PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN KAJIAN MATEMATIKA DASAR UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS MAHASISWA

Tri Andari(1*), Restu Lusiana(2),

(1) Universitas PGRI Madiun
(2) 
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran kajian matematika dasar yang valid, praktis, dan efektif serta meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematis mahasiswa. Penelitian ini menghasilkan produk berupa perangkat pembelajaran kajian matematika dasar yang terdiri dari RPS, bahan ajar, dan Tes hasil Belajar mahasiswa. Jenis penelitian menggunakan metode Research and Development yang mengacu pada model ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation dan Evaluation). Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan Matematika semester III Universitas PGRI Madiun tahun ajaran 2021/2022. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi wawancara, angket, dan tes. Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini diantaranya analisis data kevalidan, kepraktisan, dan keefektifan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran dinyatakan valid dengan hasil validasi RPS sebesar 82,85%; hasil validasi bahan ajar sebesar 83,44%; dan dan hasil validasi soal tes hasil belajar mahasiswa sebesar 83,33%. Perangkat pembelajaran telah memiliki kriteria praktis dengan presentase lembar angket respon mahasiswa sebesar 81,94%. Perangkat pembelajaran telah memiliki kriteria efektif dengan persentase ketuntasan adalah sebesar 82,62%. Hasil uji N-Gain diperoleh hasil 0.73 dalam kategori tinggi. Sehingga perangkat pembelajaran kajian matematika dasar memiliki kriteria valid, praktis, dan efektif serta dapat meningkatkan kemampuan representasi mahasiswa.

This study aims to produce valid, practical, and effective basic study learning and improve students' mathematical representation abilities. This research produces a product in the form of basic mathematics learning tools consisting of lesson plans, teaching materials, and student learning outcomes tests. This type of research uses the Research and Development method which refers to the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation). The subjects in this study were students of the third semester Mathematics Education study program at PGRI Madiun University for the 2021/2022 academic year. Data collection techniques include interviews, questionnaires, and tests. Data analysis techniques in this study include data analysis of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. The results showed that the learning tools were declared valid with the results of the RPS validation being 82.85%; the results of the validation of teaching materials are 83.44%; and the results of the validation of student learning outcomes test questions of 83.33%. Learning devices have practical criteria with a percentage of student response questionnaire sheets of 81.94%. Learning tools have effective criteria with the percentage of completeness is 82.62%. The results of the N-Gain test obtained results of 0.73 in the high category. So that the basic mathematics learning tools have valid, practical, and effective criteria and can improve students' representational abilities.


Keywords


Basic Mathematics Studies; Learning Media; Representation Ability

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Armadan, A., Somakim, S., & Indaryanti, I. (2017). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Teori Van Hiele di Materi Segiempat Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Indralaya Utara. Jurnal Elemen, 3(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v3i1.306

Dinia, S., Nurhafifah, A. Y., Mayasari, M., Patimah, S., & Hidayat, W. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Disposisi Matematis Siswa. Journal of Honai Math, 2(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v2i1.59

Halat, E., & Peker, M. (2011). The impacts of mathematical representations developed through webquest and spreadsheet activities on the motivation of pre-service elementary school teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 259–267.

Hatisaru, V. (2020). Exploring Evidence of Mathematical Tasks and Representations in the Drawings of Middle School Students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0609. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8482

Herdiman, I. (2017). Penerapan Pendekatan Open-Ended Untuk Meningkatkan Penalaran Matematik Siswa Smp. JES-MAT (Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika), 3(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.25134/jes-mat.v3i2.691

Hobri, H. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Pengembangan (Aplikasi Pada Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika). Jember: Pena Salsabila.

Lusiana, R., & Andari, T. (2017). The Development of Introduction for Basic Mathematics Based Structured Tasks Textbook to Improve the Ability of Logical Thinking. Icmeta, 1, 84–94.

Lusiana, R., Krisdiana, I., & Aisyah, S. (2018). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Kelas VII Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Kognitif. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 6(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v6i2.5354

Lusiana, R. L., & Andari, T. (2017). Developing an Algebra Textbook Based on Problem Solving to Improve Student’ Learning Achievement. Al-JAbar, 10(2), 293–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i2.4906

Minarni, A., & Napitupulu, E. E. (2017). Developing Instruction Materials Based on Joyful PBL to Improve Students Mathematical Representation Ability. International Education Studies, 10(9), 23. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n9p23

Mundy, J. F. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics: A guide for mathematicians. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 47(8), 868–876.

Purnamasari, V., & Nur Wangid, M. (2016). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Scientific Approach Untuk Membangun Karakter Kepedulian Dan Kedisiplinan. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 6(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v6i2.12047

Purwadi, I. M. A., Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Suparta, I. N. (2019). The effect of concrete-pictorial-abstract strategy toward students’ mathematical conceptual understanding and mathematical representation on fractions. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12171a

Rahmad, B. A., Ipung, Y., Abdur, R. A., Sisworo, & Dwi, R. (2016). Mathematical representation by students in building relational understanding on concepts of area and perimeter of rectangle. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(21), 2002–2008. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.2813

Riyadi, S., & Pardjono, P. (2014). Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Komputer Untuk Kelas Viii Smp. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.21831/tp.v1i2.2527

Ruseffendi, E. T. (2006). Pengantar kepada membantu guru mengembangkan kompetensinya dalam pengajaran matematika untuk meningkatkan CBSA (edisi revisi). bandung: Tarsito.

Sabirin, M. (2014). Representasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.18592/jpm.v1i2.49

Santia, I. (2015). Representasi Siswa Sma Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 3(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v3i2.505

Santia, I., Purwanto, Sutawidjadja, A., Sudirman, & Subanji. (2019). Exploring mathematical representations in solving ill-structured problems: The case of quadratic function. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7600.365-378

Sari, D. P., & Darhim. (2020). Implementation of react strategy to develop mathematical representation, reasoning, and disposition ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.7806.145-156

Sari, D. P., Darhim, & Rosjanuardi, R. (2018). Errors of students learning with react strategy in solving the problems of mathematical representation ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.4378.121-128

Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., & Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering the skills of critical thinking and question-posing in a project-based learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.001

Suhartono. (2017). Adversity Quotient Mahasiswa Pemograman Skripsi (Adeversity Quotinet of Student Programming Thesis). Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 209–220.

Supandi, S., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, R., Suyitno, H., & Dewi, K. (2018). Think-talk-write model for improving students’ abilities in mathematical representation. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1136a

Suryana, Y. (2015). Metode penelitian. bandung: Bandung : CV Pustaka Setia.

Turel, Y. K., & Ozer Sanal, S. (2018). The effects of an ARCS based e-book on student’s achievement, motivation and anxiety. Computers and Education, 127(June 2017), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.006




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4809

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.