STUDENTS' LEARNING OBSTACLES IN SOCIAL ARITHMETIC

Nisa Azzahra(1*), Tatang Herman(2),

(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Social arithmetic is one of the essential subjects for 7th-grade students because it is related to everyday life. However, the facts show that many students still have learning problems about the application of social arithmetic. The obstacle experienced by students is due to the students' obstacle in learning social arithmetic. This study aimed to obtain previous research on junior high school students' learning obstacles on social arithmetic. This study method is a systematic literature review (SLR), a descriptive-based survey in the form of an analysis of 23 articles from the Google Scholar database, with the keywords learning obstacle, analysis error, and difficulties in social arithmetic. The results showed that three types of learning obstacles, namely didactical obstacles, ontogenic obstacles, and epistemological obstacles. In addition, obstacles occur in concepts (profit, loss, discount), procedures (modeling and concluding), operational techniques (multiplication of percentage and division), and textbooks used because of the language that is difficult to understand and does not fit the context recognized by students. The research implies providing information on the obstacles experienced by students and research gaps from the results of this review for future research, namely research on analyzing textbooks.


Keywords


Learning obstacle; social arithmetic; systematic literature review (SLR); textbooks

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ain, N., & Kurniawati, M. (2012). Implementasi Kurikulum KTSP: Pembelajaran Tematik Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang, 3(2), 316–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21067/jip.v3i2.373

Allen, G. . (2007). Student Thinking (Lesson 1 : Misconceptions in mathematics) (pp. 1–12). College Station.

Amalia, L. (2017). Desain Didaktis Aritmetika Sosial Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa SMP. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Ana, E. N., & Nusantara, T. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aritmatika Sosial Analysis of Student Difficulties in Solving Problems of Social Arithmetic. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 7(1), 1–4.

Antonijević, R. (2016). Cognitive activities in solving mathematical tasks: The role of a cognitive obstacle. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2503–2515. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1306a

Ardiansyah, A. S., Ferianto, A. N., & Dinasari, A. (2018). Readability test for basic mathematics textbook integrated challenge based on blended learning to develop skills in the industrial revolution era. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(1), 910–916. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v10i1.44322

Asih, K. S., Rosita, C. D., & Tonah. (2018). Analisis Learning Obstacles Pada Pokok Bahasan Aplikasi Turunan Pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA. Prosiding SNMPM II, 211–221.

Barwell, R. (2005). Working on arithmetic word problems when English is an additional language. British Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 329–348.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500082177

Bayaga, A., Khalo, X., & Moyo, G. (2021). Fundamental influences related to language-based difficulties in financial mathematics. South African Journal of Higher Education, 35(3), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.20853/35-3-3537

Bela, M. E., Wewe, M., & Lengi, S. (2021). Pengembangan Modul Matematika Materi Aritmatika Sosial Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik Untuk Siswa Kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 05(01), 391–400.

Bernardo, A. B. I. (1999). Overcoming obstacles to understanding and solving word problems in mathematics. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 19(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341990190203

Bosch, M., Hausberger, T., Hochmuth, R., Winsløw, C., Bosch, M., Hausberger, T., Hochmuth, R., Winsløw, C., & Didactic, E. (2021). External Didactic Transposition in Undergraduate Mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 9(1), 1–23.

Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Butler, A. (2013). Exploring the Role of Social Reasoning and Self-Efficacy in the Mathematics Problem-Solving Performance of Lower- and Higher-Income Children. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 3(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2013.03.1.07

Carrillo-yañez, J., Climent, N., Montes, M., Contreras, L. C., Escudero-ávila, D., Vasco, D., Rojas, N., Aguilar-gonzález, Á., Ribeiro, M., Muñoz-catalán, M. C., Climent, N., Montes, M., Contreras, L. C., Flores-medrano, E., Escudero-ávila, D., Vasco, D., Rojas, N., Flores, P., Aguilar-gonzález, Á., … Muñoz-catalán, M. C. (2018). Research in Mathematics Education The mathematics teacher ’ s specialised knowledge ( MTSK ) model. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1479981

Chanisah, Sugiatno, & Sayu, S. (2019). Hambatan belajar siswa berdasarkan penalaran analogi dalam materi aritmatika sosial di sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 8(6).

Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. Proceedings of the IV Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198248601.003.0007

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry & Reseach Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed). SAGE Publications.

Davies, P. (2011). Students’ conceptions of price, value and opportunity cost: some implications for future research. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 10(2–3), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.2304/csee.2011.10.2.101

Dong, A., Jong, M. S. Y., & King, R. B. (2020). How Does Prior Knowledge Influence Learning Engagement? The Mediating Roles of Cognitive Load and Help-Seeking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(October), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203

Ferdianto, R. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita pada Materi Aritmetika Sosial menurut Klasifikasi Kastolan. Skripsi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Gafoor, K. A., & Kurukkan, A. (2015). Why High School Students Feel Mathematics Difficult? An Exploration of Affective Beliefs. UGC Sponsored National Seminar on Pedagogy of Teacher Education Trends and Challenges, August, 1–6.

Gaukroger, S. (2016). Social Arithmetic. In The Natural and the Human: Science and the Shaping of Modernity (pp. 267–302). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof

Gene, K., Zacharos, K., Lavidas, K., & Koustourakis, G. (2018). An Analysis of School Mathematics Textbooks in Terms of Their Pedagogical Orientation. Open Journal for Educational Research, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0201.01001g

Glasnovic Gracin, D. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: a five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1431849

Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the Society of the Future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6

Hadar, L. L. (2017). Opportunities to learn: Mathematics textbooks and students’ achievements. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.10.002

Hashmi, A., Hussain, T., & Shoaib, A. (2018). Alignment between Mathematics Curriculum and Textbook of Grade VIII in Punjab Alignment between Mathematics Curriculum and Textbook of Grade VIII in Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(1), 57–76.

Inayah, F. F. (2018). Penerapan teori situasi didaktik pada materi aritmatika sosial. KONTINU: Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika, 2(2), 35–47.

Intansari, R. (2019). Desain Didaktis Materi Aritmatika Sosial Pada Madrasah Tsanawiyah. PEDIAMATIKA: Journal of Mathematical Science and Mathematics Education, 01(02), 69–80.

Jäder, J., Lithner, J., & Sidenvall, J. (2020). Mathematical problem solving in textbooks from twelve countries. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1120–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1656826

Kajander, A., & Lovric, M. (2009). Mathematics textbooks and their potential role in supporting misconceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701691558

Karadeniz, M. H., & Karahan, A. (2020). BLACK FRIDAY DISCOUNTS: PERCENTAGE CALCULATION ACTIVITIES. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities (JIBA) / Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi (ATED), 10(2), 83–89.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 Tentang Buku Yang Digunakan Oleh Satuan Pendidikan. In Permendikbud.

Kemendikbud. (2019). Pedoman Program Kewirausahaan SMA.

Løhre, A., Vedul-Kjelsås, V., & Østerlie, O. (2021). Enjoyment as a learning resource: Stories told by students with harmful concentration problems. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Pedagogikk Og Kritikk, 7, 81. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v7.2663

Makonye, J. P., & Fakude, J. (2016). A Study of Errors and Misconceptions in the Learning of Addition and Subtraction of Directed Numbers in Grade 8. SAGE Open, 6(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016671375

Ningsih, W., Rohaeti, E. E., & Maya, R. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Mengerjakan Soal Aritmatika Sosial Berdasarkan Tahapan Newman. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 4(1), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i1.177-184

Nuraeni, R., Ardiansyah, S. G., & Zanthy, L. S. (2020). Permasalahan Matematika Aritmatika Sosial Dalam Bentuk Cerita: Bagaimana Deskripsi Kesalahan-Kesalahan Jawaban Siswa? Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 5(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v5i1.3345

Oates, T. (2014). Why textbooks count. In Cambridge Assessment (Issue November). http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/images/181744-why-textbooks-count-tim-oates.pdf

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Students and Money. In PISA: Vol. VI (Issue Volume VI). OECD. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/%5Cnjsessionid=1fwyo5fg5eknb.x-oecd-live-02content/book/9789264208094-en

OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018. In Country Note : Indonesia. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-iii_bd69f805-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org//sites/bd69f805-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/bd69f805-en#fig86

OECD. (2021). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In PISA. OECD. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090366

Pansell, A., & Boistrup, L. B. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ teaching practices in relation to textbooks: Exploring praxeologies. Mathematics Enthusiast, 15(3), 541–562.

Parawansa, F. A., & Siswanto, R. D. (2021). Hambatan Epistemologi Peserta Didik dalam Menyelesaikan Aritmatika Sosial Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar dan Perbedaan Gender. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 05(03), 2532–2547.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2012). 21st Century Student Outcomes. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework

Pusdatin Kemendikbud. (2020). Panduan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam BDR yang Memanfaatkan Rumah Belajar.

Puspendik. (2018). Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional. Kemendikbud. https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/#2018!smp!daya_serap!99&99&999!T&C&T&T&1&!1!&

Puspendik. (2019). Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional. Kemendikbud. https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/#2019!smp!daya_serap!30&01&999!T&03&T&T&1&unbk!1!&

Rangkuti, A. N., & Khairani, E. (2018). Pengembangan Learning Trajectory Pokok Bahasan Aritmatika Sosial dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual di MTsN 2 Padangsidimpuan. Logaritma, 06(01), 19–40.

Skovsmose, O. L. E. (2005). Foregrounds and Politics of Learning Obstacles. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(1), 4–10.

Sugandi, B., & Delice, A. (2014). Comparison of Turkish and Indonesian Secondary Mathematics Curricula; Reflection of the Paradigms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 540–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.240

Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical Design Research (DDR) dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 1, 3–12.

Utami, R. (2013). Penerapan permainan pasaran dalam pembelajaran matematika materi pokok aritmatika sosial. ΔELT∆, 1(2), 128–135.

Van Rinsveld, A., Schiltz, C., Brunner, M., Landerl, K., & Ugen, S. (2016). Solving arithmetic problems in first and second language: Does the language context matter? Learning and Instruction, 42, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.003

Wahyuni, A. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aritmatika Sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 67–76.

Weinberg, A., & Wiesner, E. (2011). Understanding mathematics textbooks through reader-oriented theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9264-3

Wheat, H. G. (1946). The Fallacy of Social Arithmetic. The Mathematics Teacher, 39(1), 27–34.

https://doi.org/10.5951/mt.39.1.0027

Wijayanti, D. (2019). Linking proportionality of arithmetic, algebra and geometry domains in Indonesian lower secondary textbooks. Educação Matemática Pesquisa : Revista Do Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados Em Educação Matemática, 21(4), 74–84.

https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2019v21i4p074-084

Wijayanti, D., & Winslow, C. (2017). Mathematical practice in textbooks analysis: Praxeological reference models, the case of proportion. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 6(3), 307. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2017.2078

Winata, R., Permata, J. I., & Friantini, R. N. (2020). The use of social arithmetic contextual modules on learning achievement in terms of interest in learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics EducationJournal of Mathematics, 9(2), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.

Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9

Yunia, N., & Zanthy, L. S. (2020). Kesalahan Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial. Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 5(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v5i1.3206




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i1.4621

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.