ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN TPACK MAHASISWA CALON GURU PADA MATA KULIAH PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA SD

Fida Rahmantika Hadi(1*), Rissa Prima Kurniawati(2),

(1) Uiversitas PGRI Madiun
(2) Universitas PGRI Madiun
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendiskripsikan kemampuan TPaCK mahasiswa PGSD pada mata kuliah pembelajaran matematika SD. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dekriptif. Subjek penelitian adalah 28 mahasiswa semester 4 yang menempuh mata kuliah Pembelajaran Matematika SD yang kemudian dipilih tiga mahasiswa yaitu masing-masing satu mahasiswa berkemampuan tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan menggunakan observasi dan wawancara. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah reduksi data, penyajian data, penarikan kesimpulan, dan triangulasi. Triangulasi menggunakan metode teknik dengan membandingkan dari hasil observasi dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa kemampuan TPaCK ketiga mahasiswa sudah baik dengan memenuhi ketiga komponen dari TPaCK dengan presentase subjek pertama 78,3%, subjek kedua 86,7% dan subjek ketiga 83,3%. Jadi dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan TPaCK mahasiswa PGSD baik dengan memenuhi ketiga komponen yaitu Content Knowledge (CK), Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) dan Technology Knowledge (TK).

This study aims to describe the TPaCK ability of PGSD students in elementary mathematics learning courses. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The subjects of the research were 28 students from semester 4 who took the Elementary Mathematics Learning course which were then selected by three students from each group, namely students with high, medium, and low abilities. Data collection techniques using observation and interviews. Data analysis techniques used in this research are data reduction, data presentation, conclusion drawing, and triangulation. Triangulation uses a technique or method by analyzing the results of observations and interviews. The results of the study explained that the TPaCK ability of the three students was good by fulfilling the seven components of the TPaCK with the percentage of the first subject 78.3%, the second subject 86.7% and the third subject 83.3%.


Keywords


Pembelajaran Matematika, PGSD, TPaCK

References


Bower, M., Wood, L. N., Lai, J. W. M., Howe, C., & Lister, R. (2017). Improving the computational thinking pedagogical capabilities of school teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.4

CHO, Y., & Lee, Y. (2017). Possibility of improving computational thinking through activity based learning strategy for young children. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95.

Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Albion, P. (2010). Beyond Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The importance of TPACK for informing preservice teacher education in Australia. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 324, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15378-5_11

Fuada, Z., Soepriyanto, Y., & Susilaningsih, S. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Technological Content Knowledge (TCK) Pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 3(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v3i32020p251

Hadi, F. R., & Kurniawati, R. P. (2019). Analisis kemampuan tpack mahasiswa dalam menyusun perangkat pembelajaran sekolah dasar. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 85–94.

Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 312–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.002

Indriani, F., Hidayah, N., & Hidayah, Y. (2021). Pelatihan Pengembangan Subject Spesific Pedagogi Tematik Berbasis TPACK Bagi Guru SD Muhammadiyah di Wilayah Sleman Yogyakarta. Prima Abdika : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.37478/abdika.v1i2.979

Müller, J. M., Veile, J. W., & Voigt, K. I. (2020). Prerequisites and incentives for digital information sharing in Industry 4.0 – An international comparison across data types. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 148, 106733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106733

Mushthofaiyyah, F., Subekti, E. E., & Kuswandari. (2021). Jurnal Paedagogy : Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik Berbasis Media PPT untuk Meningkatkan Jurnal Paedagogy : melalui pendekatan saintifik pada tema 7 perkembangan teknologi di SD Negeri 1 Klepu Metode Penelitian berbagai kegiatan pembelajaran . Kemmis da. Jurnal Paedagogy: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 8(3), 386–391.

Nurfidah, N. (2021). Kemampuan Technologi Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (TPACK) Mahasiswa Calon Guru Pgsd Melalui Presentasi Di Kelas. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 5(4), 1412–1415. https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v5i4.2572/http

Rahayu, A. H. (2022). Analisis Tpack Mahasiswa Pgsd Unsap Sumedang. COLLASE (Creative of Learning Students Elementary Education), 5(1), 30–38.

Tanak, A. (2020). Designing tpack-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.012

Valtonen, T., Leppänen, U., Hyypiä, M., Sointu, E., Smits, A., & Tondeur, J. (2020). Fresh perspectives on TPACK: pre-service teachers’ own appraisal of their challenging and confident TPACK areas. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2823–2842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10092-4

Vu, T. L. A. (2018). Building CDIO approach training programmes against challenges of industrial revolution 4.0 for engineering and technology development. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 11(7), 1129–1148.

Yigit, M. (2014). A Review of the Literature: How Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Develop Their Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.96390




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i1.4320

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.