KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DAN KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN STEM BERBASIS LESSON STUDY FOR LEARNING COMMUNITY

Andini Dwi Rachmawati(1*), Yaya Sukjaya Kusumah(2), Dadang Juandi(3),

(1) 
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan kemandriain belajar dengan pendekatan STEM berbasis LSLC (Lesson Study for Learning Community). Subyek penelitian adalah enam  peserta didik kelas VII SMPN 1 Ngunut. Pemilihan subyek peserta didik berdasarkan angket kemandirain belajar. Penelitian ini tergolong penelitian kualitatif . Teknik pengumpulan data pada penelitian terdiri dari beberapa tahapan yaitu lembar observasi, angket kemandirian belajar, dan tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Analisis data yang diigunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu dengan pengumpulan data, penyajian data, dan verifikasi data. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa aktivitas belajar peserta didik mengalami peningkatan. setiap pertemuan. Perkembangan tersebut dapat ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dengan kemandirian belajar tinggi, mampu menyelesaikan masalah menggunakan empat tahap. Hanya tiga indikator yang dapat dicapai oleh peserta didik yang memiliki kemapuan pemecahan masalah matematika dengan kemandirian belajar sedang Sedangkan peserta didik dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dengan kemandirian belajar rendah hanya memenuhi satu indikator saja.

Kata kunci: Kemampuan pemecahan masalah; kemandiran belajaran; LSLC pendekatan STEM;

 

 

Abstract

This study aims to describe problem solving skills and independent learning with a STEM approach based on LSLC (Lesson Study for Learning Community). The research subjects were six seventh grade students of SMPN 1 Ngunut. The selection of students' subjects was based on a self-learning questionnaire. This research is classified as qualitative research . The data collection technique in the study consisted of several stages, namely observation sheets, learning independence questionnaires, and mathematical problem solving ability tests. Data analysis used in this study is data collection, data presentation, and data verification. The results of this study indicate that the learning activities of students have increased. every meeting. This development can be shown by problem solving skills with high learning independence, able to solve problems using four stages. Only three indicators can be achieved by students who have mathematical problem solving abilities with moderate learning independence. Meanwhile, students with mathematical problem solving abilities with low learning independence only meet one indicator.

Keywords: Problem solving ability, LSLC, learning independence, STEM approach

 


Keywords


Problem solving ability, learning independence, STEM approach, LSLC

References


Abdullah, N., Halim, L., & Zakaria, E. (2014). VStops : A Thinking Strategy and Visual Representation Approach in Mathematical Word Problem Solving toward Enhancing STEM Literacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1073a

Agustina, A., & Putri, R. I. I. (2020). Calculation of electric account as learning context based on project based learning (PBL) and lesson study for learning community (LSLC). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1).

Al-doulat, A. S. (2017). The impact of teaching using the STEM approach in acquisition of scientific concepts and developing scientific thinking among Classroom-Teacher students at the University of Jordan The impact of teaching using the STEM approach in acquisition of scientifi. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 14(7), 29–38.

Amin, I., & Mariani, S. (2017). PME Learning Model : The Conceptual Theoretical Study Of Metacognition Learning In Mathematics Problem Solving Based On Constructivism. IEJME, 12(4), 333–352.

Corlu, M. S., Capraro Prof., R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 74–85.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 0(0), 1–44.

Ekananda, A., Pujiastuti, H., & S, C. A. H. F. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar Siswa. WILANGAN: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(4), 367–382. http://www.jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/wilangan

Ekawati, N. W., Iswari, R. S., & Lisdiana. (2018). The influence of scientific independence towards students’ content analysis and science process skills on cell metabolism topic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 420–427.

Fatkhiyyah, I., Winarso, W., & Manfaat, B. (2019). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Belajar Menurut David Kolb. Jurnal Elemen, 5(2), 93.

Frey, B. B. (2018). STEM Education. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Departement Education and Skills.

Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54.

Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–18.

Hobri, Murtikusuma, R. P., Oktavianingtyas, E., Susanto, & Putri, I. W. S. (2021). The students’ interaction in mathematics collaborative learning, caring community, and jumping task. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1), 0–12.

Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons, 52(4), 375–398.

Idris, F., Hassan, Z., Ya’acob, A., Gill, S. K., & Awal, N. A. M. (2012). The Role of Education in Shaping Youth’s National Identity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 443–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.299

Kammisah Osman, & Rohaida Mohd Saat. (2014). Editorial . Science Technology , Engineering and Mathematics ( STEM ) education in Malaysia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 153–154.

Mateo Diaz, M., & Lee, C. (2020). What Technology Can and Can’t Do for Education: A Comparison of 5 Stories of Success. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://publications.iadb.org/en/what-technology-can-and-cant-do-for-education-a-comparison-of-5-stories-of-success

Munawaroh. (2017). The Influence of Teaching Methods and Learning Environment to the Student’s Learning Achievement of Craft and Entrepreneurship Subjects at Vocational High School. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(4), 665–678.

Murdiyani, N. M., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Van Eerde, D., & Van Galen, F. (2013). Developing a model to support students in solving subtraction. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 95–112.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematic. Copyright © 2000 by The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Park, W., Wu, J. Y., & Erduran, S. (2020). The Nature of STEM Disciplines in the Science Education Standards Documents from the USA, Korea and Taiwan: Focusing on Disciplinary Aims, Values and Practices. Science and Education, 29(4), 899–927.

Phuntsho, U., & Dema, Y. (2019). Examining the Effects of Using Polya’s Problem- solving Model on Mathematical Academic Achievement and Analyzing Ability of the Fourth Grade Students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 5(2), 1–8.

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.

Rach, S., & Ufer, S. (2020). Which Prior Mathematical Knowledge Is Necessary for Study Success in the University Study Entrance Phase? Results on a New Model of Knowledge Levels Based on a Reanalysis of Data from Existing Studies. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6(3), 375–403.

Razak, F., Sutrisno, A. B., & Kamaruddin, R. (2018). Deskripsi Pemecahan Masalah Matematika berdasarkan Langkah Polya ditinjau dari Kepribadian Siswa Tipe Melankolis. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(2), 86.

Saito, E., & Atencio, M. (2015). Lesson study for learning community (LSLC): conceptualising teachers’ practices within a social justice perspective. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(6), 795–807.

Sam, H. N., & Qohar, A. (2016). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berdasarkan Langkah - Langkah Polya untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 156.

Sari, E. N., & Zamroni, Z. (2019). The impact of independent learning on students’ accounting learning outcomes at vocational high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(2), 141–150.

Simamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Hasratuddin, H. (2018). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61–72.

Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., Maat, S. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2019). The Effect of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Program on Students’ Achievement in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5885

Tadlock, J., Assistant, G., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encouraging Self-Regulated Learning in the Classroom: A Review of the Literature Sharon Zumbrunn Assistant Professor Foundations of Education. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3358.6084

Tresnaningsih, F., Santi, D. P. D., & Suminarsih, E. (2019). Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Kelas Iii Sdn Karang Jalak I Dalam Pembelajaran Tematik. Pedagogi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 6(2), 51–59.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4416

Refbacks