University
(2) 
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Validity and reliability testing is very important for an instrument, both of which can determine whether the instrument used is good or not. This study intends to break down the correlation of the the mathematical resilience questionnaire for for studies utilizing SPSS and the Rasch Model. The research method used is a quantitative survey method, with a total of 207 students in one of the senior high schools in Jakarta. This study uses a mathematical resilience questionnaire which was adopted from other studies in which there are 4 indicators in the questionnaire. Testing the validity of the mathematical resilience questionnaire using the Rasch Model with the WinSteps 3.73 application showed that there were three invalid items (I9, I16, I18), and six items (I7, I11, I12, I13, I17, I19) which only met 1 condition. , so 26 must be retained because the item is satisfied. While the validity test on SPSS 24.0 which is seen from the Pearson correlation value, the results show that 6 items are invalid, namely (I7, I8, I9, I11, I16, I18), so the rest of the other items must be maintained because they meet the criteria. Meanwhile, the reliability calculation is (α = 0.84). The use of two different applications, namely Winsteps and SPSS, stated that the mathematical resilience questionnaire was declared valid and reliable. This is obtained by eliminating 8 statement items in the questionnaire.

Keywords


Mathematical Resilience; Rasch Model; Reliability; SPSS; Validity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi 2). Bumi Aksara. https://doi.org/10.1163/_q3_SIM_00374

Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why,when,and how? CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148

Cahyaningsih, U., Nahdi, D. S., Jatisunda, M. G., & Suciawati, V. (2021). Student’s Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability With Mathematical Resilience And Metacognition Skills: A Quantitative Analysis. 10(4), 2591–2601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4366

Darma, B. (2021). Statistika Penelitian Menggunakan Spss (Uji Validitas, Uji Reliabilitas, Regresi Linier Sederhana, Regresi Linier Berganda, Uji T, Uji F, R2) (p. 17). Guepedia.

Faradillah, A., & Adlina, S. (2021). Validity of critical thinking skills instrument on prospective Mathematics teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i2.40662

Faradillah, A., & Fadhilah, Y. H. R. (2021). Mathematical Problem-Solving on Slow Learners Based on Their Mathematical Resilience. Jurnal Elemen, 7(2), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i2.3321

Faradillah, A., & Febriani, L. (2021). Mathematical Trauma Students’ Junior High School Based on Grade and Gender. Infinity Journal, 10(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i1.p53-68

Faradillah, A., Hadi, W., & Tsurayya, A. (2018). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ reasoning ability in solving mathematical non-routine problem according to cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012006

Goodall, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2015). Overcoming Mathematical Helplessness and Developing Mathematical Resilience in Parents: An Illustrative Case Study. Creative Education. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.65052

Grimm, V., & Calabrese, J. M. (2011). What is resilience? A short introduction. Understanding Complex Systems, 2011, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20423-4_1

Hidayat, A. A. (2021). Menyusun Instrumen Penelitian & Uji Validitas-Reliabilitas (N. A. Aziz, Ed.). Health Books Publishing.

Himawan, M. A. D., Noer, S. H., & Sari, B. (2021). Deskripsi Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Ditinjau Dari Resiliensi Matematis Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas. 10(4), 2424–2435.

Janna, N. M. (2020). Konsep Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas dengan Menggunakan SPSS. Artikel : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Dakwah Wal-Irsyad (DDI) Kota Makassar, 18210047, 1–13.

Kooken, J., Welsh, M. E., McCoach, D. B., Johnston-Wilder, S., & Lee, C. (2016). Development and Validation of the Mathematical Resilience Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49(3), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175615596782

Lee, C., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2017). The Construct of Mathematical Resilience. In Understanding Emotions in Mathematical Thinking and Learning. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802218-4.00010-8

Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204(November 2014), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129

Muntazhimah, M. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis siswa Kelas 8 SMP. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(5), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v1i5.4551

Muntazhimah, M., Putri, S., & Khusna, H. (2020). Rasch Model untuk Memvalidasi Instrumen Resiliensi Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v6i1.8144

Nurmawati, & Suryani, I. (2018). Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Kecemasan Belajar Matematika Pada Siswa Madrasah Aliyah Swasta.

Osman, S. A., Khoiry, M. A., Rahman, N. A., Rahni, A. A. A., Mansor, M. R. A., Nordin, D., & Johar, S. (2016). The effectiveness of industrial training from the perspective of students of the civil and structure engineering department. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 11(Special Issue onpendidikankejuruteraandanalambina), 1–12.

Ramdani, R., Hanurawan, F., Ramli, M., Lasan, B. B., & Afdal, A. (2020). Development and Validation of Indonesian Academic Resilience Scale Using Rasch Models. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.1417A

Retnawati, H. (2017). Validitas dan reliabilitas konstruk skor tes kemampuan calon mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 23(2), 126–135.

Saidi, S. S., & Siew, N. M. (2019). Reliability and Validity Analysis of Statistical Reasoning Test Survey Instrument using the Rasch Measurement Model. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5755

Sugandi, A. I. (2017). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dan Resiliensi Matematis Siswa Smp Melalui Pendekatan Generatif. In Jurnal Perspektif Pendidikan.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (edisi revisi) (Issue November).

Sundayana, R. (2018). Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan (Edisi 4). Alfabeta. https://doi.org/10.1163/_q3_SIM_00374

Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100

Zanthy, L. S. (2018). Kontribusi Resiliensi Matematis Terhadap Kemampuan Akademik Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Statistika Matematika. 7, 85–94




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.5204

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.