THE EFFECT OF HYBRID LEARNING AND ENJOYMENT LEARNING IN INCREASING ADVANCED MATHEMATICAL THINKING

Ayu Aristika(1*), Darhim Darhim(2), Dadang Juandi(3), Kusnandi Kusnandi(4),

(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(4) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Abstract

AMT ability is one of the skills that is a priority to be developed in learning mathematics in universities. This research aims to test the effect of hybrid learning and enjoyment learning in improving Advance Mathematical Thinking of prospective teacher students moderated by learning style. This research is a quantitative research that aims to examine the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. The sample in this study is conducted by purposive sampling based on certain criteria. The research data is obtained by distributing questionnaires to the mathematics education program student at University X in Bandung City. The data collected is analyzed by path analysis assisted by Smart PLS application. Smart PLS analysis in this study is carried out in 2 stages which are the analysis of the outer model and the inner model. Analysis of the inner model is aimed at (1) testing the validity and reliability of the instrument and (2) performing the r-square test to determine the percentage of influence. The test results show that learning enjoyment and hybrid learning have a significant positive effect on advanced mathematics learning. The learning styles in this study have not been able to moderate the relationship between hybrid learning and enjoy learning on Advance Mathematical Thinking. Hybrid learning can be used as an alternative or learning solution in improving advanced mathematical learning.

Keywords: hybrid learning, Advance Mathematical Thinking, enjoyment learning, prospective teacher students, learning style

 

Abstrak

Kemampuan AMT merupakan salah satu kemampuan matematis yang menjadi prioritas untuk dikembangkan dalam pembelajaran matematika di perguruan tinggi. Penelitian Ini Bertujuan Untuk Menguji Pengaruh Hybrid Learning dan Enjoyment Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Berpikir Advance Mathematical Thinking of Prospective Teacher Students dimoderasi Gaya Belajar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif yang bertjuan untuk menguji pengaruh variabel independen terhadap variabel dependen. Sample dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan purposive sampling dengan berdasarkan beberapa kriteria tertentu. Data penelitian diperoleh dengan menyebar quesioner pada mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan Matematika di Universitas X di Kota Bandung. Data yang terkumpul dianalisa dengan analisis path berbantuan aplikasi Smart PLS. Analisis smart PLS pada penelitian ini dilakukan dengan 2 tahapan yaitu analisa outer model dan inner model. Analisa inner model untuk 1) menguji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen serta 2) melakukan uji r square untuk mengetahui presentase pengaruh. Hasil pengujian hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa enjoyment learning dan Hybrid learning berpengaruh secara positif signifikan terhadap Advance mathematic learning. Adapun, gaya belajar dalam penelitianini belum mampu memoderasi hubungan hybrid learning dan enjoyment learning terhadap Advance Mathematic Thinking. Hybrid learning dapat dapat dijadikan alternatif atau solusi pembelajaran dalam meningkatkan Advance Mathematic Learning.

Kata kunci: pembelajaran hibrid, Advance Mathematical Thinking, kenikmatan belajar, mahasiswa calon guru, gaya belajar


Keywords


hybrid learning, advanced mathematical thinking, enjoyment learning, prospective teacher students, learning style

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adnan, & Bahri, A. (2018). Beyond effective teaching: Enhancing Students’ Metacognitive Skill through Guided Inquiry. In IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 954.

Aguirre, J. M., Turner, E. E., Bartell, T. G., Kalinec-Craig, C., Foote, M. Q., Roth McDuffie, A., & Drake, C. (2013). Making Connections in Practice: How Prospective Elementary Teachers Connect to Children’s Mathematical Thinking and Community Funds of Knowledge in Mathematics Instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112466900

Barenfanger, O. (2005). Learning Management : A New Approach to Structuring Hybrid Learning Arrangements. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching.

Bertens, K. (1975). Sejarah Filsafat Yunani.

Bochenski, J. (1963). Philosophy An Introduction.

Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(5), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4

Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2013). Online learning in higher education: randomized trial compares hybrid learning to traditional course. Education Next, 13(2), 58–65.

Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., & Pickard, P. (2003). Using Blended Learning to Improve Student Success Rates in Learning to Program. Journal of Educational Media. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165032000153160

Brousseau, G., & Warfield, V. (2020). Didactic situations in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 206–213.

Brousseau, Guy, & Warfield, V. (2020). Didactic Situations in Mathematics Education. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_47

Buali, H. W., Balaha, H. M., Muhaidab, S. N. A. (2013). Assessment of learning style in a sample of saudi medical students. Journal of Acta Inform Medical, 21(2), 83–88.

Caillot, M. (2007). The building of a new academic field: The case of French didactiques. European Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.125

Chafiq, N., & Talbi, M. (2017). Tutoring Functions in a Blended Learning System: Case of Specialized French Teaching. In IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (Vol. 8, Issue 2).

Chen, W., Niu, Z., Zhao, X., & Li, Y. (2014). A hybrid recommendation algorithm adapted in e-learning environments. World Wide Web, 17(2), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-012-0187-z

Chen, Y. S., & Cheng, C. H. (2013). Assessing mathematics learning achievement using hybrid rough set classifiers and multiple regression analysis. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 13(2), 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.10.013

Chirino-Barceló, V., & Molina, A. (2011). Critical Factors in Defining the Mobile Learning Model: An Innovative Process for Hybrid Learning at the Tecnologico de Monterrey, a Mexican University. Handbook of Research on Mobility and Computing, 1, 774–792. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-042-6

Cremers, P. H. M., Wals, A. E. J., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2016). Design principles for hybrid learning configurations at the interface between school and workplace. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9209-6

Cribbs, J., & Linder, S. M. (2013). Teacher Practices and Hybrid Space in a Fifth-Grade Mathematics Classroom. Mathematics Educator, 55–81.

De Poter, B., & Hernacki, M. (1999). Quantum learning. Kaifa.

Deely, J. (1994). The Grand Vision on JSTOR. 371–400.

Dowling, C., Godfrey, J. M., & Gyles, N. (2003). Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students’ learning outcomes? Accounting Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928032000154512

Dreyfus, T. (2002). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In Advanced mathematical thinking. In Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Springer, 25–41.

Dubinsky, E. (2002). Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematical Thinking. In Advanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 95–126). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_7

Fernández, C., Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2012). Learning to notice students’ mathematical thinking through on-line discussions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0425-y

Ferrari, P. . (2003). Abstraction in mathematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

Gadanidis, G., & Geiger, V. (2010). A social perspective on technology-enhanced mathematical learning: From collaboration to performance. In ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education (Vol. 42, Issue 1, pp. 91–104). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0213-5

Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with Technology, 8(6).

Gecer, A., & Dag, F. (2012). A Blended Learning Experience, Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2012. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 438–442.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete IBM SPSS. In Semarang, Universitas Diponegoro.

Grgurovic, M. (2011). Blended Learning in an ESL Class: A Case Study on JSTOR. Calico Journal, 29(1).

Halmos, P. R. (1980). The Heart of Mathematics. The American Mathematical Monthly, 87(7), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1980.11995081

Harahap, F., Nasution, N. E. A., & Manurung, B. (2019). The Effect of Blended Learning on Student’s Learning Achievement and Science Process Skills in Plant Tissue Culture Course, International Journal of Instruction, 2019-Jan. International Journal of Instruction, 12, 521–538.

Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2013). Advanced mathematical-thinking at any age: Its nature and its development. In Advanced Mathematical Thinking: A Special Issue of Mathematical Thinking and Learning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315045955

Hartanto, F. M. (2018). Paradigma Baru Manajemen Indonesia: Menciptakan Nilai dengan Bertumpu Pada Kebijakan dan Potensi Insani. Mizan Pustaka.

Hendrayati, H., & Pamungkas, B. (2013). Implementation of Hybrid Learning Model Learning Process Statistics II Course In Management Prodi. J. Penelit. Educators, 13(2).

Herdian. (2010). Pengaruh Metode Discovery terhadap Kemampuam Analogi dan Generalisasi Matematis Siswa SMP. Tesis UPI Bandung.

Herlina, E., & Batusangkar, S. (2015). Advanced Mathematical Thinking and the Way to Enhance It. ERIC: Journal of Education and Practice, 6(5), 79–88.

Howard, J. P., & Beyers, J. F. (Eds.). (2020). Teaching and Learning Mathematics Online. CRC Press.

Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2019). Educational technology: a primer for the 21st century. Springer.

Hudiono, B. (2005). Peran pembelajaran diskursus multi representasi terhadap pengembangan kemampuan matematik dan daya representasi pada siswa SLTP. Disertasi UPI Bandung.

Hudson, B., & Johannes Kansanen, P. (1999). Didaktik/Fachdidaktik as the Science(-s) of the Teaching Profession? Didactics-Learning and Teaching View project Group Work with Multimedia in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom View project. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2646.4726

Husamah, H. (2015). Blended Project Based Learning: Metacognitive Awareness of Biology Education New Students - UMM Institutional Repository. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 9(4), 274–281.

Hutajulu, M., & Minarti, E. D. (2017). Meningkatkan kemampuan advanced mathematical thinking dan habits of mind mahasiswa melalui pendekatan keterampilan metakognitif. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika (JES-MAT), 3(2), 177–194.

Hwang, I. (2018). Militarising national security through criminalisation of conscientious objectors to conscription in South Korea. Critical Studies on Security. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2018.1424986

I Made Arnawa, -. (2006). MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMBUKTIAN MAHASISWA DALAM ALJABAR ABSTRACK MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN BERDASARKAN TEORI APOS.

Isnarto, W., Suryadi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2014). Students’ proof ability: Exploratory studies of abstract algebra course. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(6), 215–228.

Jamison, A., Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2014). Hybrid Learning: An integrative approach to engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20041

Johnson, A., & Miller, J. (2010). Comparison of student’s learning style in STEM discipline. Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering Research Conference.

Kansanen, P. (2014). Teaching as a master’s level profession in Finland: Theoretical reflections and practical solutions. In Workplace Learning in Teacher Education: International Practice and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7826-9_16

Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., & Yusof, Y. M. (2010). Obstacles in the learning of two-variable functions through mathematical thinking approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.024

Kiviniemi, M. T. (2014). Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-47

Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2011). E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Computers and Education, 56(3), 885–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.001

Klimova, B. F., & Kacetl, J. (2015). Hybrid Learning and its Current Role in the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 477–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.830

Krishnan, S. (2018). Students’ perceptions of learning mode in mathematics. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 32–41.

Kusnandi. (2008). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Dan Menyusun Bukti Mahasiswa Melalui Strategi Abduktif-Deduktif. International Scientific Journal of Social Science and Humaniora, 2(2).

Laboy-Rush, D. (2011). Integrated STEM Education through Project-Based Learning. Learning.Com.

Miyakawa, T., & Winsløw, C. (2009). Didactical designs for students’ proportional reasoning: An “open approach” lesson and a “fundamental situation.” Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9188-y

Nardi, E. (2017). From advanced mathematical thinking to university mathematics education: A story of emancipation and enrichment. In CERME 10.

Nasution. (2004). Didaktik Asas-Asas Mengajar. Bumi Aksara.

Olive, J., Makar, K., Hoyos, V., Kor, L. K., Kosheleva, O., & STRäSSER, R. (2009). Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies. In Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain. Springer, Boston, MA.

Osorio Gómez, L. A., & Duart, J. M. (2012). A hybrid approach to university subject learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01175.x

Piaget, J. (2013). The moral judgment of the child. In The Moral Judgment of the Child. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009681

Powell, A., Beth Rabbitt, iNACOL, & Learning Accelerator Kathryn Kennedy, T. (2014). iNACOL Blended Learning Teacher Competency Framework. In International Association for K-12 Online Learning. International Association for K-12 Online Learning. 1934 Old Gallows Road Suite 350, Vienna, VA 22182. Tel: 888-956-2265; Tel: 703-752-6216; Fax: 703-752-6201; e-mail: info@inacol.org; Web site: http://www.inacol.org.

Prashign, B. (2007). The power of learning styles: Memicu anak melejitkan prestasi dengan mengenali gaya belajarnya. Kaifa.

Pratiwi, D. (2014). Gaya belajar dominan pada siswa berprestasi dalam kegiatan siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar di SD Negeri 2 Gombong tahun ajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal FKIP, 7(3), 1–20.

Ramakrisnan, P., Yahya, Y. B., Hasrol, M. N. H., & Aziz, A. A. (2012). Blended Learning: A Suitable Framework For E-Learning In Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.356

Rasmussen, K., & Isoda, M. (2019). The intangible task–a revelatory case of teaching mathematical thinking in Japanese elementary schools. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1555714

Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2015). Digital equity and intercultural education. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9419-z

Rezat, S. (2006). The structures of German mathematics textbooks. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652785

Risnanjaya. (2013). Pengaruh Penerapan Blended Learning Berbasis Website terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Berpikir Logis Matematis Siswa SMA. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Ruthven, K. (2012). The didactical tetrahedron as a heuristic for analysing the incorporation of digital technologies into classroom practice in support of investigative approaches to teaching mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0376-8

Samparadja, H., Suryadi, D., & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2014). he influence of inductive-deductive approach based on modified definition in algebra structure learning toward student’s proving ability viewed based on college entrance track. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(7), 239–248.

Santrock. (2012). Life Span Development (Novitha (Ed.)). Erlangga.

Soemarmo, U. (2014). Advanced Mathematical Thinking and Habits of Mind.

Suda, K. J., Sterling, J. M., Guirguis, A. B., & Mathur, S. K. (2014). Student perception and academic performance after implementation of a blended learning approach to a drug information and literature evaluation course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6(3), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2014.02.017

Sugihartono. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. UNY Press.

Sujanem, R., Poedjiastuti, S., & Jatmiko, B. (2018). The Effectiveness of problem-based hybrid learning model in physics teaching to enhance critical thinking of the students of SMAN. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1040(1), 12040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1040/1/012040

Supriatna, T. (2011). PENGEMBANGAN DISAIN DIDAKTIS BAHAN AJAR PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS LUAS DAERAH SEGITIGA PADA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Suryadi, A. (2007). Pemanfaatan ICT dalam Pembelajaran . Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh, 8(2), 83–98.

Suryana, D. (2016). Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini: Stimulasi & Aspek Perkembangan Anak. Prenada Media.

Susilawati, W. (2014). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Insan Mandiri.

Tall, D. (2002). The Psychology of Advanced Mathematical Thinking. In Advanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 3–21). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_1

Tall, D. (2014). Advanced Mathematical Thinking & The Computer. In Advanced Mathematical Thinking & The Computer (Issue january 1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_2

Thorne, K. (2003). Blended Learning: How to Intergrate Online Learning and Traditional Learning. In Kogan Page.

Tsai, A. (2011). A hybrid e-learning model incorporating some of the principal learning theories. Social Behavior and Personality. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.2.145

Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x

Uno, H. H. B. (2010). Model pembelajaran: menciptakan proses belajar mengajar yang kreatif dan efektif. In Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Van Velzen, J. H. (n.d.). Eleventh-Grade High School Students’ Accounts of Mathematical Metacognitive Knowledge: Explicitness and Systematicity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9689-3

Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.11.001

Watson, A. (2001). Instances of mathematical thinking among low attaining students in an ordinary secondary classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00088-3

Winslow, C. (2004). Semiotics as an analytic tool for the didactics of mathematics. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education.

Yazici, H. J. (2005). A study of collaborative learning style and team learning performance. Education+ Training.

Yoon, C., Thomas, M. O. J., & Dreyfus, T. (2011). Gestures and insight in advanced mathematical thinking. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 891–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.608861




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.4064

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.