DESCRIPTION OF THE DIFFICULTY OF STUDENTS' MATHEMATICS PROBLEM SOLVING ASSESSED FROM ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ)

Amiratih Siti Aisyah(1*), Riyadi Riyadi(2), Sri Subanti(3),

(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(3) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


This study aims to determine the difficulty of solving mathematic problems among students AQ climbers, AQ campers, and AQ quitters. This type of research was qualitative research with a descriptive approach. The subject of this study is the 3rd grade of  XI MIPA Batik High School 2 Surakarta in the academic year 2020/2021 which constitutes 6 students. The subject taking was done by giving an adversity quotient questionnaire. From the results of filling out the questionnaire, the subjects were categorized based on their AQ. Furthermore, given a mathematic problem-solving test. After seeing the test results, three subjects representing AQ climbers, AQ campers, and AQ quitters were selected purposively for further interviews. The results showed: 1) The climbers subject experienced two difficulties in solving mathematic problems, namely difficulties in understanding problems and difficulties in implementing plans. 2) The subject of the campers has three difficulties in solving mathematic problems, namely difficulties in understanding problems, difficulties in implementing plans, and difficulties in reviewing. 3) The quitters subject experiences four difficulties in solving mathematic problems, namely difficulties in understanding problems, difficulties in planning, difficulties in implementing plans and difficulties in reviewing, and difficulties in revisiting.


Keywords


Adversity Quotient, Description, Difficulty, Problem Solving

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdiyani, S. S., Khabibah, S., & Rahmawati, N. D. (2019). Profile of Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of Students of SMP Negeri 1 Jogoroto Based on Polya's Steps in terms of Adversity Quotient. Al-Khwarizmi: Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Education, 7(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v7i2.774

Afri, L. D. (2018). The Relationship Between Adversity Quotient and The Problem Solving Ability of Junior High School Students in Learning Mathematics. AXIOM: Journal of Education and Mathematics, 7(2), 47–53.

Akbar, P., Hamid, A., Bernard, M., & Sugandi, A. I. (2017). Analysis of Problem Solving Ability and Mathematical Disposition of Class XI SMA Putra Juang Students in Opportunity Material. Journal Cendekia : Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v2i1.62

Amelia, W. (2016). Characteristics and Types of Learning Difficulties in Slow Learner Children. Aisyah's Journal : Journal of Health Sciences, 1(2), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.30604/jika.v1i2.21

Amirullah, Mulbar, U., & Djam’an, N. (2019). Description of Students' Mathematics Problem Solving Difficulties in terms of Adversity Quotient. Issues in Mathematics Education, 3(1), 22–29. http://www.ojs.unm.ac.id/imed

Anisah, & Sri Lastuti. (2019). Identification of Mathematical Problem Solving Abilities for Prospective Elementary School Teachers at STKIP Taman Siswa Bima and How to Develop them. MIPA EDUCATION JOURNAL, 9(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v9i2.217

Apriliani, U., Wasidi, W., & Sholihah, A. (2018). The Relationship Between Adversity Quotient (AQ) and Academic Procrastination of Class X Students of SMA Negeri 5 Bengkulu City. Consilia : Scientific Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 1(3), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.33369/consilia.1.3.12-23

Aryono, S. Y., Machmuroch, & Karyanta, N. A. (2017). Relationship between Adversity Quotient and Emotional Maturity with Tolerance to Stress in Nature Lovers of Sebelas Maret University. Discourse Journal, 9(18), 12–27. http://jurnalwacana.psikologi.fk.uns.ac.id/index.php/wacana/article/view/108

Christidamayani, A. P., & Kristanto, Y.D. (2020). The Effects of Problem Posing Learning Model on Students' Learning Achievement and Motivation. ArXiv, 2008, 100–108.

Dewi, E. Y. S. S., Mayangsari, M. D., & Fauzia, R. (2017). Relationship between Adversity Quotient and Resilience in Advanced-Stage Cancer Patients. Ecopsy Journal, 3(3), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.20527/ecopsy.v3i3.2664

Dewi, S. I. K. and K. (2014). Analysis of the Errors of Class VIII Students in Solving Problems on the Matter of Factorization of Algebraic Forms of State Junior High School 1 Kamal Odd Semester Academic Year 2013/2014. MATHEdunesa Scientific Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 195–202.

Ellasari, M. & Wibowo, T. (2019). Climbers Students' Mathematical Reasoning Level in Solving Pisa Problems. PROCEEDINGS

Fitri Alyani, R. Z. (2020). Application of The Rasch Model: Analysis of the Adversity Quotient of Students in Mathematics. Math Didactic: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 226–234.

Hanum, L. (2018). Differences in Student Adversity Intelligence by Gender. HONAI: International Journal for Educational, Social, Political & Cultural Studies 1(2), 115–128.

Hardianto, Y., & Sucihayati, R. B. (2019). The Relationship between Adversity Quotient and Career Adaptability in the 2015 KOAS FKG X at RSGM. Psibernetika. https://doi.org/10.30813/psibernetika.v11i2.1433

Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, Prabawanto, S. (2018). The Mathematical Argumentation Ability and Adversity Quotient (AQ) of Pre-Service Mathematics Teacher. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 239–248.

Ifanali. (2014). Application of Polya's Steps to Improve Problem Solving Ability of Story Solving Questions in Grade VII Students of SMP Negeri 13 Palu. Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako, 1(3), 147–158. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/JEPMT/article/view/3217

Jana, P. (2018). Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Mathematical Problems on Vector Subjects. Mercumatika Journal : Mathematics Research Journal and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.26486/jm.v2i2.398

Kartikaningtyas, V., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Riyadi, R. (2018). The Effect of Brain-Based Learning with Contextual Approach Viewed from Adversity Quotient. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012014

Khasanah, U., & Sutama. (2015). Difficulty Completing Mathematics Story Questions in Junior High School Students. Proceeding of the 2015 UMS National Mathematics Education Seminar.

Khumairoh, B., Amin, S. M., & Wijayanti, P. (2020). Middle-Grade Student Proportional Reasoning in Solving Mathematical Problems in terms of Adversity Quotient. Pedagogia : Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v9i1.259

Mafulah, J., & Amin, S. M. (2020). Students' Mathematical Connection Ability in Solving Mathematical Problems in terms of Adversity Quotient. MATHEdunesa, 9(1), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v9n2.p241-250

Maini, N., & Izzati, N. (2019). Analysis of Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Based on Bransford & Stein's Steps in terms of Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Kiprah, 7(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v7i1.1175

Mawaddah, S., & Anisah, H. (2015). Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Mathematics Learning by Using in SMPN Generative Learning Model in Junior High School. EDU-MAT: Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v3i2.644

Merianah, M. (2019). The Influence of Emotional Intelligence and Adversity Quotient on The Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of SDIT IQRA’1 Students in Bengkulu City. Raflesia Mathematics Education Journal, 4(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.33449/jpmr.v4i1.7526

Nur, A. S. & Palobo, M. (2018). Profile of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability Study in Terms of Difficult in Cognitive Style and Gender. Creative–Innovative Mathematics Journal, 9(2), 139–148.

Purwaningsih, D & Ardani, A. (2020). Mathematic Problem Solving Ability Material Exponent and Logaritma Viewed from Learning Styles and Gender Difference. AKSIOMA: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Program, 9(1), 118–125.

Purwanti, P. (2019). Analysis of the Level of Adversity Quotient (AQ) of High School Students in Mathematics Learning through Problem Based Learning ( PBL ). Proceedings of the 2019 National Seminar on Mathematics and Mathematics Education for Sesiomadika.

Putra, M. R. G., Hidayati, N. O., & Nurhidayah, I. (2016). The Relationship between Achievement Motivation and Adversity Quotient for Youth Assisted Citizens in LPKA Class II Sukamiskin Bandung. Indonesian Journal of Nursing Education, 2(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpki.v2i1.2853

Rany, W. (2015). Thinking Process of Students in Solving Mathematical Problems based on the Theory of Polya in terms of the Climbers Type Adversity Quotient. Al-Jabar: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 183–193.

Saidah, S., & Lailatuzzahro, Al-Akhda, A. (2014). The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Adversity Quotient (AQ). Journal of Psychology, 2(2), 54–61.

Septianingtyas, N., & Jusra, H. (2020). Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Based on Adversity Quotient. Journal Cendekia : Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.263

Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity Quotient: Turn Obstacles into Opportunities. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Sunandi, & Supratman. (2019).Students' Creative Thinking Process in Mathematical Problem Solving in terms of Adversity Quotient Based on Wallas' Model. National Seminar Proceeding & Call For Papers, 552–561.

Suryaningrum, C. W., Purwanto, Subanji. (2020). Semiotic Reasoning Emerges in Constructing Properties of a Rectangle A Study of Adversity Quotient. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 95–110.

Yanti, A. P., & Syazali, M. (2016). Analysis of Students' Thinking Process in Solving Mathematical Problems based on Bransford and Stein's Steps in terms of Adversity Quotient. Al-Jabar : Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v7i1.132

Yarmayani, A. (2016). Analysis of The Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of Students of Class XI MIPA Senior High School 1 Jambi City. Dikdaya Scientific Journal, 12–19.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3663

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.