PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR KALKULUS INTEGRAL BERBASIS PENDEKATAN COMPUTATIONAL THINKING

Fariz Setyawan(1*), Dwi Astuti(2),

(1) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
(2) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Dampak pandemi memaksa mahasiswa lebih menyukai pembelajaran dengan menggunakan e-learning ataupun WhatsApp dibandingkan dengan platform lain. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut maka perlu dikembangkan bahan ajar yang terintegrasi dengan teknologi terkini yang bersifat adaptif dan dapat diakses kapanpun dan dimanapun oleh mahasiswa. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan bahan ajar mata kuliah Kalkulus Integral berbasis pendekatan Computational Thinking (CT) yang valid dan praktis. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan dengan model pengembangan Plomp yang meliputi tahap preliminary research, prototyping, dan assesment. Instrumen yang digunakan meliputi angket validitas ahli, angket respon mahasiswa terhadap e-modul, dan angket respon mahasiswa terhadap pembelajaran. Teknik analisis data menggunakan sistematik refleksi dan dokumentasi untuk menghasilkan teori atau prinsip desain secara ilmiah. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa bahan ajar sangat valid (Sr=4,76) dan praktis (Pr=3,79). Selain itu, melalui refleksi pembelajaran diperoleh sebanyak 73,3% mahasiswa memahami konsep yang diberikan, 46,7% mahasiswa mengaitkan pengetahuan mahasiswa sebelumnya, 40% mahasiswa setuju dosen melakukan pembimbingan saat mahasiswa menyelesaikan masalah, 53,3% mahasiswa mendapatkan kesempatan untuk berdiskusi dan menyampaikan pendapat, dan 40% mahasiswa setuju bahwa dosen memberikan kesempatan untuk mengevaluasi diri melalui tugas yang diberikan dalam e-learning. Saran untuk penelitian berikutnya adalah dapat melanjutkan penelitian eksperimen untuk mengukur pengaruh penggunaan bahan ajar yang telah dikembangkan.

The impact of the pandemic has forced students to prefer learning by using e-learning or WhatsApp compared to other platforms. This encourages researchers to provide teaching materials that are integrated with the latest technology that is adaptive and can be accessed anytime and anywhere by students. The purpose of this research is to develop a valid and practical teaching materials in Integral Calculus course based on Computational Thinking (CT) approach. The development model used is a research design model of the type of development studies by Plomp such as preliminary research, prototyping, and assesments. The instruments of the research are questionnaire of expert validity, students’ response of e-modul and learning process. The data analyzed by systematic reflection and documentation to produce scientific theories or principle. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the teaching material is compelling (Sr=4.76) and practical (Pr=3.79). Meanwhile, as measured through the reflection of CT-based learning was obtained by as many as 73.3% of students understood the concepts given, 46.7% of students linked previous student knowledge, 40% of students agree that lecturers provide guidance when students solve problems, 53.3% of students get the opportunity to discuss and convey their thoughts during lectures, and 40% of students agree that lecturers provide opportunities to evaluate themselves through assignments given in e-learning. Suggestions for future research are to continue experimental research in measuring the effect of using developed teaching materials.


Keywords


bahan ajar; kalkulus integral; valid; praktis

References


Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Adewumi, S., & Suhonen, J. (2019). A Systematic Review of Computational Thinking Approach for Programming Education in Higher Education Institutions. Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3364521

Akker, J. van den, Brenda, B., Anthony, E. K., Nienke, N., & Tjeerd, P. (2013). Educational Design Research (Part A). SLO, Netherlands institute for curriculum development. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_11

Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185

Bartle, R. G. (1996). Return to the Riemann Integral. The American Mathematical Monthly, 103(8), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1996.12004798

Domingo, M. G., & Garganté, A. B. (2016). Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers’ perception of mobile technology learning impacts and applications’ use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.023

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K–12. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051

Hanifah, H. (2021). Practicality test of student worksheet (SWS) based on: Action, Process, Object, Schema (APOS model) assisted on Geogebra the subject of Riemann sum. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1731(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012035

Jacinto, H., & Carreira, S. (2021). Digital Tools and Paper-And-Pencil In Solving-and-Expressing: How Technology Expands A Student’s Conceptual Model of A Covariation Problem. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.1.12940.113-132

Nedaei, M., Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2021). Exploring undergraduate engineering students’ mathematical problem-posing: the case of integral-area relationships in integral calculus. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 24(2), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1858516

Pischetola, M., de Miranda, L. V. T., & Albuquerque, P. (2021). The invisible made visible through technologies’ agency: a sociomaterial inquiry on emergency remote teaching in higher education. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(4), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1936547

Setyawan, F., & Istiandaru, A. (2019). Implementasi Self Regulated Flipped Classroom pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 3(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v3i1.699

Setyawan, F., Prasetyo, P. W., & Nurnugroho, B. A. (2020). Developing complex analysis textbook to enhance students ’ critical thinking. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i1.8741

Setyawan, F., Sumargiyani, S., & Hamzah, R. (2017). Lesson Study: Gallery Walk to Support Students. Proceeding the First AD INTERCOMME, 213–219.

Son, A. L., Darhim, D., & Fatimah, S. (2020). Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability Based on Teaching Models Intervention and Cognitive Style. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.11.2.10744.209-222

Tabesh, Y. (2017). Computational Thinking: A 21st Century Skill. Olympiads in Informatics, 11, 65–70. https://doi.org/10.15388/ioi.2017.special.10

Widiyoko, S. E. P. (2012). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian (Delapan) (8th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Wing, J. M. (2011). Research Notebook: Computational Thinking-What and Why? The Link Magazine, 6, 20–23.

Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. SIGCSE’11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953297

Yanuarni, R., Yuanita, P., & Maimunah, M. (2021). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Problem Based Learning Terintegrasi Keterampilan Abad 21. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.24127/AJPM.V10I2.3331

Zapalska, A. M., Nowduri, S., Imbriale, P., & Wroblewski, B. (2018). A Framework for Critical Thinking Skills Development Across Business Curriculum Using the 21st Century Bloom’ s Taxonomy. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.2.2.002




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4308

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.