PROFIL BERPIKIR KRITIS MAHASISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT DAN LEARNING STYLE
(1) 
(2) Universitas Flores
(3) Universitas Flores
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Each individual can think critically in solving problems according to the differences in their adversity quotient and learning style. This study aims to describe the critical thinking profile of mathematics students who have visual, auditory, kinesthetic learning styles and adversity quotient climbers in solving geometry problems. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. The research subjects were students of mathematics education at the University of Flores. The instruments in this study were the researchers themselves, adversity quotient questionnaires, learning style questionnaires, and Problem Solving Tests. The results obtained are that 1) Subjects with visual learning style and adversity quotient climbers in solving problems can understand the problems at hand, can plan and can carry out the completion process well, and re-examine the work. 2) Subjects with auditory learning style and adversity quotient climbers can understand the problem given, do not plan so that the implementation is not detailed, re-examine the work. 3) Subjects with kinesthetic learning style and adversity quotient climbers can understand the problem, plan but the subject solves it directly, does not re-examine what has been done. It was concluded that each individual has a different way of understanding and solving problems.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Afri, L. D. (2018). HUbungan Adversity Quotient dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Axiom, VII(2), 47–53.
Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ennis, R. H., & Weir, E. (1985). The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test.
Imamuddin, M., Rusdi, Isnaniah, & Audina, M. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar. AL Khawarizmi, 3(1), 11–20.
Kusmanto, H. (2014). Pengaruh Berpikir Kristis Terhadap Kemampuan Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika (Studi Kasus di Kelas VII SMP Wahid Hasyim Moga). EduMA, 3(1), 92–106.
Lai, E. (2011). Critical Thinking, A Literature Review. Research Report:1-49.
Masfingatin, T. (2013). PROSES BERPIKIR SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT ( Penelitian dilakukan di MTs Negeri Dolopo Tahun Ajaran 2011 / 2012 ). JIPM: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1–8.
Molleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Edisi Revisi.
Mulyati, T. (2016). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 3(2), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v3i2.2807
Nurhayati, N., & Fajrianti, N. (2015). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient (AQ) dan Motivasi Berprestasi terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i1.110
Parameswari, P., & Kurniyati, T. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. JPM Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 89–97.
Polya, G. (1978). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method second edition. The Mathematical Gazette, Vol. 30, p. 181.
Rahimah, N. (2019). Profil Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika. LENTERA Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 14(1), 59–68.
Ramalisa, Y. (2013). Proses BErpikir Kritis SIswa SMA Tipe Kepribadian Thinking dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Edumatica, 03(01), 42–47.
Shodiqin, A., & Utomo, P. W. (2020). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Menurut Krulik Dan Rudnick Ditinjau Dari Kemampuanan Wolfram Mathematica. (201920).
Sugiono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Sugiyono. Mode Penelitian Kualitatif, 5(January), 1–5.
Sumartini, T. S. (2018). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v5i2.270
Sumaryanta. (2018). PENILAIAN HOTs DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics and Education, 8(8), 500–509.
Susandi, A. D. (2019). Identifikasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. SIGMA, 6(1), 26–41.
Umrana, Cahyono, E., & Sudia, M. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika, 4(1), 67–76.
Waskitoningtyas, R. S. (2017). PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITIES ARE REVIEWED IN THE LEARNING STYLE OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS AT BALIKPAPAN UNIVERSITY. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 432–440.
Willia, A., Annurwanda, P., & Friantini, R. N. (2020). Proses Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. AlphaMath Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 116–128.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3882
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.