ANALISIS LITERASI MATEMATIS KEISLAMAN MAHASISWA TADRIS MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN KEIRSEY

Zuraidah Zuraidah(1*),

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


This study aims to determine the relationship between Islamic mathematical literacy level and Keirsey personality type (Artisan, Idealist, Guardian, and Rational) in prospective mathematics teacher students, Teacher Training Faculty of IAIN Kediri. In addition, this study also aims to describe the Islamic mathematical literacy ability of prospective mathematics teacher students at the Teacher Training Faculty of IAIN Kediri, in terms of Keirsey's personality type. This research design uses a mixed-methods approach. In the quantitative approach, the type of research is correlational with a total sample of 151 students. While in the qualitative approach, the respondents used were 4 students who represented each Keirsey personality type. Sampling technique in the form of purposive sampling. There is no relationship between the level of mathematical literacy with Keirsey's personality type in prospective mathematics teacher students at the Teacher Training Faculty of IAIN Kediri. The correlation between personality type and the level of Islamic mathematical literacy of prospective mathematics teachers at IAIN Kediri was obtained with a significance of 0.22986. This means that the strength of the relationship between the two variables is included in the weak category. In the process of formulating context mathematically, there is no difference between research subjects in all personality types. All subjects can formulate context, understand, and translate problems into mathematical language or appropriate representations. In the process of using concepts, facts, procedures, and reasoning, the findings show that subjects with rational personality types are able to determine strategically in the use of mathematical concepts and are successful compared to other personality types. In the process of interpreting, applying, and evaluating the results, the findings show that subjects with rational and idealistic personality types can check the reasonableness of the solution. Meanwhile, in the artisan and guardian types, the contrary happens.


Keywords


Mathematical Literacy; Student Personality; Islamic Mathematics

References


Afifah, A., Khoiri, M., & Qomaria, N. (2019). Mathematics Preservice Teachers’ Views on Mathematical Literacy. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(3).

Agustin, M. D. A. (2019). Proses Berfikir Matematis Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey. Madrosatuna: Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 2(2), 29–38.

Arslan, C., & Yavuz, G. (2012). A study on mathematical literacy self-efficacy beliefs of prospective teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5622–5625.

Aryanto, E. W., Suharto, S., Setiawan, T. B., Hobri, H., & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Menurut David Keirsey. KadikmA, 9(2), 185–193.

Baumgartner, W. L. (2016). The development of a strategy for mathematical literacy learners for selected undergraduate studies [PhD Thesis]. University of Johannesburg.

Botha, H., & Van Putten, S. (2018). How mathematical literacy teachers facilitate mathematisation in modelling situations. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(1), 93–102.

Colwell, J., & Enderson, M. C. (2016). “When I hear literacy”: Using pre-service teachers’ perceptions of mathematical literacy to inform program changes in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 63–74.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version–Access Card Package. Pearson Education, Inc.

Dewi, H. L., & Widyastuti, A. (2020). Matematika Islam? Studi Kasus Pengaruh Matakuliah Matematika Islam Terhadap Sikap Matematis Mahasiswa Tadris Matematika Iain Pekalongan. Delta: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 61–70.

Dores, O. J., & Setiawan, B. (2019). Meningkatkan Literasi Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Membelajarkan Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 4(1), 42–46.

Faulkner, F., Hannigan, A., & Fitzmaurice, O. (2014). The role of prior mathematical experience in predicting mathematics performance in higher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 648–667.

Fithriyah, A. I. (2018). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran Matematika berbasis warisan budaya Indonesia untuk melatihkan literasi matematis siswa [PhD Thesis]. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Hamidah, K., & Suherman, S. (2016). Proses Berpikir Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika di tinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 231–248.

Hidayati, V. R., Wulandari, N. P., Maulyda, M. A., Erfan, M., & Rosyidah, A. N. K. (2020). Literasi Matematika Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Pisa Konten Shape And Space. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 3(3).

Idris, K. (2020). Literasi Statistik Berbasis Konteks Budaya dan Keislaman: Perspektif Dosen dan Mahasiswa PTKI. Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika Dan Nilai-Nilai Islami), 3(1), 357–362.

Irianto, P. O., & Febrianti, L. Y. (2017). Pentingnya penguasaan literasi bagi generasi muda dalam menghadapi MEA. Proceedings Education and Language International Conference, 1(1).

Jumarniati, J., Pasandaran, R. F., & Riady, A. (2016). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Turunan Fungsi Trigonometri. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2).

Juniarso, T. (2020). Literasi Matematika Mahasiswa Dengan Gaya Belajar Visual. Malih Peddas (Majalah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar), 9(2), 100–109.

Jupri, A., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2020). An Investigation of Master Student Understanding on Mathematical Literacy Problems. Jurnal Gantang, 5(1), 1–7.

Kabael, T. (2012). Graduate student middle school mathematics teachers’ communication abilities in the language of mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 809–815.

Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding mathematical literacy: The contribution of research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 101–116.

Koh, K., & Chapman, O. (2019). Problem-based learning, assessment literacy, mathematics knowledge, and competencies in teacher education. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, 3, 74–80.

Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218–231.

Lestari, N. D. S., Juniati, D., & St, S. (2017). Preliminary Study: Mathematics’ Teacher Conception in Suporting the Integration of Mathematics’ Literacy and Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Proceeding ICMETA, 1(1).

Melya, L., & Supriadi, N. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Guardian dan Idealist. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(3), 337–345.

Mevarech, Z. R., & Fan, L. (2018). Cognition, Metacognition, and Mathematics Literacy. In Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education (pp. 261–278). Springer.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Novak, E., & Tassell, J. L. (2017). Studying preservice teacher math anxiety and mathematics performance in geometry, word, and non-word problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 20–29.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/b25efab8-en

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.

Oktaviyanthi, R., Agus, R. N., & Supriani, Y. (2017). Pisa Mathematics Framework dalam Penelusuran Mathematical Literacy Skills Mahasiswa.

Oktiningrum, W. (2016). Developing PISA-" Like" Mathematics Task with Indonesia Natural and Cultural Heritage as Context to Assess Students Mathematical Literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1–10.

Önal, H., Yorulmaz, A., Gökbulut, Y., & Altiner, E. Ç. (2017). The Relationshıp Between Pre-Service Class Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Mathematical Literacy and Their Attitudes towards Mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(26), 170–179.

Panjaitan, B. (2016). Karakteristik Metakognisi Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah matematika Berdasarkan Tipe Kepribadian. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 21(1).

Prabawati, M. N. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematik Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 113–120.

Prasetyo, A., Dwidayati, N. K., & Junaedi, I. (2017). Students’s Mathematical Connection Ability and Disposition Reviewed by Keirsey Personality Type through Eliciting Activities Mathematics Learning Model. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v6i2.14301

Rafianti, I., Setiani, Y., & Novaliyosi, N. (2018). Profil kemampuan literasi kuantitatif calon guru matematika. JPPM (Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 11(1).

Ramalisa, Y. (2013). Proses berpikir kritis siswa SMA tipe kepribadian thinking dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(01).

Rathburn, M. K. (2015). Building connections through contextualized learning in an undergraduate course on scientific and mathematical literacy. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), n1.

Riana, D. D., & Zenizela, Z. (2020). Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar. Konstruktivisme: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 12(1), 39–48.

Sari, R. H. Y. (2017). Apakah Integrasi Islam dapat Membudayakan Literasi Matematika?

Sayang, A., Laurens, T., & Palinussa, A. L. (2019). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian. JUMADIKA: Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 71–80.

Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). The evolution and key concepts of the PISA mathematics frameworks. In Assessing mathematical literacy (pp. 5–33). Springer.

Sunarto, M. D., Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2017). Profil proses berpikir mahasiswa tipe kepribadian sensing dalam pemecahan masalah logika matematika. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 2, 95007.

Umbara, U., & Suryadi, D. (2019). Re-Interpretation of Mathematical Literacy Based on the Teacher’s Perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4).

Vila, F., & Sanz, A. (2013). Mathematical literacy in Plant Physiology undergraduates: Results of interventions aimed at improving students’ performance. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(6), 893–904.

Wardono, W., & Kurniasih, A. W. (2015). Peningkatan Literasi Matematika Mahasiswa Melalui Pembelajaran Inovatif Realistik E-Learning Edmodo Bermuatan Karakter Cerdas Kreatif Mandiri. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(1), 95–102.

Wulan, E. R., & Anggarini, R. E. (2019). Gaya Kognitif Field-Dependent Dan Field-Independent Sebagai Jendela Profil Pemecahan Masalah Polya Dari Siswa SMP. Factor M, 1(2).

Yavuz, G., & Erbay, H. N. (2015). The analysis of pre-service teachers’ beliefs about mathematical problem solving. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2687–2692.

Yuwono, A. (2010). Profil siswa SMA dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian [PhD Thesis]. UNS (Sebelas Maret University).

Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2016). Developing Pisa-Like Mathematics Task With Indonesia Natural And Cultural Heritage As Context To Assess Students Mathematical Literacy. Journal on MATHEMATICS Education, 7(1), 1–8.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4627

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.